[The "secret book" of Dr Friedrich Benjamin Osiander: anonymous births in the Göttingen Accouchierhaus, 1794-1819].

Jürgen Schlumbohm
{"title":"[The \"secret book\" of Dr Friedrich Benjamin Osiander: anonymous births in the Göttingen Accouchierhaus, 1794-1819].","authors":"Jürgen Schlumbohm","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The problem of anonymous or confidential deliveries, a subject of current controversy, has a long history. Some maternity hospitals offered the possibility for \"clandestine\" births as early as the 18th and 19th century. A recently emerged source about the maternity clinic of Göttingen University allows insight into the motives that led to keeping a birth secret and the consequences of such a clandestine birth for mother, father and child. The director of the institution, a professor of obstetrics, wrote case reports on the women, who paid a handsome sum for his help and the in-patient care they received. In return, these women could be admitted under a pseudonym, and thus falsify their child's birth certificate; moreover they were not used as teaching material for medical students and midwife apprentices, whereas \"regular\" patients had to give their names and, in return for being treated free of charge, be available for teaching purposes. The ten cases that have been painstakingly investigated reveal that the reasons that led the women and men to opt for an anonymous birth were manifold, that they used this offer in different ways and with different consequences. All of these pregnancies were illegitimate, of course. In one case the expectant mother was married. In several cases it would be the father who was married. Most of the women who gave birth secretly seem to have given the professor their actual details and he kept quiet about them--with the exception of one case where he revealed the contents of the case report many years later in an alimony suit. Only one of the men admitted paternity openly, but many revealed their identity implicitly by registering the pregnant woman or by accompanying her to the clinic. If the birth was to be kept secret the child needed to be handed over to foster parents. By paying a lump sum that covered the usual fourteen years of parenting, one mother was able to avoid any later contact with her son. In most cases contact seems to have been limited to the payment of this boarding money. One of the couples married later and took in the twins that had been born clandestinely out of wedlock. One mother kept close contact with her son through intermediaries. All of the women who gave birth in this clandestine fashion received practical as well as financial support, often from the child's father or from a relative. Few of them came by themselves. In those days, only women who used the maternity hospital free of charge would have been as isolated in the difficult perinatal period as are women today who choose to deliver their babies anonymously.</p>","PeriodicalId":81975,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"32 ","pages":"137-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of anonymous or confidential deliveries, a subject of current controversy, has a long history. Some maternity hospitals offered the possibility for "clandestine" births as early as the 18th and 19th century. A recently emerged source about the maternity clinic of Göttingen University allows insight into the motives that led to keeping a birth secret and the consequences of such a clandestine birth for mother, father and child. The director of the institution, a professor of obstetrics, wrote case reports on the women, who paid a handsome sum for his help and the in-patient care they received. In return, these women could be admitted under a pseudonym, and thus falsify their child's birth certificate; moreover they were not used as teaching material for medical students and midwife apprentices, whereas "regular" patients had to give their names and, in return for being treated free of charge, be available for teaching purposes. The ten cases that have been painstakingly investigated reveal that the reasons that led the women and men to opt for an anonymous birth were manifold, that they used this offer in different ways and with different consequences. All of these pregnancies were illegitimate, of course. In one case the expectant mother was married. In several cases it would be the father who was married. Most of the women who gave birth secretly seem to have given the professor their actual details and he kept quiet about them--with the exception of one case where he revealed the contents of the case report many years later in an alimony suit. Only one of the men admitted paternity openly, but many revealed their identity implicitly by registering the pregnant woman or by accompanying her to the clinic. If the birth was to be kept secret the child needed to be handed over to foster parents. By paying a lump sum that covered the usual fourteen years of parenting, one mother was able to avoid any later contact with her son. In most cases contact seems to have been limited to the payment of this boarding money. One of the couples married later and took in the twins that had been born clandestinely out of wedlock. One mother kept close contact with her son through intermediaries. All of the women who gave birth in this clandestine fashion received practical as well as financial support, often from the child's father or from a relative. Few of them came by themselves. In those days, only women who used the maternity hospital free of charge would have been as isolated in the difficult perinatal period as are women today who choose to deliver their babies anonymously.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Friedrich Benjamin Osiander博士的“秘密书”:Göttingen Accouchierhaus的匿名出生,1794-1819]。
匿名或保密递送的问题,是当前争议的一个主题,有着悠久的历史。早在18世纪和19世纪,一些妇产医院就提供了"秘密"分娩的可能性。最近关于Göttingen大学产科诊所的消息让我们了解了秘密分娩的动机,以及这种秘密分娩对母亲、父亲和孩子的影响。该机构的负责人是一位产科教授,他为这些妇女撰写病例报告,这些妇女为他的帮助和住院治疗支付了一笔可观的费用。作为回报,这些妇女可以用假名入境,从而伪造孩子的出生证明;此外,它们不被用作医学院学生和助产士学徒的教学材料,而"普通"病人必须提供姓名,作为免费治疗的回报,他们可以用于教学目的。经过精心调查的十个案例表明,导致女性和男性选择匿名分娩的原因是多方面的,他们以不同的方式使用这种方式,并产生不同的后果。当然,所有这些怀孕都是非法的。在一个案例中,准妈妈已经结婚了。在一些情况下,是已婚的父亲。大多数秘密分娩的妇女似乎都向教授透露了她们的实际细节,而教授却对她们保持沉默——只有一个例外,多年后他在一起赡养费诉讼中透露了病例报告的内容。只有一名男子公开承认了自己的父亲身份,但许多人都通过给孕妇登记或陪同她去诊所来暗示自己的身份。如果要对孩子的出生保密,孩子就必须交给养父母。通过一次性支付通常14年的养育费用,一位母亲能够避免以后与她的儿子接触。在大多数情况下,联系似乎仅限于支付这笔住宿费。其中一对夫妇后来结婚,收养了一对秘密出生的非婚生双胞胎。一位母亲通过中间人与儿子保持密切联系。所有以这种秘密方式分娩的妇女都得到了实际和经济上的支持,通常来自孩子的父亲或亲戚。他们中很少有人是自己来的。在那些日子里,只有免费去妇产医院的妇女才会像今天选择匿名分娩的妇女那样,在困难的围产期受到隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Poverty and Sickness. The precarious lives of lower-class families in Würzburg and Göttingen, 1800-1850]. [The Hygienist Karl Roelcke, M.D. (1907-1982). Annotations to the family biography]. [Gender images in health education: a comparison between East and West Germany (1949-1990)]. [Protestant clergymen among Hahnemann's clientele. Patient histories in letters]. [The company Willmar Schwabe in the Nazi era].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1