Women as motivators in the use of safety belts.

Health values Pub Date : 1990-11-01
G L Martin, I M Newman
{"title":"Women as motivators in the use of safety belts.","authors":"G L Martin,&nbsp;I M Newman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A sample of rural and urban women was interviewed using a questionnaire based on Fishbein's and Ajzen's Theory of Reasoned Action. Two hundred women were asked about their intentions to use safety-belts and to encourage others to use safety-belts. Both intent and nonintent women highly valued saving lives, feeling safer, and reducing the likelihood of injuries, but they differed markedly in their beliefs that using safety-belts would necessarily save life, enhance their feeling of safety, and reduce the likelihood of injuries. Intent and nonintent users differed least in their beliefs that safety-belts would reduce injuries. Women who intended to use their safety-belts felt their action would encourage others to use belts and believed that they should encourage others to use their safety-belts. These intent safety-belt users did not see a strong social support for encouraging others to use safety belts and therefore were unlikely to do so. Programs to promote safety-belt use would capture the generally supportive attitudes of women if they could assist women to develop skills and confidence to express effectively their existing predisposition for safety-belt use.</p>","PeriodicalId":79617,"journal":{"name":"Health values","volume":"14 6","pages":"37-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A sample of rural and urban women was interviewed using a questionnaire based on Fishbein's and Ajzen's Theory of Reasoned Action. Two hundred women were asked about their intentions to use safety-belts and to encourage others to use safety-belts. Both intent and nonintent women highly valued saving lives, feeling safer, and reducing the likelihood of injuries, but they differed markedly in their beliefs that using safety-belts would necessarily save life, enhance their feeling of safety, and reduce the likelihood of injuries. Intent and nonintent users differed least in their beliefs that safety-belts would reduce injuries. Women who intended to use their safety-belts felt their action would encourage others to use belts and believed that they should encourage others to use their safety-belts. These intent safety-belt users did not see a strong social support for encouraging others to use safety belts and therefore were unlikely to do so. Programs to promote safety-belt use would capture the generally supportive attitudes of women if they could assist women to develop skills and confidence to express effectively their existing predisposition for safety-belt use.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女在使用安全带方面发挥激励作用。
使用基于Fishbein和Ajzen的理性行为理论的问卷调查对农村和城市妇女进行了采访。200名女性被问及她们使用安全带的意图,以及鼓励其他人使用安全带的意图。有意和无意的女性都高度重视挽救生命,感觉更安全,减少受伤的可能性,但她们在使用安全带一定会挽救生命,增强安全感,减少受伤的可能性方面的信念明显不同。有意使用者和非有意使用者对安全带能减少伤害的看法差异最小。打算使用安全带的女性认为她们的行为会鼓励其他人使用安全带,并认为她们应该鼓励其他人使用安全带。这些有意使用安全带的人没有看到鼓励他人使用安全带的强大社会支持,因此不太可能这样做。如果促进安全带使用的项目能够帮助妇女发展技能和信心,从而有效地表达她们现有的使用安全带的倾向,那么这些项目就会获得妇女的普遍支持态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of a physical fitness program in a blue-collar workforce. Women as motivators in the use of safety belts. Establishing drug use questionnaire concurrent validity: methodological considerations. An assessment of dental care for the underserved. Multi-attribute analysis of benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1