Intra-operative reliability of ShapeMatch cutting guide placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Q Medicine Computer Aided Surgery Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-03-06 DOI:10.3109/10929088.2013.774049
Gavin Clark, Anthony Leong, Peter McEwen, Robert Steele, Ton Tran, Adrian Trivett
{"title":"Intra-operative reliability of ShapeMatch cutting guide placement in total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Gavin Clark,&nbsp;Anthony Leong,&nbsp;Peter McEwen,&nbsp;Robert Steele,&nbsp;Ton Tran,&nbsp;Adrian Trivett","doi":"10.3109/10929088.2013.774049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Custom cutting guides based on pre-operative imaging have been introduced for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the reliability of repeated placement of custom cutting guides by multiple surgeons in a group of patients undergoing TKA. Custom cutting guides (ShapeMatch®, Stryker Orthopaedics) were designed from pre-operative MRI scans. The treating surgeon placed each guide on the femur and tibia of each patient three times without pinning the block. The three-dimensional position and orientation of the guide was measured for each repetition using a computer navigation system. The surgeon was blinded to the navigation system display. Data from 24 patients and 6 surgeons were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all measurement parameters were in the range 0.889-0.997 (excellent), and all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The range for femoral varus/valgus was 0.0-1.5°, with 96% of patients being within 0.5°. For femoral flexion/extension the range was 0.0-3.5° (92% within 2.5°). On the tibia, varus/valgus had a range of 0.0-1.0° (92% within 0.5°), and for slope the range was 0.0-3.5° (92% within 2.5°). The high degree of agreement indicated that intra-surgeon variation was minimal and that the technique is reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50644,"journal":{"name":"Computer Aided Surgery","volume":"18 5-6","pages":"159-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2013.774049","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Aided Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2013.774049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Custom cutting guides based on pre-operative imaging have been introduced for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the reliability of repeated placement of custom cutting guides by multiple surgeons in a group of patients undergoing TKA. Custom cutting guides (ShapeMatch®, Stryker Orthopaedics) were designed from pre-operative MRI scans. The treating surgeon placed each guide on the femur and tibia of each patient three times without pinning the block. The three-dimensional position and orientation of the guide was measured for each repetition using a computer navigation system. The surgeon was blinded to the navigation system display. Data from 24 patients and 6 surgeons were analyzed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for all measurement parameters were in the range 0.889-0.997 (excellent), and all comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The range for femoral varus/valgus was 0.0-1.5°, with 96% of patients being within 0.5°. For femoral flexion/extension the range was 0.0-3.5° (92% within 2.5°). On the tibia, varus/valgus had a range of 0.0-1.0° (92% within 0.5°), and for slope the range was 0.0-3.5° (92% within 2.5°). The high degree of agreement indicated that intra-surgeon variation was minimal and that the technique is reliable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术中ShapeMatch切割导片置入的可靠性。
全膝关节置换术(TKA)中引入了基于术前成像的定制切割指南。本前瞻性队列研究的目的是评估多名外科医生在一组接受TKA的患者中重复放置定制切割导片的可靠性。定制切割指南(ShapeMatch®,Stryker orthopatics)是根据术前MRI扫描设计的。治疗外科医生在每位患者的股骨和胫骨上放置每个导板三次,不固定导板。每次使用计算机导航系统测量导轨的三维位置和方向。外科医生看不见导航系统的显示。分析了24名患者和6名外科医生的资料。各测量参数的类内相关系数在0.889 ~ 0.997之间(优),比较均有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。股骨内翻/外翻范围为0.0-1.5°,96%的患者在0.5°以内。股骨屈伸范围为0.0-3.5°(92%在2.5°内)。胫骨内翻/外翻范围为0.0-1.0°(92%在0.5°内),斜坡范围为0.0-3.5°(92%在2.5°内)。高度的一致性表明外科医生之间的差异很小,该技术是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Aided Surgery
Computer Aided Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.75
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Computer Aided Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotaxic procedures, surgery guided by ultrasound, image guided focal irradiation, robotic surgery, and other therapeutic interventions that are performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
期刊最新文献
One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection. Quantitative analysis of velopharyngeal movement using a stereoendoscope: accuracy and reliability of range images. Numerical simulation of blood flow and plaque progression in carotid-carotid bypass patient specific case. Towards the clinical integration of an image-guided navigation system for percutaneous liver tumor ablation using freehand 2D ultrasound images. A comparison of two surgical approaches in functional neurosurgery: individualized versus conventional stereotactic frames.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1