Methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of contact lens care solutions and other compounds against Acanthamoeba: a review of the literature.

S L Buck, R A Rosenthal, B A Schlech
{"title":"Methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of contact lens care solutions and other compounds against Acanthamoeba: a review of the literature.","authors":"S L Buck,&nbsp;R A Rosenthal,&nbsp;B A Schlech","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to review the literature concerning the methods used to evaluate contact lens care solutions against Acanthamoeba. Acanthamoeba keratitis is a potential threat, with 85% of the cases being reported in contact lens wearers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Several studies from the published literature that evaluated contact lens disinfectants were reviewed. The variables included test organism, strain and morphology, growth conditions, inoculum preparation, inoculation method, test solutions and concentration, contact time, neutralization, recovery, quantitation method, and viability determination of survivors. The methods used to test Acanthamoeba against the disinfectants were compared and contrasted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a thorough review of methods used to test Acanthamoeba, it was found that there is great variability in the methods used to evaluate contact lens disinfectants. The majority of the studies used A.castellanii and A.polyphaga cysts grown axenically in PYG medium containing cations at about 30 degrees C and the inoculum contained about 1.0 x 10(5) cells/mL. Inactivation media or centrifugation of cells was used to neutralize test samples. Quantitation was performed in most studies and viability was checked in all studies. The disinfectants tested most often were PHMB, hydrogen peroxide, thimerosal, and chlorhexidine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After reviewing the studies presented here it can be concluded that an effective method for testing Acanthamoeba against contact lens disinfectants would include A.castellanii or A.polyphaga grown axenically in PYG containing cations and a concentration of organisms high enough to adequately measure kill, a neutralization step, recovery and quantitation of organisms followed by a viability check of survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"26 2","pages":"72-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review the literature concerning the methods used to evaluate contact lens care solutions against Acanthamoeba. Acanthamoeba keratitis is a potential threat, with 85% of the cases being reported in contact lens wearers.

Methods: Several studies from the published literature that evaluated contact lens disinfectants were reviewed. The variables included test organism, strain and morphology, growth conditions, inoculum preparation, inoculation method, test solutions and concentration, contact time, neutralization, recovery, quantitation method, and viability determination of survivors. The methods used to test Acanthamoeba against the disinfectants were compared and contrasted.

Results: After a thorough review of methods used to test Acanthamoeba, it was found that there is great variability in the methods used to evaluate contact lens disinfectants. The majority of the studies used A.castellanii and A.polyphaga cysts grown axenically in PYG medium containing cations at about 30 degrees C and the inoculum contained about 1.0 x 10(5) cells/mL. Inactivation media or centrifugation of cells was used to neutralize test samples. Quantitation was performed in most studies and viability was checked in all studies. The disinfectants tested most often were PHMB, hydrogen peroxide, thimerosal, and chlorhexidine.

Conclusions: After reviewing the studies presented here it can be concluded that an effective method for testing Acanthamoeba against contact lens disinfectants would include A.castellanii or A.polyphaga grown axenically in PYG containing cations and a concentration of organisms high enough to adequately measure kill, a neutralization step, recovery and quantitation of organisms followed by a viability check of survivors.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估隐形眼镜护理液和其他化合物对棘阿米巴的有效性的方法:文献综述。
目的:综述有关隐形眼镜护理液对棘阿米巴虫危害评价方法的文献。棘阿米巴角膜炎是一种潜在威胁,85%的病例报告发生在隐形眼镜佩戴者身上。方法:对已发表的评价隐形眼镜消毒剂的研究进行综述。变量包括受试菌、菌株和形态、生长条件、接种准备、接种方法、试验溶液和浓度、接触时间、中和、回收、定量方法和存活菌活力测定。对不同消毒剂对棘阿米巴的影响进行了比较。结果:经过对棘阿米巴测试方法的全面审查,发现用于评估隐形眼镜消毒剂的方法存在很大差异。大多数研究使用的是castellanii和a.p ayhaga包囊在30℃左右含阳离子的PYG培养基中异体生长,接种量约为1.0 × 10(5)个细胞/mL。使用失活培养基或细胞离心来中和测试样品。在大多数研究中进行了定量,并在所有研究中进行了活力检查。最常检测的消毒剂是PHMB、过氧化氢、硫柳汞和氯己定。结论:在回顾了本文提出的研究后,可以得出结论,一种有效的检测棘阿米巴对隐形眼镜消毒剂的影响的方法是:在含有阳离子的PYG中无性生长的A.castellanii或a.p ayhaga,其浓度足以充分测量杀死量,然后进行中和步骤,回收和定量生物体,然后对幸存者进行活力检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microbiologic evaluation of frequent-replacement soft contact lenses. Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo. Initial selection of soft contact lenses based on corneal characteristics. Retrospective safety study of the herrick lacrimal plug: a device used to occlude the lacrimal canaliculus. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1