The effect of single set resistance training on strength and functional fitness in pulmonary rehabilitation patients.

Wayne T Phillips, Melissa J Benton, Carolyn L Wagner, Cathy Riley
{"title":"The effect of single set resistance training on strength and functional fitness in pulmonary rehabilitation patients.","authors":"Wayne T Phillips,&nbsp;Melissa J Benton,&nbsp;Carolyn L Wagner,&nbsp;Cathy Riley","doi":"10.1097/00008483-200609000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary goal of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is for patients to achieve and maintain their maximum level of independence and functioning in the community. Traditional PR uses a predominantly aerobic/endurance approach to rehabilitation with little or no inclusion of exercises to increase strength. Few studies have investigated the impact of resistance training on PR despite growing evidence supporting its efficacy to improve physical function (functional fitness) in both healthy individuals and those with chronic disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of single-set resistance training on strength and functional fitness outcomes in PR patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty PR patients, 60 to 81 years old, were randomly assigned to an 8-week endurance-based PR program (ET) or an ET plus resistance training program (RT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strength increased in RT (P < .05) and decreased in ET for both upper and lower body. Functional fitness improved (P < .05) in 5 of 7 tests for RT compared with 2 tests for ET.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single set RT can elicit significant improvements in both strength and functional fitness, which is not obtained by traditional PR alone. Our results are comparable to other studies with similar outcomes using multiple-set RT protocols. These findings may have important implications for program design, application, and adherence in PR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00008483-200609000-00011","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-200609000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Purpose: The primary goal of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is for patients to achieve and maintain their maximum level of independence and functioning in the community. Traditional PR uses a predominantly aerobic/endurance approach to rehabilitation with little or no inclusion of exercises to increase strength. Few studies have investigated the impact of resistance training on PR despite growing evidence supporting its efficacy to improve physical function (functional fitness) in both healthy individuals and those with chronic disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of single-set resistance training on strength and functional fitness outcomes in PR patients.

Methods: Twenty PR patients, 60 to 81 years old, were randomly assigned to an 8-week endurance-based PR program (ET) or an ET plus resistance training program (RT).

Results: Strength increased in RT (P < .05) and decreased in ET for both upper and lower body. Functional fitness improved (P < .05) in 5 of 7 tests for RT compared with 2 tests for ET.

Conclusions: Single set RT can elicit significant improvements in both strength and functional fitness, which is not obtained by traditional PR alone. Our results are comparable to other studies with similar outcomes using multiple-set RT protocols. These findings may have important implications for program design, application, and adherence in PR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单组阻力训练对肺部康复患者力量和功能适应度的影响。
目的:肺康复(PR)的主要目标是使患者在社区中达到并保持最大程度的独立性和功能。传统的PR主要使用有氧/耐力方法进行康复,很少或不包括锻炼来增加力量。尽管越来越多的证据支持阻力训练对改善健康个体和慢性病患者的身体功能(功能适应性)的功效,但很少有研究调查阻力训练对PR的影响。本研究的目的是探讨单组阻力训练对PR患者力量和功能健康结果的影响。方法:20例60 ~ 81岁的PR患者被随机分配到为期8周的耐力PR计划(ET)或ET加阻力训练计划(RT)。结果:RT强度增加(P < 0.05), ET降低(P < 0.05)。与2项et测试相比,7项RT测试中有5项功能适应度提高(P < 0.05)。结论:单组RT可以显著提高力量和功能适应度,这是传统PR单独无法获得的。我们的结果与其他使用多集RT协议的类似结果的研究具有可比性。这些发现可能对PR的方案设计、应用和依从性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic approach to improve lipids in coronary artery disease patients participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program. The American Heart Association CPR Anytime Program: the potential impact of highly accessible training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Closing the cholesterol treatment gap: cardiac rehabilitation can make a difference. Five-year changes in North Carolina outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Correlates of physical activity change in patients not attending cardiac rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1