Effect of irbesartan monotherapy compared with ACE inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers on patient compliance in essential hypertension patients: a multicenter, open-labeled, three-armed study.

Blood pressure. Supplement Pub Date : 2005-07-01
Nevres Koylan, Esmeray Acarturk, Aykan Canberk, Nail Caglar, Sali Caglar, Serap Erdine, Sema Guneri, Baris Ilerigelen, Giray Kabakci, Remzi Onder, Olcay Sagkan, Kemalettin Buyukozturk
{"title":"Effect of irbesartan monotherapy compared with ACE inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers on patient compliance in essential hypertension patients: a multicenter, open-labeled, three-armed study.","authors":"Nevres Koylan,&nbsp;Esmeray Acarturk,&nbsp;Aykan Canberk,&nbsp;Nail Caglar,&nbsp;Sali Caglar,&nbsp;Serap Erdine,&nbsp;Sema Guneri,&nbsp;Baris Ilerigelen,&nbsp;Giray Kabakci,&nbsp;Remzi Onder,&nbsp;Olcay Sagkan,&nbsp;Kemalettin Buyukozturk","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This multicenter, three-armed, open-labeled study investigated patient compliance of patients receiving irbesartan, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium-channel blockers (CCB) for essential hypertension for a 6-month period. Patients were either newly diagnosed or switched from existing antihypertensive medication due to lack of efficacy or side-effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were started monotherapy with irbesartan (n=377), ACE inhibitors (n=298) or CCB (n=308) and were reevaluated on 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of the treatment. The primary endpoint was patient compliance, assessed by proportion of patients who had taken their study medication every day. Efficacy was recorded as mean reductions in blood pressure and the proportion of patients whose blood pressure normalized. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly more patients receiving irbesartan had complied with study medication after 3 and 6 months of treatment than ACE inhibitors or CCB. Significantly fewer patients receiving irbesartan needed to change their antihypertensive medication. All three study treatments exhibited similar efficacy profiles, but irbesartan had significantly less adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that patient compliance to irbesartan was significantly superior to other study treatments. Irbesartan is therefore a suitable first-line therapy for essential hypertension in everyday clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"1 ","pages":"23-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This multicenter, three-armed, open-labeled study investigated patient compliance of patients receiving irbesartan, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium-channel blockers (CCB) for essential hypertension for a 6-month period. Patients were either newly diagnosed or switched from existing antihypertensive medication due to lack of efficacy or side-effects.

Methods: Patients were started monotherapy with irbesartan (n=377), ACE inhibitors (n=298) or CCB (n=308) and were reevaluated on 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of the treatment. The primary endpoint was patient compliance, assessed by proportion of patients who had taken their study medication every day. Efficacy was recorded as mean reductions in blood pressure and the proportion of patients whose blood pressure normalized. Tolerability was assessed by reported adverse events.

Results: Significantly more patients receiving irbesartan had complied with study medication after 3 and 6 months of treatment than ACE inhibitors or CCB. Significantly fewer patients receiving irbesartan needed to change their antihypertensive medication. All three study treatments exhibited similar efficacy profiles, but irbesartan had significantly less adverse events.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that patient compliance to irbesartan was significantly superior to other study treatments. Irbesartan is therefore a suitable first-line therapy for essential hypertension in everyday clinical practice.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厄贝沙坦单药治疗与ACE抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂对原发性高血压患者依从性的影响:一项多中心、开放标记、三臂研究
目的:这项多中心、三组、开放标签的研究调查了接受厄贝沙坦、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)治疗原发性高血压患者6个月的依从性。患者要么是新诊断的,要么是由于缺乏疗效或副作用而从现有的抗高血压药物中切换过来的。方法:患者开始厄贝沙坦(n=377), ACE抑制剂(n=298)或CCB (n=308)的单药治疗,并在治疗的第1、3和6个月重新评估。主要终点是患者的依从性,通过每天服用研究药物的患者比例来评估。疗效记录为血压的平均降低和血压恢复正常的患者比例。通过报告的不良事件来评估耐受性。结果:接受厄贝沙坦治疗的患者在治疗3个月和6个月后的依从性明显高于ACE抑制剂或CCB。接受厄贝沙坦治疗的患者需要改变抗高血压药物的人数明显减少。所有三种研究治疗都显示出相似的疗效,但厄贝沙坦的不良事件显著减少。结论:本研究表明,患者对厄贝沙坦的依从性明显优于其他研究治疗。因此,厄贝沙坦在日常临床实践中是原发性高血压的一种合适的一线治疗药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-registration studies for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs. Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study. Efficacy and safety of early versus late titration of fixed-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide: ACTUAL study. Clevidipine for severe hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: a VELOCITY trial analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1