Five-year changes in North Carolina outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.

Kelly R Evenson, Anna Johnson, Semra A Aytur
{"title":"Five-year changes in North Carolina outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.","authors":"Kelly R Evenson,&nbsp;Anna Johnson,&nbsp;Semra A Aytur","doi":"10.1097/00008483-200611000-00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to describe cardiac rehabilitation programming, barriers to participation, and reasons for dropout in North Carolina from a program director's perspective and to compare those results with those of a similar statewide survey conducted 5 years earlier.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 1999 and 2004, a survey was mailed to all North Carolina program directors of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs. The response rate was 85% (61/72) in 1999 and 79% (61/77) in 2004.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 85% of North Carolinians older than 40 years lived within a 15-mile buffer of an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program in 2004. Most programs were staffed with personnel trained in nursing, exercise physiology, and nutrition in 1999 and 2004. Women and African Americans remained disproportionately underrepresented as participants in the program for both years. In 2004, approximately one third of cardiac rehabilitation programs reported having a referral to rehabilitation on the hospital discharge plan for myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass surgery. In 1999 and 2004, the most frequently reported barrier to participation remained financial, followed by lack of interest or motivation and workplace conflicts. Work conflicts, lack of interest, and comorbidities were the most frequently reported reasons for dropping out from cardiac rehabilitation programs in both 1999 and 2004.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs by addressing barriers at multiple levels may facilitate greater patient participation. This statewide survey could be used in other states as a surveillance tool, to track changes in rehabilitation over time from a program director's perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":15203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation","volume":"26 6","pages":"366-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00008483-200611000-00006","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-200611000-00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe cardiac rehabilitation programming, barriers to participation, and reasons for dropout in North Carolina from a program director's perspective and to compare those results with those of a similar statewide survey conducted 5 years earlier.

Methods: In 1999 and 2004, a survey was mailed to all North Carolina program directors of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs. The response rate was 85% (61/72) in 1999 and 79% (61/77) in 2004.

Results: More than 85% of North Carolinians older than 40 years lived within a 15-mile buffer of an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program in 2004. Most programs were staffed with personnel trained in nursing, exercise physiology, and nutrition in 1999 and 2004. Women and African Americans remained disproportionately underrepresented as participants in the program for both years. In 2004, approximately one third of cardiac rehabilitation programs reported having a referral to rehabilitation on the hospital discharge plan for myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass surgery. In 1999 and 2004, the most frequently reported barrier to participation remained financial, followed by lack of interest or motivation and workplace conflicts. Work conflicts, lack of interest, and comorbidities were the most frequently reported reasons for dropping out from cardiac rehabilitation programs in both 1999 and 2004.

Conclusions: Increasing participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs by addressing barriers at multiple levels may facilitate greater patient participation. This statewide survey could be used in other states as a surveillance tool, to track changes in rehabilitation over time from a program director's perspective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北卡罗来纳州门诊心脏康复的五年变化。
目的:本研究的目的是从项目主管的角度描述北卡罗来纳州的心脏康复项目、参与的障碍和辍学的原因,并将这些结果与5年前进行的类似全州调查的结果进行比较。方法:在1999年和2004年,一份调查问卷邮寄给北卡罗莱纳州门诊心脏康复项目的所有项目主任。1999年的有效率为85%(61/72),2004年为79%(61/77)。结果:2004年,超过85%的40岁以上的北卡罗来纳人居住在一个门诊心脏康复项目的15英里缓冲区内。1999年和2004年,大多数项目都配备了受过护理、运动生理学和营养学培训的人员。妇女和非裔美国人在这两年的参与人数仍然不成比例地不足。2004年,大约三分之一的心脏康复项目报告说,因心肌梗死和冠状动脉搭桥手术而在出院计划中有转介到康复中心。在1999年和2004年,最常见的参与障碍仍然是经济上的,其次是缺乏兴趣或动力以及工作场所的冲突。在1999年和2004年,工作冲突、缺乏兴趣和合并症是退出心脏康复计划最常见的原因。结论:通过解决多个层面的障碍来增加心脏康复计划的参与可能会促进更多的患者参与。这项全州范围的调查可以在其他州作为监督工具使用,从项目主管的角度跟踪康复的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic approach to improve lipids in coronary artery disease patients participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program. The American Heart Association CPR Anytime Program: the potential impact of highly accessible training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Closing the cholesterol treatment gap: cardiac rehabilitation can make a difference. Five-year changes in North Carolina outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Correlates of physical activity change in patients not attending cardiac rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1