Christoph Friedrich, Ulrich Meyer, Caroline Seyfang
{"title":"[The company Willmar Schwabe in the Nazi era].","authors":"Christoph Friedrich, Ulrich Meyer, Caroline Seyfang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay follows the history of the Schwabe Company between 1933 and 1945 when it, like all other companies at the time, had to subject to the state-enforced conformity ('Gleichschaltung'). While Willmar Schwabe II (1878-1935), the company's second director, kept clear of Nazi politics, both of his sons, who succeeded him at an early age, became members of the Nazi party: Willmar III (1907-1983) probably from initial conviction and Wolfgang (1912-2000), who joined in 1937, more likely for opportunistic reasons. The two lay journals published by Schwabe--the Leipziger Populäre Zeitschrift für Homöopathie and the Biochemische Monatsblätter--embraced the Nazi ideology more thoroughly than the general homeopathic journal Allgemeine Homöopathische Zeitung, including above all contributions on racial hygiene. Our research has revealed that Schwabe only employed foreign workers from 1942 on, that their number was much lower, at 0.9 per cent in 1942 and 3.6 per cent in 1944, than that of other pharmaceutical companies and that their pay hardly differed from that of German workers. The sales and profit figures investigated have shown that the company did not profit exceptionally from the new Nazi health policies ('Neue Deutsche Heilkunde'): while its sales and profits rose in the Nazi era due to the increased use of medication among the civil population during wartime, the drugs produced by Schwabe remained marginal also during the war, as is apparent also from its modest deliveries to the army. All in all one can conclude that the company offered neither resistance nor particular support to the Nazi ideology.</p>","PeriodicalId":81975,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"34 ","pages":"209-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay follows the history of the Schwabe Company between 1933 and 1945 when it, like all other companies at the time, had to subject to the state-enforced conformity ('Gleichschaltung'). While Willmar Schwabe II (1878-1935), the company's second director, kept clear of Nazi politics, both of his sons, who succeeded him at an early age, became members of the Nazi party: Willmar III (1907-1983) probably from initial conviction and Wolfgang (1912-2000), who joined in 1937, more likely for opportunistic reasons. The two lay journals published by Schwabe--the Leipziger Populäre Zeitschrift für Homöopathie and the Biochemische Monatsblätter--embraced the Nazi ideology more thoroughly than the general homeopathic journal Allgemeine Homöopathische Zeitung, including above all contributions on racial hygiene. Our research has revealed that Schwabe only employed foreign workers from 1942 on, that their number was much lower, at 0.9 per cent in 1942 and 3.6 per cent in 1944, than that of other pharmaceutical companies and that their pay hardly differed from that of German workers. The sales and profit figures investigated have shown that the company did not profit exceptionally from the new Nazi health policies ('Neue Deutsche Heilkunde'): while its sales and profits rose in the Nazi era due to the increased use of medication among the civil population during wartime, the drugs produced by Schwabe remained marginal also during the war, as is apparent also from its modest deliveries to the army. All in all one can conclude that the company offered neither resistance nor particular support to the Nazi ideology.
本文追溯了施瓦贝公司在1933年至1945年间的历史,与当时所有其他公司一样,它不得不服从国家强制的一致性(Gleichschaltung)。虽然公司的第二任董事威尔玛•施瓦贝二世(1878-1935)远离纳粹政治,但他的两个儿子——他们很早就继承了他的职位——都成为了纳粹党成员:威尔玛三世(1907-1983)可能是由于最初的定罪,而沃尔夫冈(1912-2000)于1937年加入纳粹党,更可能是出于机会主义的原因。施瓦贝出版的两本非专业期刊——《莱比锡Populäre Zeitschrift f Homöopathie》和《生物化学》Monatsblätter——比一般的顺势疗法期刊《Allgemeine Homöopathische Zeitung》更彻底地接受了纳粹的意识形态,尤其是在种族卫生方面的贡献。我们的研究显示,施瓦贝从1942年起只雇用外国工人,其比例远低于其他制药公司,1942年为0.9%,1944年为3.6%,而且他们的工资与德国工人几乎没有差别。所调查的销售和利润数字表明,该公司并没有从纳粹的新卫生政策(" Neue Deutsche Heilkunde ")中获得特别的利润:虽然在纳粹时期,由于战时平民使用药物的增加,该公司的销售和利润有所增加,但在战争期间,Schwabe生产的药物也很少,这一点从它向军队提供的少量药物中也可以看出。总而言之,人们可以得出结论,该公司既没有对纳粹意识形态进行抵抗,也没有特别支持。