Health Systems Performance Measurement Systems in Canada: How Well do They Perform in First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Contexts?

Pimatisiwin Pub Date : 2009-01-01
Marcia J Anderson, Janet K Smylie
{"title":"Health Systems Performance Measurement Systems in Canada: How Well do They Perform in First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Contexts?","authors":"Marcia J Anderson,&nbsp;Janet K Smylie","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To inventory and describe currently available health performance measurement systems for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people in Canada to identify why current measurement systems are inadequate to inform community or regional level health planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inventory, classification, and synthesis of strengths and weaknesses among existing health system performance measures through systematic literature review and key informant interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indigenous-specific health indicators are available at national, provincial, regional, and community levels, but there is a paucity of data for non-registered First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people. Barriers to the effective use of these indicators include: indicator selection driven by accountability rather than public health requirements; poor data quality; inadequate infrastructure and human resources; minimal information returned to communities; tension between agencies collecting universal indicators and Indigenous-determined processes; and, mistrust by Indigenous communities of externally imposed processes. The focus on national systems results in greater attention to disease-based measures and less focus on regional cultural diversity and Indigenous-specific values and priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indigenous health system performance measurement infrastructure in Canada is underdeveloped, particularly at the local level, and hence deficient in its ability to support community or regional health planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":88633,"journal":{"name":"Pimatisiwin","volume":"7 1","pages":"99-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582648/pdf/nihms2751.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pimatisiwin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To inventory and describe currently available health performance measurement systems for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people in Canada to identify why current measurement systems are inadequate to inform community or regional level health planning.

Methods: Inventory, classification, and synthesis of strengths and weaknesses among existing health system performance measures through systematic literature review and key informant interviews.

Results: Indigenous-specific health indicators are available at national, provincial, regional, and community levels, but there is a paucity of data for non-registered First Nations, Métis, and Inuit people. Barriers to the effective use of these indicators include: indicator selection driven by accountability rather than public health requirements; poor data quality; inadequate infrastructure and human resources; minimal information returned to communities; tension between agencies collecting universal indicators and Indigenous-determined processes; and, mistrust by Indigenous communities of externally imposed processes. The focus on national systems results in greater attention to disease-based measures and less focus on regional cultural diversity and Indigenous-specific values and priorities.

Conclusion: Indigenous health system performance measurement infrastructure in Canada is underdeveloped, particularly at the local level, and hence deficient in its ability to support community or regional health planning.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大卫生系统绩效评估系统:在第一民族、因纽特人和马姆萨迪人环境下的表现如何?
目的:盘点和描述加拿大原住民、因纽特人和马姆萨迪人目前可用的卫生绩效测量系统,以确定为什么目前的测量系统不足以为社区或地区一级的卫生规划提供信息。方法:通过系统文献综述和关键信息提供者访谈,对现有卫生系统绩效指标的优势和劣势进行盘点、分类和综合。结果:在国家、省、地区和社区各级都有土著特有的健康指标,但缺乏关于未登记的第一民族、马姆萨迪人和因纽特人的数据。有效使用这些指标的障碍包括:由问责制而非公共卫生要求驱动的指标选择;数据质量差;基础设施和人力资源不足;向社区返回的信息最少;收集普遍指标的机构与土著决定的进程之间的紧张关系;土著社区不信任外部强加的程序。对国家系统的关注导致更多地关注基于疾病的措施,而较少关注区域文化多样性和土著特有的价值观和优先事项。结论:加拿大土著卫生系统绩效衡量基础设施不发达,特别是在地方一级,因此缺乏支持社区或区域卫生规划的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-university Research Liaisons: Translating the Languages of Research and Culture. Navigating the Tide Together: Early Collaboration between Tribal and Academic Partners in a CBPR Study. Indigenous Women of Latin America: Unintended Pregnancy, Unsafe Abortion, and Reproductive Health Outcomes. Health Is Life in Balance: Students and Communities Explore Healthy Lifestyles in a Culturally Based Curriculum. Life Story Board: A Tool in the Prevention of Domestic Violence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1