Measurement of fracture toughness by nanoindentation methods: Recent advances and future challenges

IF 12.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cossms.2015.04.003
M. Sebastiani , K.E. Johanns , E.G. Herbert , G.M. Pharr
{"title":"Measurement of fracture toughness by nanoindentation methods: Recent advances and future challenges","authors":"M. Sebastiani ,&nbsp;K.E. Johanns ,&nbsp;E.G. Herbert ,&nbsp;G.M. Pharr","doi":"10.1016/j.cossms.2015.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we describe recent advances and developments for the measurement of fracture toughness at small scales by the use of nanoindentation-based methods including techniques based on micro-cantilever, beam bending and micro-pillar splitting. A critical comparison of the techniques is made by testing a selected group of bulk and thin film materials. For pillar splitting, cohesive zone finite element simulations are used to validate a simple relationship between the critical load at failure, the pillar radius, and the fracture toughness for a range of material properties and coating/substrate combinations. The minimum pillar diameter required for nucleation and growth of a crack during indentation is also estimated. An analysis of pillar splitting for a film on a dissimilar substrate material shows that the critical load for splitting is relatively insensitive to the substrate compliance for a large range of material properties. Experimental results from a selected group of materials show good agreement between single cantilever and pillar splitting methods, while a discrepancy of ∼25% is found between the pillar splitting technique and double-cantilever testing. It is concluded that both the micro-cantilever and pillar splitting techniques are valuable methods for micro-scale assessment of fracture toughness of brittle ceramics, provided the underlying assumptions can be validated. Although the pillar splitting method has some advantages because of the simplicity of sample preparation and testing, it is not applicable to most metals because their higher toughness prevents splitting, and in this case, micro-cantilever bend testing is preferred.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":295,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science","volume":"19 6","pages":"Pages 324-333"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cossms.2015.04.003","citationCount":"168","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359028615000285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 168

Abstract

In this paper, we describe recent advances and developments for the measurement of fracture toughness at small scales by the use of nanoindentation-based methods including techniques based on micro-cantilever, beam bending and micro-pillar splitting. A critical comparison of the techniques is made by testing a selected group of bulk and thin film materials. For pillar splitting, cohesive zone finite element simulations are used to validate a simple relationship between the critical load at failure, the pillar radius, and the fracture toughness for a range of material properties and coating/substrate combinations. The minimum pillar diameter required for nucleation and growth of a crack during indentation is also estimated. An analysis of pillar splitting for a film on a dissimilar substrate material shows that the critical load for splitting is relatively insensitive to the substrate compliance for a large range of material properties. Experimental results from a selected group of materials show good agreement between single cantilever and pillar splitting methods, while a discrepancy of ∼25% is found between the pillar splitting technique and double-cantilever testing. It is concluded that both the micro-cantilever and pillar splitting techniques are valuable methods for micro-scale assessment of fracture toughness of brittle ceramics, provided the underlying assumptions can be validated. Although the pillar splitting method has some advantages because of the simplicity of sample preparation and testing, it is not applicable to most metals because their higher toughness prevents splitting, and in this case, micro-cantilever bend testing is preferred.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用纳米压痕方法测量断裂韧性:最新进展和未来挑战
在本文中,我们描述了利用基于纳米压痕的方法在小尺度上测量断裂韧性的最新进展和发展,包括基于微悬臂、梁弯曲和微柱劈裂的技术。通过测试一组选定的大块材料和薄膜材料,对这些技术进行了关键的比较。对于煤柱劈裂,采用内聚区有限元模拟来验证破坏时临界载荷、煤柱半径和一系列材料性能和涂层/基材组合的断裂韧性之间的简单关系。还估计了在压痕过程中裂纹成核和扩展所需的最小柱直径。对不同衬底材料上薄膜柱劈裂的分析表明,劈裂的临界载荷对衬底顺应性相对不敏感。一组选定材料的实验结果表明,单悬臂梁和柱劈裂方法之间的一致性很好,而柱劈裂技术和双悬臂梁测试之间的差异约为25%。结论表明,只要基本假设能够得到验证,微悬臂和微柱劈裂技术都是脆性陶瓷断裂韧性微尺度评估的有价值的方法。虽然柱劈裂法由于样品制备和测试简单而具有一定的优势,但由于金属的高韧性阻止了劈裂,因此并不适用于大多数金属,在这种情况下,首选微悬臂弯曲试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science
Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
21.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Title: Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science Journal Overview: Aims to provide a snapshot of the latest research and advances in materials science Publishes six issues per year, each containing reviews covering exciting and developing areas of materials science Each issue comprises 2-3 sections of reviews commissioned by international researchers who are experts in their fields Provides materials scientists with the opportunity to stay informed about current developments in their own and related areas of research Promotes cross-fertilization of ideas across an increasingly interdisciplinary field
期刊最新文献
Exploring photosensitive nanomaterials and optoelectronic synapses for neuromorphic artificial vision Conductive Hydrogels: Bioelectronics and Environmental Applications High-affinity peptide biomaterials Optimisation and material considerations of piezoelectric implants for cardiac applications Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1