An eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose amlodipine/benazepril combination in comparison with amlodipine as first-line therapy in chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Blood pressure. Supplement Pub Date : 2008-06-01
Kwo-Chang Ueng, Lung-Chun Lin, Wen-Chol Voon, Ming-Cheng Lin, Yen-Bin Liu, Ho-Ming Su, Po-Yuan Chang, Tsung-Hsien Lin, Wei-Liang Chen, Chau-Chung Wu, Wen-Ter Lai, Chung-Sheng Lin
{"title":"An eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose amlodipine/benazepril combination in comparison with amlodipine as first-line therapy in chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension.","authors":"Kwo-Chang Ueng,&nbsp;Lung-Chun Lin,&nbsp;Wen-Chol Voon,&nbsp;Ming-Cheng Lin,&nbsp;Yen-Bin Liu,&nbsp;Ho-Ming Su,&nbsp;Po-Yuan Chang,&nbsp;Tsung-Hsien Lin,&nbsp;Wei-Liang Chen,&nbsp;Chau-Chung Wu,&nbsp;Wen-Ter Lai,&nbsp;Chung-Sheng Lin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study sought to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination with amlodipine/benazepril with that of amlodipine monotherapy in Chinese hypertensive subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This multicenter, double-blind, 8-week study randomized 111 patients to fixed-dose amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl (2.5/5 mg/day titrated to 5/10 mg/day as needed at week 4 to reach goal blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg) or amlodipine besylate monotherapy (5 mg/day titrated to 10 mg/day as needed). At week 8, patients randomized to combination therapy compared with monotherapy had a comparable BP control rate (56.0% vs. 46.2%; p = 0.32). Fixed-dose combination resulted in similar reductions in sitting systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) compared with monotherapy (SBP: -19.3 +/- 12.5 vs. -20.9 +/- 13.3 mmHg; DBP: -9.2 +/- 10.4 vs. -11.3 +/-9.3 mmHg; both p=NS). Safety profiles did not differ between groups, but cough was more common in the combination group (11.0% vs. 0%; p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this group of patients, comparable antihypertensive effects were seen with the fixed-dose combination therapy, compared with amlodipine monotherapy. Both treatments appeared well tolerated in the studied population, but cough was more common in the fixed-dose combination group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8974,"journal":{"name":"Blood pressure. Supplement","volume":"1 ","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood pressure. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study sought to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination with amlodipine/benazepril with that of amlodipine monotherapy in Chinese hypertensive subjects.

Results: This multicenter, double-blind, 8-week study randomized 111 patients to fixed-dose amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl (2.5/5 mg/day titrated to 5/10 mg/day as needed at week 4 to reach goal blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg) or amlodipine besylate monotherapy (5 mg/day titrated to 10 mg/day as needed). At week 8, patients randomized to combination therapy compared with monotherapy had a comparable BP control rate (56.0% vs. 46.2%; p = 0.32). Fixed-dose combination resulted in similar reductions in sitting systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) compared with monotherapy (SBP: -19.3 +/- 12.5 vs. -20.9 +/- 13.3 mmHg; DBP: -9.2 +/- 10.4 vs. -11.3 +/-9.3 mmHg; both p=NS). Safety profiles did not differ between groups, but cough was more common in the combination group (11.0% vs. 0%; p = 0.013).

Conclusions: In this group of patients, comparable antihypertensive effects were seen with the fixed-dose combination therapy, compared with amlodipine monotherapy. Both treatments appeared well tolerated in the studied population, but cough was more common in the fixed-dose combination group.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项为期8周、多中心、随机、双盲研究,旨在评估固定剂量氨氯地平/苯那普利联合应用与氨氯地平作为一线治疗对中国轻中度高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。
目的:本研究旨在比较氨氯地平/苯那普利固定剂量联合治疗与氨氯地平单药治疗在中国高血压患者中的降压疗效和耐受性。结果:这项多中心、双盲、为期8周的研究将111例患者随机分配到固定剂量的苯磺酸氨氯地平/盐酸苯那普利(2.5/ 5mg /天,根据第4周的需要滴定到5/ 10mg /天,以达到目标血压(BP)。结论:在这组患者中,与氨氯地平单药治疗相比,固定剂量联合治疗的降压效果相当。两种治疗在研究人群中耐受性良好,但咳嗽在固定剂量联合组中更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-registration studies for the evaluation of antihypertensive drugs. Effect of fixed dose combinations of metoprolol and amlodipine in essential hypertension: MARS--a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of valsartan in hypertensive Taiwanese patients: post-marketing surveillance study. Efficacy and safety of early versus late titration of fixed-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide: ACTUAL study. Clevidipine for severe hypertension in patients with renal dysfunction: a VELOCITY trial analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1