Effects of eyelid scrubbing on the lid margin.

J V Greiner, C D Leahy, T Glonek, S L Hearn, D Auerbach, L Davies
{"title":"Effects of eyelid scrubbing on the lid margin.","authors":"J V Greiner,&nbsp;C D Leahy,&nbsp;T Glonek,&nbsp;S L Hearn,&nbsp;D Auerbach,&nbsp;L Davies","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of eyelid scrubbing with an eyelid cleansing solution (ECS) to eyelid scrubbing with ECS and the addition of antibacterial or anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals on the clinical appearance, microbial status, tissue histology, and the inflammatory cell profile of the normal eyelid margin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyelid scrubbing was performed twice daily using ECS; ECS with the antibacterial sulfacetamide (ECS+); and ECS with sulfacetamide and prednisolone acetate (ECS++) over a 21 day period on three groups of 16 rabbits with clinically normal eyelids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant hyperemia of the margin occurred in all three groups over the 3 week period; however, the degree of hyperemia was less with ECS+ (P<0.05) and ECS++ (P<0.05). Chemosis, tearing, mucus discharge, and the microbial status were not significantly different than controls. There were no marked histologic differences in the tissues, except for increased red blood cell packing in the small vessels near the lid margins in scrubbed eyelids, consistent with hyperemia. The inflammatory cell profile showed minimal changes that were not statistically significant in any of the three groups, except that >50% of mast cells showed evidence of degranulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of ECS with an antibiotic, or an antibiotic and steroid solution, resulted in less inflammation than scrubbing with ECS alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 2","pages":"109-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of eyelid scrubbing with an eyelid cleansing solution (ECS) to eyelid scrubbing with ECS and the addition of antibacterial or anti-inflammatory pharmaceuticals on the clinical appearance, microbial status, tissue histology, and the inflammatory cell profile of the normal eyelid margin.

Methods: Eyelid scrubbing was performed twice daily using ECS; ECS with the antibacterial sulfacetamide (ECS+); and ECS with sulfacetamide and prednisolone acetate (ECS++) over a 21 day period on three groups of 16 rabbits with clinically normal eyelids.

Results: Significant hyperemia of the margin occurred in all three groups over the 3 week period; however, the degree of hyperemia was less with ECS+ (P<0.05) and ECS++ (P<0.05). Chemosis, tearing, mucus discharge, and the microbial status were not significantly different than controls. There were no marked histologic differences in the tissues, except for increased red blood cell packing in the small vessels near the lid margins in scrubbed eyelids, consistent with hyperemia. The inflammatory cell profile showed minimal changes that were not statistically significant in any of the three groups, except that >50% of mast cells showed evidence of degranulation.

Conclusions: Use of ECS with an antibiotic, or an antibiotic and steroid solution, resulted in less inflammation than scrubbing with ECS alone.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刷眼睑对眼睑边缘的影响。
目的:比较用眼睑清洁液(ECS)擦洗眼睑与用ECS擦洗眼睑并添加抗菌或抗炎药物对正常眼睑缘的临床外观、微生物状态、组织组织学和炎症细胞谱的影响。方法:采用ECS刷眼睑,每日2次;ECS与抗菌磺胺(ECS+);三组16只眼睑临床正常的家兔,分别用磺胺和醋酸泼尼松龙(ecs++)进行ECS治疗,疗程21 d。结果:3周内三组均出现明显的切缘充血;然而,ECS+的充血程度较轻(P50%的肥大细胞显示脱颗粒的证据)。结论:与单独使用ECS擦洗相比,使用ECS联合抗生素或抗生素和类固醇溶液导致的炎症更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microbiologic evaluation of frequent-replacement soft contact lenses. Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo. Initial selection of soft contact lenses based on corneal characteristics. Retrospective safety study of the herrick lacrimal plug: a device used to occlude the lacrimal canaliculus. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1