Comparison of electrically mediated and liposome-complexed plasmid DNA delivery to the skin.

Loree C Heller, Mark J Jaroszeski, Domenico Coppola, Richard Heller
{"title":"Comparison of electrically mediated and liposome-complexed plasmid DNA delivery to the skin.","authors":"Loree C Heller,&nbsp;Mark J Jaroszeski,&nbsp;Domenico Coppola,&nbsp;Richard Heller","doi":"10.1186/1479-0556-6-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electroporation is an established technique for enhancing plasmid delivery to many tissues in vivo, including the skin. We have previously demonstrated efficient delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin utilizing a custom-built four-plate electrode. The experiments described here further evaluate cutaneous plasmid delivery using in vivo electroporation. Plasmid expression levels are compared to those after liposome mediated delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enhanced electrically-mediated delivery, and less extensively, liposome complexed delivery, of a plasmid encoding the reporter luciferase was tested in rodent skin. Expression kinetics and tissue damage were explored as well as testing in a second rodent model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experiments confirm that electroporation alone is more effective in enhancing reporter gene expression than plasmid injection alone, plasmid conjugation with liposomes followed by injection, or than the combination of liposomes and electroporation. However, with two time courses of multiple electrically-mediated plasmid deliveries, neither the levels nor duration of transgene expression are significantly increased. Tissue damage may increase following a second treatment, no further damage is observed after a third treatment. When electroporation conditions utilized in a mouse model are tested in thicker rat skin, only higher field strengths or longer pulses were as effective in plasmid delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electroporation enhances reporter plasmid delivery to the skin to a greater extent than the liposome conjugation method tested. Multiple deliveries do not necessarily result in higher or longer term expression. In addition, some impact on tissue integrity with respect to surface damage is observed. Pulsing conditions should be optimized for the model and for the expression profile desired.</p>","PeriodicalId":12596,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Vaccines and Therapy","volume":"6 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1479-0556-6-16","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Vaccines and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-6-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background: Electroporation is an established technique for enhancing plasmid delivery to many tissues in vivo, including the skin. We have previously demonstrated efficient delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin utilizing a custom-built four-plate electrode. The experiments described here further evaluate cutaneous plasmid delivery using in vivo electroporation. Plasmid expression levels are compared to those after liposome mediated delivery.

Methods: Enhanced electrically-mediated delivery, and less extensively, liposome complexed delivery, of a plasmid encoding the reporter luciferase was tested in rodent skin. Expression kinetics and tissue damage were explored as well as testing in a second rodent model.

Results: Experiments confirm that electroporation alone is more effective in enhancing reporter gene expression than plasmid injection alone, plasmid conjugation with liposomes followed by injection, or than the combination of liposomes and electroporation. However, with two time courses of multiple electrically-mediated plasmid deliveries, neither the levels nor duration of transgene expression are significantly increased. Tissue damage may increase following a second treatment, no further damage is observed after a third treatment. When electroporation conditions utilized in a mouse model are tested in thicker rat skin, only higher field strengths or longer pulses were as effective in plasmid delivery.

Conclusion: Electroporation enhances reporter plasmid delivery to the skin to a greater extent than the liposome conjugation method tested. Multiple deliveries do not necessarily result in higher or longer term expression. In addition, some impact on tissue integrity with respect to surface damage is observed. Pulsing conditions should be optimized for the model and for the expression profile desired.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电介导和脂质体复合质粒DNA递送到皮肤的比较。
背景:电穿孔是一种成熟的技术,用于增强质粒在体内许多组织中的传递,包括皮肤。我们之前已经展示了利用定制的四板电极将质粒DNA有效地传递到皮肤上。本文描述的实验进一步评估了使用体内电穿孔的皮肤质粒递送。质粒表达水平与脂质体介导递送后的表达水平进行比较。方法:在啮齿动物皮肤中测试了编码报告荧光素酶的质粒的增强电介导递送,以及较少广泛的脂质体复合递送。表达动力学和组织损伤进行了探索,并在第二个啮齿动物模型中进行了测试。结果:实验证实,单独电穿孔比单独注射质粒、质粒与脂质体结合再注射或脂质体与电穿孔联合更有效地增强报告基因的表达。然而,多个电介导质粒递送的两个时间过程中,转基因表达的水平和持续时间都没有显著增加。第二次治疗后组织损伤可能会增加,第三次治疗后没有观察到进一步的损伤。当在小鼠模型中使用的电穿孔条件在较厚的大鼠皮肤中进行测试时,只有更高的场强或更长的脉冲才能有效地传递质粒。结论:电穿孔法比脂质体偶联法更能促进报告质粒向皮肤的传递。多次交付不一定导致更高或更长时间的表达。此外,观察到表面损伤对组织完整性的一些影响。脉冲条件应针对模型和所需的表达剖面进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retraction: Structure based sequence analysis & epitope prediction of gp41 HIV1 envelope glycoprotein isolated in Pakistan. DNA vaccination for prostate cancer, from preclinical to clinical trials - where we stand? Evaluation of the immune responses induced by four targeted DNA vaccines encoding the juvenile liver fluke antigen, cathepsin B in a mouse model. Targeting wild-type Erythrocyte receptors for Plasmodium falciparum and vivax Merozoites by Zinc Finger Nucleases In- silico: Towards a Genetic Vaccine against Malaria. A brief review on dengue molecular virology, diagnosis, treatment and prevalence in Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1