Neurotelemetry electrode application techniques compared.

Ryan R Lau, Mary K Powell, Colin Terry, Derek Jahnke
{"title":"Neurotelemetry electrode application techniques compared.","authors":"Ryan R Lau,&nbsp;Mary K Powell,&nbsp;Colin Terry,&nbsp;Derek Jahnke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The secure and efficient affixation of EEG electrodes is an integral part of performing neurotelemetry; however there are currently no recommendations for the ideal method of affixing the electrodes that has evidence-based support. The purpose of this study was to find and determine the best hook up method based on the required hook up time and number of repairs. One hundred neurotelemetry patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four electrode application methods: collodion-Ten20, collodion-Elefix, Hypafix-Ten20, or Hypafix-Elefix. The collodion-Ten20 method had the longest average hook up time (53.7 min) and the lowest percentage of patients who needed repairs (24%); the Hypafix-Ten20 method had the shortest average hook up time (42.1 min); and the Hypafix-Elefix had the highest percentage of patients who needed repairs (86.4%). Based on these results, the study led to the recommendations that collodion-Ten20 be used for neurotelemetry studies lasting 24 hours or more and that Hypafix is more suitable for routine EEG studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology","volume":"51 3","pages":"165-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Electroneurodiagnostic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The secure and efficient affixation of EEG electrodes is an integral part of performing neurotelemetry; however there are currently no recommendations for the ideal method of affixing the electrodes that has evidence-based support. The purpose of this study was to find and determine the best hook up method based on the required hook up time and number of repairs. One hundred neurotelemetry patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four electrode application methods: collodion-Ten20, collodion-Elefix, Hypafix-Ten20, or Hypafix-Elefix. The collodion-Ten20 method had the longest average hook up time (53.7 min) and the lowest percentage of patients who needed repairs (24%); the Hypafix-Ten20 method had the shortest average hook up time (42.1 min); and the Hypafix-Elefix had the highest percentage of patients who needed repairs (86.4%). Based on these results, the study led to the recommendations that collodion-Ten20 be used for neurotelemetry studies lasting 24 hours or more and that Hypafix is more suitable for routine EEG studies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经遥测电极应用技术比较。
安全高效的脑电电极连接是进行神经遥测的重要组成部分;然而,目前尚无证据支持的理想电极固定方法的建议。本研究的目的是根据所需的钩接时间和修复次数,找到并确定最佳的钩接方法。100名神经遥测患者被随机分配到以下四种电极应用方法之一:collodion-Ten20、collodion-Elefix、Hypafix-Ten20或Hypafix-Elefix。collodion-Ten20法平均连接时间最长(53.7 min),需要修复的患者比例最低(24%);Hypafix-Ten20法平均连接时间最短(42.1 min);而Hypafix-Elefix的患者需要修复的比例最高(86.4%)。基于这些结果,该研究建议将collodion-Ten20用于持续24小时或更长时间的神经遥测研究,而Hypafix更适合用于常规脑电图研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Water Management Projects in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Examining the Ethical Considerations Surrounding the Development and Use of AI Design and Implementation of a Secure Virtual Private Network Over an Open Network (Internet) Effects of ICT in Hotel Industry in South Africa Use of Mobile Phones in Nigeria to Prevent Crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1