[The biologically equivalent dose (BED): how solid is the calculation of this factor? A consideration of margins of error of biologically equivalent dose].

J M Jensen, J Zimmermann
{"title":"[The biologically equivalent dose (BED): how solid is the calculation of this factor? A consideration of margins of error of biologically equivalent dose].","authors":"J M Jensen,&nbsp;J Zimmermann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To predict the effect on tumours in radiotherapy, especially relating to irreversible effects, but also to realize the retrospective assessment the so called L-Q-model is relied on at present. Internal specific organ parameters, such as alpha, beta, gamma, Tp, Tk, and rho, as well as external parameters, so as D, d, n, V, and Vref, were used for determination of the biologically equivalent dose BED. While the external parameters are determinable with small deviations, the internal parameters depend on biological varieties and dispersions: in some cases the lowest value is assumed to be delta = +/- 25%. This margin of error goes on to the biologically equivalent dose by means of the principle of superposition of errors. In some selected cases (lung, kidney, skin, rectum) these margins of error were calculated exemplarily. The input errors especially of the internal parameters cause a mean error delta on the biologically equivalent dose and a dispersion of the single fraction dose d dependent on the organ taking into consideration, of approximately 8-30%. Hence it follows only a very critical and cautious application of those L-Q-algorithms in expert proceedings, and in radiotherapy more experienced based decisions are recommended, instead of acting only upon simple two-dimensional mechanistic ideas.</p>","PeriodicalId":76505,"journal":{"name":"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik","volume":"52 10-12","pages":"355-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To predict the effect on tumours in radiotherapy, especially relating to irreversible effects, but also to realize the retrospective assessment the so called L-Q-model is relied on at present. Internal specific organ parameters, such as alpha, beta, gamma, Tp, Tk, and rho, as well as external parameters, so as D, d, n, V, and Vref, were used for determination of the biologically equivalent dose BED. While the external parameters are determinable with small deviations, the internal parameters depend on biological varieties and dispersions: in some cases the lowest value is assumed to be delta = +/- 25%. This margin of error goes on to the biologically equivalent dose by means of the principle of superposition of errors. In some selected cases (lung, kidney, skin, rectum) these margins of error were calculated exemplarily. The input errors especially of the internal parameters cause a mean error delta on the biologically equivalent dose and a dispersion of the single fraction dose d dependent on the organ taking into consideration, of approximately 8-30%. Hence it follows only a very critical and cautious application of those L-Q-algorithms in expert proceedings, and in radiotherapy more experienced based decisions are recommended, instead of acting only upon simple two-dimensional mechanistic ideas.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物等效剂量(BED):这个因素的计算有多可靠?考虑生物等效剂量的误差范围[j]。
为了预测放疗对肿瘤的影响,特别是不可逆效应,以及实现回顾性评估,目前主要依赖于所谓的l - q模型。利用内部特定器官参数,如α、β、γ、Tp、Tk和rho,以及外部参数,如D、D、n、V和Vref来测定生物等效剂量BED。虽然外部参数可以以很小的偏差确定,但内部参数取决于生物品种和分散性:在某些情况下,假设最低值为δ = +/- 25%。根据误差叠加原理,这一误差范围延伸到生物等效剂量。在一些选定的病例(肺、肾、皮肤、直肠)中,这些误差范围是典型地计算出来的。输入误差,特别是内部参数的输入误差导致生物等效剂量的平均误差δ和单组分剂量d依赖于考虑到的器官的分散,约为8-30%。因此,在专家程序中,只有非常关键和谨慎地应用那些l - q算法,在放射治疗中,建议更有经验的决策,而不是仅仅根据简单的二维机械思想行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Primary sclerosing cholangitis]. [Pancreas divisum]. Kosmetische Ergebnisse nach brusterhaltender, radiologischer Mammakarzinomtherapie bei Patientinnen mit intramammären Seromen Arterielles popliteales Entrapment Syndrom (PAES) — ein Fallbericht zur Differentialdiagnose der Claudicatio intermittens Verfeinertes Staging von hilusnahen Bronchialkarzinomen durch EKG-gegatete Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT - Fallbeschreibung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1