Marketing ethics, functions, and content: a health education/marketing survey.

Health values Pub Date : 1985-11-01
P D Cooper, K K King
{"title":"Marketing ethics, functions, and content: a health education/marketing survey.","authors":"P D Cooper,&nbsp;K K King","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Survey data were used to evaluate the role of marketing in the nonprofit arena of health promotion. Questionnaires utilizing a Likert type scale were sent to 106 marketers and 247 health educators soliciting their opinions about health care marketing. Both groups agreed that marketing was appropriate for both profit and non-profit organizations, but were not in total agreement on specific aspects of the marketing process. Marketers were adamant that marketing is not confined to promotional, advertising and communication functions, while health educators were neutral. Marketers were strong in their disagreement that marketing is selling; health educators were still neutral but in slight disagreement. Marketers did not believe that marketing uses gimmickry heavily, while health educators agreed that it does use gimmickry. A significant finding from the survey is that the major ethical issue for health educators is their view that marketing manipulates society. Both community and school health educators agreed that using marketing techniques is a step forward manipulation of a society, while the group of marketers disagreed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79617,"journal":{"name":"Health values","volume":"9 6","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Survey data were used to evaluate the role of marketing in the nonprofit arena of health promotion. Questionnaires utilizing a Likert type scale were sent to 106 marketers and 247 health educators soliciting their opinions about health care marketing. Both groups agreed that marketing was appropriate for both profit and non-profit organizations, but were not in total agreement on specific aspects of the marketing process. Marketers were adamant that marketing is not confined to promotional, advertising and communication functions, while health educators were neutral. Marketers were strong in their disagreement that marketing is selling; health educators were still neutral but in slight disagreement. Marketers did not believe that marketing uses gimmickry heavily, while health educators agreed that it does use gimmickry. A significant finding from the survey is that the major ethical issue for health educators is their view that marketing manipulates society. Both community and school health educators agreed that using marketing techniques is a step forward manipulation of a society, while the group of marketers disagreed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营销伦理、功能和内容:一项健康教育/营销调查。
调查数据用于评估市场营销在非营利性健康促进领域的作用。采用李克特式问卷对106名营销人员和247名健康教育工作者进行问卷调查,了解他们对医疗保健营销的看法。两组人都认为市场营销对盈利组织和非营利组织都是合适的,但在市场营销过程的具体方面并没有完全一致。营销人员坚持认为,营销不局限于促销、广告和沟通功能,而健康教育者则持中立态度。营销人员强烈反对营销就是销售;健康教育工作者仍然保持中立,但略有分歧。营销人员不相信营销大量使用噱头,而健康教育者同意它确实使用了噱头。这项调查的一个重要发现是,健康教育者面临的主要伦理问题是他们认为市场营销操纵了社会。社区和学校的健康教育工作者都同意,使用营销技术是对社会的进一步操纵,而营销人员则不同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of a physical fitness program in a blue-collar workforce. Women as motivators in the use of safety belts. Establishing drug use questionnaire concurrent validity: methodological considerations. An assessment of dental care for the underserved. Multi-attribute analysis of benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1