Accounting for quiescent cells in tumour growth and cancer treatment.

J A Florian, J L Eiseman, R S Parker
{"title":"Accounting for quiescent cells in tumour growth and cancer treatment.","authors":"J A Florian,&nbsp;J L Eiseman,&nbsp;R S Parker","doi":"10.1049/ip-syb:20050041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A four-state cell-cycle model with explicit G1-phase representation, termed the quiescent-cell model (QCM), has been proposed to represent biologically the G1-phase specific effect of the chemotherapeutic tamoxifen. The QCM was used to model untreated and tamoxifen-treated tumour xenograft data from the literature with equivalent accuracy to previously developed tumour growth models. Open-loop analysis demonstrated that perturbations to the two newly introduced parameters, kG01 and kG10, significantly altered untreated tumour growth predictions. However, the sensitivity did not carry over to closed-loop simulations, where alterations to kD and kGS proved most significant in determining overall controller performance. Additional mismatch studies comparing controllers designed using the QCM to controllers designed with the Gompertz model and saturating-rate, cell-cycle model returned similar performance for a step-wise tumour reduction case study, but the quiescent-cell controller delivered a more aggressive treatment regimen. More importantly, the Gompertz and saturating-rate, cell-cycle controllers were unable to follow a reference trajectory when measurement updates were made biweekly, with both controllers returning tamoxifen dose schedules alternating between the maximum and minimum allowable dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":87457,"journal":{"name":"Systems biology","volume":"152 4","pages":"185-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1049/ip-syb:20050041","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-syb:20050041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

A four-state cell-cycle model with explicit G1-phase representation, termed the quiescent-cell model (QCM), has been proposed to represent biologically the G1-phase specific effect of the chemotherapeutic tamoxifen. The QCM was used to model untreated and tamoxifen-treated tumour xenograft data from the literature with equivalent accuracy to previously developed tumour growth models. Open-loop analysis demonstrated that perturbations to the two newly introduced parameters, kG01 and kG10, significantly altered untreated tumour growth predictions. However, the sensitivity did not carry over to closed-loop simulations, where alterations to kD and kGS proved most significant in determining overall controller performance. Additional mismatch studies comparing controllers designed using the QCM to controllers designed with the Gompertz model and saturating-rate, cell-cycle model returned similar performance for a step-wise tumour reduction case study, but the quiescent-cell controller delivered a more aggressive treatment regimen. More importantly, the Gompertz and saturating-rate, cell-cycle controllers were unable to follow a reference trajectory when measurement updates were made biweekly, with both controllers returning tamoxifen dose schedules alternating between the maximum and minimum allowable dose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肿瘤生长和癌症治疗中解释静止细胞。
一种具有明确的g1期表征的四状态细胞周期模型,称为静止细胞模型(QCM),已被提出以生物学方式表征化疗药物他莫昔芬的g1期特异性效应。QCM用于模拟文献中未经治疗和他莫昔芬治疗的肿瘤异种移植数据,其准确性与先前开发的肿瘤生长模型相当。开环分析表明,对两个新引入的参数kG01和kG10的扰动显著改变了未经治疗的肿瘤生长预测。然而,灵敏度并没有延续到闭环模拟中,其中kD和kGS的改变被证明在决定整体控制器性能方面是最重要的。另外的不匹配研究将使用QCM设计的控制器与使用Gompertz模型和饱和率、细胞周期模型设计的控制器进行了比较,结果表明,在逐步减少肿瘤的案例研究中,使用QCM设计的控制器获得了相似的性能,但静止细胞控制器提供了更积极的治疗方案。更重要的是,当每两周进行一次测量更新时,Gompertz和饱和率细胞周期控制器无法遵循参考轨迹,两个控制器都在最大和最小允许剂量之间交替返回他莫昔芬剂量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systems theory of Smad signalling. Direct Lyapunov exponent analysis enables parametric study of transient signalling governing cell behaviour. Primary mouse hepatocytes for systems biology approaches: a standardized in vitro system for modelling of signal transduction pathways. Elimination of the initial value parameters when identifying a system close to a Hopf bifurcation. Decreased internalisation of erbB1 mutants in lung cancer is linked with a mechanism conferring sensitivity to gefitinib.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1