Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial.

Padmini Devi, Denis Xavier, Alben Sigamani, Sudhanshu Pandey, Tinku Thomas, Sreenivas Murthy, Kamal Sharma, Balraj Bosco, Ketan Mehta, Sindhu Joshi, Rajeev Gupta, Girija Singh, Jagadish Hiremath, Chadha Ds, Ashokan Nambiar, Prem Pais
{"title":"Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Padmini Devi,&nbsp;Denis Xavier,&nbsp;Alben Sigamani,&nbsp;Sudhanshu Pandey,&nbsp;Tinku Thomas,&nbsp;Sreenivas Murthy,&nbsp;Kamal Sharma,&nbsp;Balraj Bosco,&nbsp;Ketan Mehta,&nbsp;Sindhu Joshi,&nbsp;Rajeev Gupta,&nbsp;Girija Singh,&nbsp;Jagadish Hiremath,&nbsp;Chadha Ds,&nbsp;Ashokan Nambiar,&nbsp;Prem Pais","doi":"10.3109/08037051.2011.617040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare two strengths of a fixed drug combination (FDC) containing metoprolol XL and amlodipine (metoprolol/amlodipine 50/5; and metoprolol/amlodipine 25/2.5) with its components in hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted this multicentre, randomized, open-label, trial in Indian patients with hypertension (140-180 mmHg/90-114 mmHg) in 11 centres from nine cities. Eligible patients (n = 402) were randomized into one of five treatment groups (metoprolol XL 50 mg + amlodipine 5 mg, metoprolol XL 25 mg + amlodipine 2.5 mg, metoprolol XL 50 mg, metoprolol XL 25 mg or amlodipine 5 mg) and treated for 8 weeks with five follow-up visits to record blood pressure (BP) and clinical status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, treatment groups were well balanced; mean +/- SD BP was 154.87 +/- 11.91/96.63 +/- 6.97 mmHg. The greatest reduction in BP from baseline to 8 weeks was seen in the high-dose FDC group (23.61/14.91 mmHg; p<0.001). The remaining 4 groups too demonstrated a significant reduction (p< 0.001): low-dose FDC - 22.29/ - 14.66; metoprolol 50, - 23.17/ - 13.37; metoprolol 25,- 18.41/ 12.50 and amlodipine 5, - 23.01/- 13.08. BP reductions by FDCs, however, were not statistically superior to monotherapies. Responder rates (sitting diastolic BP< 90 mmHg or reduction > or =10 mmHg) were 93% in the high-dose FDC group and 97% in the low-dose FDC group, and control rates (sitting BP < 140/90 mmHg) were 66% and 58%, respectively. These rates were higher than that seen in individual components. There were no reports of serious adverse events related to study medications. One each from the low-dose FDC and metoprolol 25 mg group discontinued because of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FDCs of metoprolol and amlodipine are effective and safe in mild to moderate hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"2 ","pages":"5-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08037051.2011.617040","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2011.617040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Aim: To compare two strengths of a fixed drug combination (FDC) containing metoprolol XL and amlodipine (metoprolol/amlodipine 50/5; and metoprolol/amlodipine 25/2.5) with its components in hypertension.

Methods: We conducted this multicentre, randomized, open-label, trial in Indian patients with hypertension (140-180 mmHg/90-114 mmHg) in 11 centres from nine cities. Eligible patients (n = 402) were randomized into one of five treatment groups (metoprolol XL 50 mg + amlodipine 5 mg, metoprolol XL 25 mg + amlodipine 2.5 mg, metoprolol XL 50 mg, metoprolol XL 25 mg or amlodipine 5 mg) and treated for 8 weeks with five follow-up visits to record blood pressure (BP) and clinical status.

Results: At baseline, treatment groups were well balanced; mean +/- SD BP was 154.87 +/- 11.91/96.63 +/- 6.97 mmHg. The greatest reduction in BP from baseline to 8 weeks was seen in the high-dose FDC group (23.61/14.91 mmHg; p<0.001). The remaining 4 groups too demonstrated a significant reduction (p< 0.001): low-dose FDC - 22.29/ - 14.66; metoprolol 50, - 23.17/ - 13.37; metoprolol 25,- 18.41/ 12.50 and amlodipine 5, - 23.01/- 13.08. BP reductions by FDCs, however, were not statistically superior to monotherapies. Responder rates (sitting diastolic BP< 90 mmHg or reduction > or =10 mmHg) were 93% in the high-dose FDC group and 97% in the low-dose FDC group, and control rates (sitting BP < 140/90 mmHg) were 66% and 58%, respectively. These rates were higher than that seen in individual components. There were no reports of serious adverse events related to study medications. One each from the low-dose FDC and metoprolol 25 mg group discontinued because of adverse events.

Conclusions: FDCs of metoprolol and amlodipine are effective and safe in mild to moderate hypertension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美托洛尔和氨氯地平固定剂量联合治疗原发性高血压的疗效:MARS——一项随机对照试验
目的:比较美托洛尔XL与氨氯地平固定联合用药(美托洛尔/氨氯地平50/5;美托洛尔/氨氯地平(25/2.5)及其成分在高血压中的作用。方法:我们在印度9个城市的11个中心对高血压(140-180 mmHg/90-114 mmHg)患者进行了这项多中心、随机、开放标签的试验。符合条件的患者(n = 402)随机分为5个治疗组(美托洛尔XL 50 mg +氨氯地平5 mg、美托洛尔XL 25 mg +氨氯地平2.5 mg、美托洛尔XL 50 mg、美托洛尔XL 25 mg或氨氯地平5 mg),治疗8周,随访5次,记录血压和临床状况。结果:在基线时,各治疗组平衡良好;平均+/- SD BP为154.87 +/- 11.91/96.63 +/- 6.97 mmHg。从基线到8周,降压最大的是高剂量FDC组(23.61/14.91 mmHg;p或=10 mmHg)高剂量FDC组为93%,低剂量FDC组为97%,控制率(坐BP < 140/90 mmHg)分别为66%和58%。这些比率高于单个成分的比率。没有与研究药物相关的严重不良事件的报道。低剂量FDC组和美托洛尔25毫克组各有1例因不良事件停用。结论:美托洛尔、氨氯地平治疗轻中度高血压有效、安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-registration studies for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs. Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study. Efficacy and safety of early versus late titration of fixed-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide: ACTUAL study. Clevidipine for severe hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: a VELOCITY trial analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1