Application of a CT-3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system to the pelvic and femoral regions.

Q Medicine Computer Aided Surgery Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.3109/10929088.2012.654823
Masaki Takao, Takashi Nishii, Takashi Sakai, Nobuhiko Sugano
{"title":"Application of a CT-3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system to the pelvic and femoral regions.","authors":"Masaki Takao,&nbsp;Takashi Nishii,&nbsp;Takashi Sakai,&nbsp;Nobuhiko Sugano","doi":"10.3109/10929088.2012.654823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to find the proper location of the fluoroscopic imaging center in order to apply a CT-based 3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system in the pelvic and femoral regions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To simulate surgeries around the hip joint, a dry human pelvis and femur were used. A total of 16 fiducial markers, each consisting of a metal ball 1.5 mm in diameter, were fixed to the pelvis and femur. For the pelvis, the pubic symphysis, the acetabular fossa, and a site on the ilium 3 cm above the acetabular roof were selected as fluoroscopic imaging centers. For the proximal femur, the base of the femoral neck, the femoral shaft at the level of the lesser trochanter, and the inferior border of the great trochanter were selected as fluoroscopic imaging centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Target registration error (TRE) differed significantly among the selected fluoroscopic imaging centers. The best mean TRE for the pelvis was 0.8 mm (range: 0.2 to 1.6 mm) with the imaging center on the ilium (3 cm above the acetabular roof). The best mean TRE for the proximal femur was 1.1 mm (range: 0.2 to 2.0 mm) with the imaging center on the femoral shaft at the lesser trochanter level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluoroscopic imaging center location had a significant effect on the accuracy of the CT-based 3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system in the pelvic and femoral regions. The proper fluoroscopic imaging centers for CT-3D fluoroscopic matching were, for the pelvis, a site on the ilium 3 cm above the acetabular roof, and for the proximal femur, the femoral shaft at the level of the lesser trochanter.</p>","PeriodicalId":50644,"journal":{"name":"Computer Aided Surgery","volume":"17 2","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2012.654823","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Aided Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2012.654823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to find the proper location of the fluoroscopic imaging center in order to apply a CT-based 3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system in the pelvic and femoral regions.

Materials and methods: To simulate surgeries around the hip joint, a dry human pelvis and femur were used. A total of 16 fiducial markers, each consisting of a metal ball 1.5 mm in diameter, were fixed to the pelvis and femur. For the pelvis, the pubic symphysis, the acetabular fossa, and a site on the ilium 3 cm above the acetabular roof were selected as fluoroscopic imaging centers. For the proximal femur, the base of the femoral neck, the femoral shaft at the level of the lesser trochanter, and the inferior border of the great trochanter were selected as fluoroscopic imaging centers.

Results: Target registration error (TRE) differed significantly among the selected fluoroscopic imaging centers. The best mean TRE for the pelvis was 0.8 mm (range: 0.2 to 1.6 mm) with the imaging center on the ilium (3 cm above the acetabular roof). The best mean TRE for the proximal femur was 1.1 mm (range: 0.2 to 2.0 mm) with the imaging center on the femoral shaft at the lesser trochanter level.

Conclusion: Fluoroscopic imaging center location had a significant effect on the accuracy of the CT-based 3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system in the pelvic and femoral regions. The proper fluoroscopic imaging centers for CT-3D fluoroscopic matching were, for the pelvis, a site on the ilium 3 cm above the acetabular roof, and for the proximal femur, the femoral shaft at the level of the lesser trochanter.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT-3D透视匹配导航系统在骨盆和股骨区域的应用。
目的:本研究的目的是寻找合适的透视成像中心位置,以便在骨盆和股骨区域应用基于ct的三维透视匹配导航系统。材料和方法:使用干燥的人体骨盆和股骨来模拟髋关节周围的手术。将16个基准标记固定于骨盆和股骨,每个基准标记由直径1.5 mm的金属球组成。对于骨盆,选择耻骨联合、髋臼窝和髋臼顶上方3cm的髂骨位置作为透视成像中心。对于股骨近端,选择股骨颈底部、股骨小粗隆水平和股骨大粗隆下缘作为透视成像中心。结果:不同的透视成像中心靶配准误差(Target registration error, TRE)差异显著。骨盆最佳平均TRE为0.8 mm(范围:0.2 ~ 1.6 mm),成像中心位于髂骨(髋臼顶上方3cm)。股骨近端最佳平均TRE为1.1 mm(范围:0.2 ~ 2.0 mm),成像中心位于股骨小粗隆水平。结论:透视成像中心位置对基于ct的骨盆和股骨区域三维透视匹配导航系统的准确性有显著影响。对于骨盆,CT-3D透视匹配的合适透视中心为髋臼顶上方3cm的髂骨位置,对于股骨近端,小转子水平的股骨干位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Aided Surgery
Computer Aided Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.75
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Computer Aided Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotaxic procedures, surgery guided by ultrasound, image guided focal irradiation, robotic surgery, and other therapeutic interventions that are performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
期刊最新文献
One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection. Quantitative analysis of velopharyngeal movement using a stereoendoscope: accuracy and reliability of range images. Numerical simulation of blood flow and plaque progression in carotid-carotid bypass patient specific case. Towards the clinical integration of an image-guided navigation system for percutaneous liver tumor ablation using freehand 2D ultrasound images. A comparison of two surgical approaches in functional neurosurgery: individualized versus conventional stereotactic frames.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1