Dosimetric analysis at ICRU reference points in HDR-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.

H T Eich, U Haverkamp, O Micke, F J Prott, R P Müller
{"title":"Dosimetric analysis at ICRU reference points in HDR-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.","authors":"H T Eich,&nbsp;U Haverkamp,&nbsp;O Micke,&nbsp;F J Prott,&nbsp;R P Müller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vivo dosimetry in bladder and rectum as well as determining doses on suggested reference points following the ICRU report 38 contribute to quality assurance in HDR-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma, especially to minimize side effects. In order to gain information regarding the radiation exposure at ICRU reference points in rectum, bladder, ureter and regional lymph nodes those were calculated (digitalisation) by means of orthogonal radiographs of 11 applications in patients with cervical carcinoma, who received primary radiotherapy. In addition, the doses at the ICRU rectum reference point was compared to the results of in vivo measurements in the rectum. The in vivo measurements were by factor 1.5 below the doses determined for the ICRU rectum reference point (4.05 +/- 0.68 Gy versus 6.11 +/- 1.63 Gy). Reasons for this were: calibration errors, non-orthogonal radiographs, movement of applicator and probe in the time span between X-ray and application, missing connection of probe and anterior rectal wall. The standard deviation of calculations at ICRU reference points was on average +/- 30%. Possible reasons for the relatively large standard deviation were difficulties in defining the points, identifying them on radiographs and the different locations of the applicators. Although 3 D CT, US or MR based treatment planning using dose volume histogram analysis is more and more established, this simple procedure of marking and digitising the ICRU reference points lengthened treatment planning only by 5 to 10 minutes. The advantages of in vivo dosimetry are easy practicability and the possibility to determine rectum doses during radiation. The advantages of computer-aided planning at ICRU reference points are that calculations are available before radiation and that they can still be taken into account for treatment planning. Both methods should be applied in HDR-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":76505,"journal":{"name":"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik","volume":"53 2","pages":"62-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vivo dosimetry in bladder and rectum as well as determining doses on suggested reference points following the ICRU report 38 contribute to quality assurance in HDR-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma, especially to minimize side effects. In order to gain information regarding the radiation exposure at ICRU reference points in rectum, bladder, ureter and regional lymph nodes those were calculated (digitalisation) by means of orthogonal radiographs of 11 applications in patients with cervical carcinoma, who received primary radiotherapy. In addition, the doses at the ICRU rectum reference point was compared to the results of in vivo measurements in the rectum. The in vivo measurements were by factor 1.5 below the doses determined for the ICRU rectum reference point (4.05 +/- 0.68 Gy versus 6.11 +/- 1.63 Gy). Reasons for this were: calibration errors, non-orthogonal radiographs, movement of applicator and probe in the time span between X-ray and application, missing connection of probe and anterior rectal wall. The standard deviation of calculations at ICRU reference points was on average +/- 30%. Possible reasons for the relatively large standard deviation were difficulties in defining the points, identifying them on radiographs and the different locations of the applicators. Although 3 D CT, US or MR based treatment planning using dose volume histogram analysis is more and more established, this simple procedure of marking and digitising the ICRU reference points lengthened treatment planning only by 5 to 10 minutes. The advantages of in vivo dosimetry are easy practicability and the possibility to determine rectum doses during radiation. The advantages of computer-aided planning at ICRU reference points are that calculations are available before radiation and that they can still be taken into account for treatment planning. Both methods should be applied in HDR-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌hdr近距离放射治疗ICRU参考点剂量学分析。
膀胱和直肠的体内剂量测定以及ICRU报告后建议参考点的剂量确定有助于保证宫颈癌高dr近距离放射治疗的质量,特别是最小化副作用。为了获得直肠、膀胱、输尿管和局部淋巴结ICRU参考点的辐射暴露信息,通过11例接受初次放疗的宫颈癌患者的正交x线片计算(数字化)。此外,还将ICRU直肠参考点的剂量与直肠体内测量结果进行了比较。体内测量值比ICRU直肠参考点确定的剂量低1.5倍(4.05 +/- 0.68 Gy对6.11 +/- 1.63 Gy)。造成这种情况的原因有:校准误差、x线片非正交、x线片与探头在应用时间间隔内移动、探头与直肠前壁未连接。在ICRU参考点计算的标准差平均为+/- 30%。造成相对较大标准偏差的可能原因是难以确定点、在x光片上识别点以及涂抹器的不同位置。虽然使用剂量体积直方图分析的基于3d CT、US或MR的治疗计划越来越成熟,但这种简单的标记和数字化ICRU参考点的程序只延长了5到10分钟的治疗计划。体内剂量法的优点是易于实用,并且可以确定放射过程中直肠的剂量。ICRU参考点的计算机辅助计划的优点是,在放疗前就可以进行计算,并且仍然可以在制定治疗计划时加以考虑。两种方法均可应用于宫颈癌的近距离放射治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Primary sclerosing cholangitis]. [Pancreas divisum]. Kosmetische Ergebnisse nach brusterhaltender, radiologischer Mammakarzinomtherapie bei Patientinnen mit intramammären Seromen Arterielles popliteales Entrapment Syndrom (PAES) — ein Fallbericht zur Differentialdiagnose der Claudicatio intermittens Verfeinertes Staging von hilusnahen Bronchialkarzinomen durch EKG-gegatete Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT - Fallbeschreibung
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1