{"title":"[Evaluations of 5 kinds of China-made enzyme immunoassay kits for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection].","authors":"Yong Zhang, Feng Wang, Jing-Chen Ma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>OBJECTIVE To Screen best EIA kit that fits best for using in serological detection of HBsAg in the national investigation of hepatitis B virus infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Top 5 kinds of kits on the best seller list of China-made HBsAg EIA detection reagents were selected and each was detected the HBsAg panel (63 positive and 90 negative) 5 times. The s/n ratio of each test was recorded and transformed by log (s/n+1). Reliability indices ICC and CV, and validity indices AUC, pAUC and Se(FPR-e) were calculated and compared between each of the kits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The indices of ICC and CV of the 5 kits arranged in the same order of E, C, D, B and A, from the best to the worst, and the differences between them were significantly important (Bootstrap method, P < 0.05); The AUCs ranged from 0.965 to 0.987, and for kits E and B which had the biggest pAUCs, differs significantly from kits A and D (Bootstrap method, P < 0.05). Kit E had the highest Se(FPR-e) which was significantly bigger than kit B (Bootstrap method, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5 kinds of kits are all excellent and kit E is the best.</p>","PeriodicalId":56402,"journal":{"name":"中国疫苗和免疫","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疫苗和免疫","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Unlabelled: OBJECTIVE To Screen best EIA kit that fits best for using in serological detection of HBsAg in the national investigation of hepatitis B virus infection.
Methods: Top 5 kinds of kits on the best seller list of China-made HBsAg EIA detection reagents were selected and each was detected the HBsAg panel (63 positive and 90 negative) 5 times. The s/n ratio of each test was recorded and transformed by log (s/n+1). Reliability indices ICC and CV, and validity indices AUC, pAUC and Se(FPR-e) were calculated and compared between each of the kits.
Results: The indices of ICC and CV of the 5 kits arranged in the same order of E, C, D, B and A, from the best to the worst, and the differences between them were significantly important (Bootstrap method, P < 0.05); The AUCs ranged from 0.965 to 0.987, and for kits E and B which had the biggest pAUCs, differs significantly from kits A and D (Bootstrap method, P < 0.05). Kit E had the highest Se(FPR-e) which was significantly bigger than kit B (Bootstrap method, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The 5 kinds of kits are all excellent and kit E is the best.