Socioeconomic determinants of prescribed and non-prescribed medicine consumption in Austria.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2015-08-01 Epub Date: 2014-11-12 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/cku179
Susanne Mayer, August Österle
{"title":"Socioeconomic determinants of prescribed and non-prescribed medicine consumption in Austria.","authors":"Susanne Mayer,&nbsp;August Österle","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/cku179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equitable access to health care is a goal subscribed to in many European economies. But while a growing body of literature studies socioeconomic inequalities in health service use, relatively little is still known about inequalities in medicine consumption. Against this background, this study investigates the (socioeconomic) determinants of medicine use in the Austrian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multivariate logistic regressions were estimated based on the European Health Interview Survey, including representative information of the Austrian population above age 25 (n = 13 291) for 2006/2007. As dependent variables, we used prescribed and non-prescribed medicine consumption as well as prescribed polypharmacy. Socioeconomic status was operationalized by employment status, education and net equivalent income. Health indicators (self-assessed health, chronic conditions), demographic characteristics (age, sex) and outpatient visits were included as control variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Socioeconomic status revealed opposing utilization patterns: while individuals with higher education and income were more likely to consume non-prescribed medicines, the less educated were more likely to take prescribed medicines. Lower socioeconomic groups also showed a higher likelihood for prescribed polypharmacy. For the consumption of both medicine types, the main socioeconomic determinant was high income. In an additional analysis, lower socioeconomic groups were found to more likely report prescription purposes as the main reason for consulting a practitioner.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results point to different behavioural responses to ill health, not least determined by institutional incentives in the Austrian health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":"25 4","pages":"597-603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/eurpub/cku179","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Background: Equitable access to health care is a goal subscribed to in many European economies. But while a growing body of literature studies socioeconomic inequalities in health service use, relatively little is still known about inequalities in medicine consumption. Against this background, this study investigates the (socioeconomic) determinants of medicine use in the Austrian context.

Methods: Multivariate logistic regressions were estimated based on the European Health Interview Survey, including representative information of the Austrian population above age 25 (n = 13 291) for 2006/2007. As dependent variables, we used prescribed and non-prescribed medicine consumption as well as prescribed polypharmacy. Socioeconomic status was operationalized by employment status, education and net equivalent income. Health indicators (self-assessed health, chronic conditions), demographic characteristics (age, sex) and outpatient visits were included as control variables.

Results: Socioeconomic status revealed opposing utilization patterns: while individuals with higher education and income were more likely to consume non-prescribed medicines, the less educated were more likely to take prescribed medicines. Lower socioeconomic groups also showed a higher likelihood for prescribed polypharmacy. For the consumption of both medicine types, the main socioeconomic determinant was high income. In an additional analysis, lower socioeconomic groups were found to more likely report prescription purposes as the main reason for consulting a practitioner.

Conclusion: These results point to different behavioural responses to ill health, not least determined by institutional incentives in the Austrian health care system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥地利处方药和非处方药消费的社会经济决定因素。
背景:公平获得医疗保健是许多欧洲经济体所赞同的目标。但是,尽管越来越多的文献研究卫生服务使用中的社会经济不平等,但对药品消费中的不平等仍然知之甚少。在此背景下,本研究调查(社会经济)决定因素的药物使用在奥地利的背景下。方法:根据欧洲健康访谈调查,包括2006/2007年奥地利25岁以上人口的代表性信息(n = 13291),进行多变量logistic回归估计。作为因变量,我们使用处方和非处方药物消费以及处方综合用药。社会经济地位通过就业状况、教育和净等效收入来运作。健康指标(自我评估的健康状况、慢性病)、人口统计学特征(年龄、性别)和门诊就诊作为控制变量。结果:社会经济地位揭示了相反的使用模式:高学历和高收入的个体更倾向于消费非处方药,而低学历的个体更倾向于服用处方药。社会经济地位较低的群体也更有可能使用复方处方药。对于两种药物的消费,主要的社会经济决定因素是高收入。在另一项分析中,社会经济地位较低的群体更有可能报告处方目的是咨询医生的主要原因。结论:这些结果指向不同的行为反应的健康状况不佳,尤其是由制度激励决定在奥地利卫生保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
The effect of the 'Every Mind Matters' campaign on mental health literacy: the moderating roles of socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Why the European Journal of Public Health and EUPHA are opposing President Trump's attack on the language of diversity. Social inequalities in the effects of school-based well-being interventions: a systematic review. A new era of inequality: profound changes to mortality in England, Scotland, and 10 major British cities. Effects of changes to income tax and devolved benefits in Scotland on health inequalities: a modelling study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1