The Efficiency of Zero-profile Implant in Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Long-term Follow-up Study.

Yibing Li, Dingjun Hao, Baorong He, Xiaodong Wang, Liang Yan
{"title":"The Efficiency of Zero-profile Implant in Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Long-term Follow-up Study.","authors":"Yibing Li,&nbsp;Dingjun Hao,&nbsp;Baorong He,&nbsp;Xiaodong Wang,&nbsp;Liang Yan","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective controlled study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the zero-profile device with that of an anterior cervical plate and cage in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>A series of studies have indicated that anterior instruments produce good clinical results during ACDF. However, common implants are associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. A cervical stand-alone cage with integrated fixation for zero-profile segmental stabilization has been developed to solve this problem.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 46 patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy were randomly treated with an anterior plate and a cage or a new zero-profile implant between September 2009 and April 2010. Patients were followed for 2 years. The operation time, blood loss, exposure to radiation, the Japan Department of Orthopedics Association (JOA) score, pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and dysphagia score were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation was completed successfully in 46 patients. Twenty-three patients received an anterior plate and cage (control group) and 23 patients received the new zero-profile implant (test group). Analysis of postoperative data at all protocol-defined intervals demonstrated improvement in all clinical outcomes for both the groups when compared with the corresponding preoperative data. No significant difference in VAS and JOA score was found in the 2 treatment groups. The test group had a greater reduction in dysphagia at all follow-up intervals, compared with the control group. No adjacent segment degeneration was found in the test group, whereas 4 patients in the control group developed degeneration in adjacent segments (P=0.045). Both the groups had no adverse events associated with the implant or implant surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Zero-P implant is a viable alternative to ACDF in patients with persistently symptomatic, single-level cervical disk disease. The procedure requires more technical requirements than traditional plates.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 10","pages":"398-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000032","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Study design: A prospective controlled study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the zero-profile device with that of an anterior cervical plate and cage in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Summary of background data: A series of studies have indicated that anterior instruments produce good clinical results during ACDF. However, common implants are associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. A cervical stand-alone cage with integrated fixation for zero-profile segmental stabilization has been developed to solve this problem.

Materials and methods: A total of 46 patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy were randomly treated with an anterior plate and a cage or a new zero-profile implant between September 2009 and April 2010. Patients were followed for 2 years. The operation time, blood loss, exposure to radiation, the Japan Department of Orthopedics Association (JOA) score, pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and dysphagia score were recorded.

Results: The operation was completed successfully in 46 patients. Twenty-three patients received an anterior plate and cage (control group) and 23 patients received the new zero-profile implant (test group). Analysis of postoperative data at all protocol-defined intervals demonstrated improvement in all clinical outcomes for both the groups when compared with the corresponding preoperative data. No significant difference in VAS and JOA score was found in the 2 treatment groups. The test group had a greater reduction in dysphagia at all follow-up intervals, compared with the control group. No adjacent segment degeneration was found in the test group, whereas 4 patients in the control group developed degeneration in adjacent segments (P=0.045). Both the groups had no adverse events associated with the implant or implant surgery.

Conclusions: The Zero-P implant is a viable alternative to ACDF in patients with persistently symptomatic, single-level cervical disk disease. The procedure requires more technical requirements than traditional plates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零侧位种植体在前路椎间盘切除术融合中的有效性:一项前瞻性对照长期随访研究。
研究设计:前瞻性对照研究。目的:本研究的目的是比较零轮廓装置与前路颈椎板和颈椎笼在前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)患者中的安全性和有效性。背景资料总结:一系列研究表明,前路器械在ACDF中具有良好的临床效果。然而,普通种植体的术后并发症发生率较高。为了解决这一问题,我们开发了一种具有集成固定的颈椎独立笼,用于零侧位节段稳定。材料和方法:2009年9月至2010年4月,我们随机选取46例颈椎神经根病或脊髓型颈椎病患者,采用前钢板+ cage或新型零侧位种植体进行治疗。随访2年。记录手术时间、出血量、辐射暴露、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、吞咽困难评分。结果:46例患者手术顺利完成。23例患者接受前钢板和前笼(对照组),23例患者接受新型零侧位种植体(试验组)。在所有方案定义的时间间隔内对术后数据的分析表明,与相应的术前数据相比,两组的所有临床结果都有所改善。两组患者VAS评分、JOA评分差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,试验组在所有随访期间都有更大的吞咽困难减少。实验组未见邻近节段退变,对照组4例相邻节段退变(P=0.045)。两组均未发生与种植体或种植体手术相关的不良事件。结论:对于症状持续的单节段颈椎间盘病变患者,Zero-P种植体是替代ACDF的可行方法。与传统制版相比,这一过程需要更多的技术要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
期刊最新文献
Crystal structure of an inorganic pyrophosphatase from Chlamydia trachomatis D/UW-3/Cx. Effect of Preoperative Tracheal Stretch Exercise on Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Management and Outcomes of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Associated With Anterior Decompression for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament With or Without Dural Ossification. The Efficiency of Zero-profile Implant in Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Long-term Follow-up Study. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1