A systematic approach to improve lipids in coronary artery disease patients participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program.

Sophia Boudoulas Meis, Richard Snow, Michelle Lalonde, James Falko, Teresa Caulin-Glaser
{"title":"A systematic approach to improve lipids in coronary artery disease patients participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program.","authors":"Sophia Boudoulas Meis,&nbsp;Richard Snow,&nbsp;Michelle Lalonde,&nbsp;James Falko,&nbsp;Teresa Caulin-Glaser","doi":"10.1097/00008483-200611000-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of an intervention, directed toward the primary care physician (PCP), to improve the number of patients treated to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post intervention cohort comparison using data collected from participants in a CR program with LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL at entry. The control cohort participated in CR between 1/00 and 10/02, 41.5% (n = 178) had an entry LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL. The intervention cohort participated in CR between 10/03 and 1/05, 26.4% (n = 67) had an entry LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL. The intervention group had identical treatment as the control group as well as the following: each participant with an LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL in the intervention cohort had an entry letter sent to his or her cardiologist and PCP from the programs Cardiology Medical Director, detailing the lipid goals and therapeutic options. In addition, monthly faxes on progress toward lipid goals were sent to the PCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control cohort was less likely to achieve LDL-C goal compared with the intervention cohort (43% vs 67%, respectively; P = .001). A patient was also less likely to have a lipid medication change during CR in the control group compared with the intervention group (29% vs 42%, respectively; P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of systematic reminders directed at the PCP during CR can substantially increase the percentage of patients achieving nationally recognized LDL-C goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00008483-200611000-00003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-200611000-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of an intervention, directed toward the primary care physician (PCP), to improve the number of patients treated to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) population.

Methods: A pre-post intervention cohort comparison using data collected from participants in a CR program with LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL at entry. The control cohort participated in CR between 1/00 and 10/02, 41.5% (n = 178) had an entry LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL. The intervention cohort participated in CR between 10/03 and 1/05, 26.4% (n = 67) had an entry LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL. The intervention group had identical treatment as the control group as well as the following: each participant with an LDL-C > or =100 mg/dL in the intervention cohort had an entry letter sent to his or her cardiologist and PCP from the programs Cardiology Medical Director, detailing the lipid goals and therapeutic options. In addition, monthly faxes on progress toward lipid goals were sent to the PCP.

Results: The control cohort was less likely to achieve LDL-C goal compared with the intervention cohort (43% vs 67%, respectively; P = .001). A patient was also less likely to have a lipid medication change during CR in the control group compared with the intervention group (29% vs 42%, respectively; P = .05).

Conclusion: Use of systematic reminders directed at the PCP during CR can substantially increase the percentage of patients achieving nationally recognized LDL-C goals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与心脏康复计划的冠心病患者血脂改善的系统方法。
目的:确定一项针对初级保健医生(PCP)的干预措施的有效性,以提高心脏康复(CR)人群中接受低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)治疗的患者数量。方法:使用从CR项目中LDL-C >或=100 mg/dL的参与者收集的数据进行干预前后队列比较。对照组在1/00至10/02期间参加了CR, 41.5% (n = 178)的患者进入时LDL-C >或=100 mg/dL。在2003年10月至2005年1月参与CR的干预队列中,26.4% (n = 67)的入组LDL-C >或=100 mg/dL。干预组采用与对照组相同的治疗方法,并采取以下措施:干预组中LDL-C >或=100 mg/dL的每位参与者都收到了心脏病医学主任发给他或她的心脏病专家和PCP的入学信,详细说明了血脂目标和治疗方案。此外,每月向PCP发送有关脂质目标进展的报告。结果:与干预组相比,对照组达到LDL-C目标的可能性较低(分别为43%对67%;P = .001)。与干预组相比,对照组患者在CR期间发生脂质药物变化的可能性也较小(分别为29%对42%;P = 0.05)。结论:在CR期间使用针对PCP的系统提醒可以大大提高患者达到国家认可的LDL-C目标的百分比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic approach to improve lipids in coronary artery disease patients participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program. The American Heart Association CPR Anytime Program: the potential impact of highly accessible training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Closing the cholesterol treatment gap: cardiac rehabilitation can make a difference. Five-year changes in North Carolina outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Correlates of physical activity change in patients not attending cardiac rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1