The double-edged sword of social service contracting: public accountability versus nonprofit autonomy.

IF 3.2 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Nonprofit Management & Leadership Pub Date : 1993-01-01 DOI:10.1002/nml.4130030404
J M Ferris
{"title":"The double-edged sword of social service contracting: public accountability versus nonprofit autonomy.","authors":"J M Ferris","doi":"10.1002/nml.4130030404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increased role of government contracts in the funding of nonprofits has heightened tensions as governments seek accountability and nonprofits seek to preserve autonomy. Considering both sides of the contract market this article suggests that the threat of government funding is exaggerated. Nonprofits are attractive contractor options because of their experience and trustworthiness. Governments should recognize that excessive intrusions limit the advantages of the nonprofit sector. At the same time, nonprofits should be conscious of the implications of public funding, just as they must be of other sources of funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47683,"journal":{"name":"Nonprofit Management & Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/nml.4130030404","citationCount":"65","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonprofit Management & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130030404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

Abstract

The increased role of government contracts in the funding of nonprofits has heightened tensions as governments seek accountability and nonprofits seek to preserve autonomy. Considering both sides of the contract market this article suggests that the threat of government funding is exaggerated. Nonprofits are attractive contractor options because of their experience and trustworthiness. Governments should recognize that excessive intrusions limit the advantages of the nonprofit sector. At the same time, nonprofits should be conscious of the implications of public funding, just as they must be of other sources of funding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会服务合同的双刃剑:公共责任与非营利组织的自主权。
政府合同在资助非营利组织方面的作用越来越大,这加剧了政府寻求问责制和非营利组织寻求保持自主权的紧张关系。考虑到合同市场的双方,本文认为政府资助的威胁被夸大了。非营利组织是有吸引力的承包商选择,因为它们经验丰富,值得信赖。政府应该认识到,过度的干预限制了非营利部门的优势。与此同时,非营利组织应该意识到公共资金的影响,就像他们必须意识到其他资金来源一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Nonprofit Management and Leadership (NML) publishes the field''s best conceptual advances in understanding management, leadership, or governance of private nonprofit organizations. Each issue of NML offers readers the authoritative insights of top scholars on the common concerns of nonprofit managers, leaders, and boards in all private nonprofit settings, including social services, the arts, education, foundations, community development, religion, and member associations. The journal publishes full research monographs up to 10,000 words, and research notes up to 5,500 words. All research methods and approaches are welcome, so long as authors can articulate substantial advances in knowledge relevant to the field and implications for practice.
期刊最新文献
Opportunities for organizational learning and innovation: A nonprofit case study during COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Beyond survival mode: Organizational resilience capabilities in nonprofit arts and culture fundraising during the Covid-19 pandemic. Operational challenges in a US nonprofit network amid COVID-19: Lessons from a food network in Virginia. Community foundations provide collaborative responses and local leadership in midst of COVID-19. Racialized minorities, trust, and crisis: Muslim-American nonprofits, their leadership and government relations during COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1