Collaborative study for establishment of a global standard for the potency assay of human anti-D immunoglobulin.

Pharmeuropa bio Pub Date : 2004-01-01
S J Thorpe, D Sands, B Fox, G Schäffner, M W Yu, M-E Behr-Gross
{"title":"Collaborative study for establishment of a global standard for the potency assay of human anti-D immunoglobulin.","authors":"S J Thorpe,&nbsp;D Sands,&nbsp;B Fox,&nbsp;G Schäffner,&nbsp;M W Yu,&nbsp;M-E Behr-Gross","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An international collaborative study aimed at establishing a global standard for the potency assay of anti-D immunoglobulin was started in 2002. 25 laboratories participated in this study run under the common aegis of the World Health Organization, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM). The potencies of three candidate materials and the US-FDA standard (lot 3) included for comparison were evaluated using AutoAnalyzer, competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (competitive EIA), flow cytometric methods or own \"in-house\" methods. Critical reagent, standardised procedures and standardised assay design were provided for either method, where appropriate. Central statistical evaluation of the potency data submitted by the participants was performed using a parallel line model. Agreement between laboratories and assay methods for all samples was observed. Intra-laboratory variability was lowest for laboratories performing flow cytometry and highest for laboratories that performed their in-house methods. Inter-laboratory variability was acceptable for all samples when assayed by AutoAnalyzer, competitive (EIA) and flow cytometric methods. It was concluded that sample A is most suitable to serve as a global standard and that sample C could serve as a reserve European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch provided that suitable stability is demonstrated. Sample A was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission at its 115th session (March 2003) as the first Ph. Eur. BRP (available from the EDQM: catalog number Y0000219) with the assigned potency of 285 IU/ampoule.</p>","PeriodicalId":86996,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio","volume":"2003 2","pages":"9-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An international collaborative study aimed at establishing a global standard for the potency assay of anti-D immunoglobulin was started in 2002. 25 laboratories participated in this study run under the common aegis of the World Health Organization, the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM). The potencies of three candidate materials and the US-FDA standard (lot 3) included for comparison were evaluated using AutoAnalyzer, competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (competitive EIA), flow cytometric methods or own "in-house" methods. Critical reagent, standardised procedures and standardised assay design were provided for either method, where appropriate. Central statistical evaluation of the potency data submitted by the participants was performed using a parallel line model. Agreement between laboratories and assay methods for all samples was observed. Intra-laboratory variability was lowest for laboratories performing flow cytometry and highest for laboratories that performed their in-house methods. Inter-laboratory variability was acceptable for all samples when assayed by AutoAnalyzer, competitive (EIA) and flow cytometric methods. It was concluded that sample A is most suitable to serve as a global standard and that sample C could serve as a reserve European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch provided that suitable stability is demonstrated. Sample A was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission at its 115th session (March 2003) as the first Ph. Eur. BRP (available from the EDQM: catalog number Y0000219) with the assigned potency of 285 IU/ampoule.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立人抗d免疫球蛋白效价测定全球标准的合作研究。
一项旨在建立抗d免疫球蛋白效价测定全球标准的国际合作研究于2002年启动。25个实验室参加了在世界卫生组织、美国食品和药物管理局(US-FDA)和欧洲药品质量管理局(EDQM)共同支持下进行的这项研究。使用AutoAnalyzer、竞争性酶联免疫分析(competitive EIA)、流式细胞术方法或自己的“内部”方法评估了三种候选材料和美国fda标准(批号3)的效力。在适当的情况下,为两种方法提供了关键试剂、标准化程序和标准化分析设计。使用平行线模型对参与者提交的效价数据进行中央统计评估。观察到所有样品的实验室和分析方法之间的一致性。采用流式细胞术的实验室内部变异性最低,而采用内部方法的实验室内部变异性最高。当使用AutoAnalyzer、EIA和流式细胞术检测时,所有样品的实验室间变异性均可接受。结果表明,样品A最适合作为全球标准,样品C可作为欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)的备用。生物参比制剂(BRP)批,前提是证明了合适的稳定性。样品A被Eur博士采用。委员会第115届会议(2003年3月)上的第一任博士。BRP(可从EDQM获得:目录号Y0000219),指定效价为285 IU/安瓿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Establishment of replacement batches for prekallikrein activator in albumin biological reference preparation. Evaluation of two serological methods for potency testing of whole cell pertussis vaccines. Collaborative study for the establishment of replacement batches for human coagulation factor IX concentrate reference standards. Determination of Oversulphated Chondroitin Sulphate and Dermatan Sulphate in unfractionated heparin by (1)H-NMR - Collaborative study for quantification and analytical determination of LoD. Biological activity of EDQM CRS for Interferon alfa-2a and Interferon alfa-2b - assessment in two in vitro bioassays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1