SABS G criteria for catastrophic impairment: a psychological perspective.

Health law in Canada Pub Date : 2010-02-01
Brian E Levitt
{"title":"SABS G criteria for catastrophic impairment: a psychological perspective.","authors":"Brian E Levitt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the criteria for catastrophic impairment with respect to mental and behavioural functioning as defined by the Ontario Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule (the \"SABS\") in s. 2(1.1)(g). It reviews the relevant areas of the SABS, along with key arbitrations and court rulings. This article also explores Designated Assessment Centre (\"DAC\") guidelines and conventions as applied to determination of catastrophic mental and behavioural impairment. It concludes with a perspective from rehabilitation psychology, utilizing the framework and approaches offered in the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, fourth edition, 1993 (the \"AMA Guides\"), and offers a comparison with these other sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":79609,"journal":{"name":"Health law in Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health law in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the criteria for catastrophic impairment with respect to mental and behavioural functioning as defined by the Ontario Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule (the "SABS") in s. 2(1.1)(g). It reviews the relevant areas of the SABS, along with key arbitrations and court rulings. This article also explores Designated Assessment Centre ("DAC") guidelines and conventions as applied to determination of catastrophic mental and behavioural impairment. It concludes with a perspective from rehabilitation psychology, utilizing the framework and approaches offered in the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, fourth edition, 1993 (the "AMA Guides"), and offers a comparison with these other sources.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾难性损害的SABS G标准:心理学视角。
本文探讨了安大略省法定事故福利表(“SABS”)在第2(1.1)(g)条中定义的关于精神和行为功能的灾难性损害的标准。它回顾了SABS的相关领域,以及关键的仲裁和法院裁决。本文还探讨了指定评估中心(“DAC”)的指导方针和惯例,用于确定灾难性的精神和行为障碍。最后,本文从康复心理学的角度出发,利用美国医学协会1993年第四版《永久性损伤评估指南》("AMA指南")提供的框架和方法,并与这些其他资料进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plutonormativity: Illuminating Inequities in Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. Part III: Occupational Disability Determination/Rehabilitation Best Practices and the Role of Situational Work Assessment and Simulated Work/Academic Trials. A Need to Know Basis? Canadian Federalism and the Disclosure of Egg and Sperm Donor Identities. Issues of Vulnerability and Equality: The Emerging Need for Court Evaluations of Physicians' Fiduciary Duties in High Stakes End-of-Life Decisions. Editorial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1