Accuracy of a 3D fluoroscopic navigation system using a flat-panel detector-equipped C-arm.

Q Medicine Computer Aided Surgery Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-08-02 DOI:10.3109/10929088.2011.602117
Masaki Takao, Kentaro Yabuta, Takashi Nishii, Takashi Sakai, Nobuhiko Sugano
{"title":"Accuracy of a 3D fluoroscopic navigation system using a flat-panel detector-equipped C-arm.","authors":"Masaki Takao,&nbsp;Kentaro Yabuta,&nbsp;Takashi Nishii,&nbsp;Takashi Sakai,&nbsp;Nobuhiko Sugano","doi":"10.3109/10929088.2011.602117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel 3-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopic navigation system using a flat-panel detector-equipped C-arm, focusing on the influence of the distance from the center of fluoroscopic imaging on navigation accuracy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A geometric phantom was made using a Styrofoam cube with 25 markers, each consisting of a metal ball 1.5 mm in diameter, fixed in a cross arrangement at 1-cm intervals. Hip joint surgery was simulated using a set of dry pelvic and femoral bones. A total of eight markers were fixed to the acetabulum and proximal femur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the geometric phantom study, mean target registration error (TRE) was 0.7 mm (range: 0.1-1.5). The TRE of markers located at 5 cm from the imaging center was significantly higher than the TRE of markers located at 1 and 2 cm. However, the TRE was <1 mm in 90% of the overall trials and <1.5 mm in 100%. In the dry bone study, the mean TRE was 0.9 mm (range: 0.7-1.5) over the acetabulum and 1.0 mm (range: 0.5-1.4) over the femur. No significant difference in TRE was seen between the acetabulum and proximal femur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The accuracy of this novel 3D fluoroscopic navigation system was considered acceptable for clinical application. A 3D C-arm equipped with a flat-panel detector could increase the feasibility of 3D fluoroscopic navigation by reducing the effects of image distortion on navigation accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50644,"journal":{"name":"Computer Aided Surgery","volume":"16 5","pages":"234-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2011.602117","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Aided Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2011.602117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel 3-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopic navigation system using a flat-panel detector-equipped C-arm, focusing on the influence of the distance from the center of fluoroscopic imaging on navigation accuracy.

Materials and methods: A geometric phantom was made using a Styrofoam cube with 25 markers, each consisting of a metal ball 1.5 mm in diameter, fixed in a cross arrangement at 1-cm intervals. Hip joint surgery was simulated using a set of dry pelvic and femoral bones. A total of eight markers were fixed to the acetabulum and proximal femur.

Results: In the geometric phantom study, mean target registration error (TRE) was 0.7 mm (range: 0.1-1.5). The TRE of markers located at 5 cm from the imaging center was significantly higher than the TRE of markers located at 1 and 2 cm. However, the TRE was <1 mm in 90% of the overall trials and <1.5 mm in 100%. In the dry bone study, the mean TRE was 0.9 mm (range: 0.7-1.5) over the acetabulum and 1.0 mm (range: 0.5-1.4) over the femur. No significant difference in TRE was seen between the acetabulum and proximal femur.

Conclusion: The accuracy of this novel 3D fluoroscopic navigation system was considered acceptable for clinical application. A 3D C-arm equipped with a flat-panel detector could increase the feasibility of 3D fluoroscopic navigation by reducing the effects of image distortion on navigation accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维透视导航系统的精度使用平板探测器配备c臂。
目的:本研究的目的是评估一种新型的三维(3D)透视导航系统的精度,该系统使用配备平板探测器的c臂,重点研究透视成像中心距离对导航精度的影响。材料和方法:使用泡沫聚苯乙烯立方体制作几何幻影,其中有25个标记,每个标记由直径1.5 mm的金属球组成,以1厘米的间隔以交叉排列固定。使用一组干燥的骨盆和股骨模拟髋关节手术。髋臼和股骨近端共固定8个标记物。结果:在几何幻像研究中,平均目标配准误差(TRE)为0.7 mm(范围:0.1-1.5)。距离成像中心5cm处标记物的TRE显著高于距离成像中心1cm和2cm处标记物的TRE。结论:该新型三维透视导航系统的准确性可用于临床应用。配备平板探测器的三维c型臂可以减少图像畸变对导航精度的影响,从而提高三维透视导航的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Aided Surgery
Computer Aided Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.75
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Computer Aided Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotaxic procedures, surgery guided by ultrasound, image guided focal irradiation, robotic surgery, and other therapeutic interventions that are performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
期刊最新文献
One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection. Quantitative analysis of velopharyngeal movement using a stereoendoscope: accuracy and reliability of range images. Numerical simulation of blood flow and plaque progression in carotid-carotid bypass patient specific case. Towards the clinical integration of an image-guided navigation system for percutaneous liver tumor ablation using freehand 2D ultrasound images. A comparison of two surgical approaches in functional neurosurgery: individualized versus conventional stereotactic frames.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1