Psychiatric assessment and screening for the elderly in primary care: design, implementation, and preliminary results.

Robert C Abrams, Blanca Boné, M Cary Reid, Ronald D Adelman, Risa Breckman, Ronald Goralewicz, Marlena Palombo, Amy Stern, Rouzi Shengelia, Jeanne Teresi
{"title":"Psychiatric assessment and screening for the elderly in primary care: design, implementation, and preliminary results.","authors":"Robert C Abrams,&nbsp;Blanca Boné,&nbsp;M Cary Reid,&nbsp;Ronald D Adelman,&nbsp;Risa Breckman,&nbsp;Ronald Goralewicz,&nbsp;Marlena Palombo,&nbsp;Amy Stern,&nbsp;Rouzi Shengelia,&nbsp;Jeanne Teresi","doi":"10.1155/2015/792043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We describe the design and implementation of a psychiatric collaborative care model in a University-based geriatric primary care practice. Initial results of screening for anxiety and depression are reported.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Screens for anxiety and depression were administered to practice patients. A mental health team, consisting of a psychiatrist, mental health nurse practitioner and social worker, identified patients who on review of screening and chart data warranted evaluation or treatment. Referrals for mental health interventions were directed to members of the mental health team, primary care physicians at the practice, or community providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects (N=1505) comprised 38.2% of the 3940 unique patients seen at the practice during the 4-year study period. 37.1% (N=555) screened positive for depression, 26.9 % (N=405) for anxiety, and 322 (21.4%) screened positive for both. Any positive score was associated with age (p<0.033), female gender (p<0.006), and a non-significant trend toward living alone (p<0.095). 8.87% had suicidal thoughts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening captured the most affectively symptomatic patients, including those with suicidal ideation, for intervention. The partnering of mental health professionals and primary care physicians offers a workable model for addressing the scarcity of expertise in geriatric psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":90899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatrics","volume":"2015 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/792043","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/792043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: We describe the design and implementation of a psychiatric collaborative care model in a University-based geriatric primary care practice. Initial results of screening for anxiety and depression are reported.

Methods and materials: Screens for anxiety and depression were administered to practice patients. A mental health team, consisting of a psychiatrist, mental health nurse practitioner and social worker, identified patients who on review of screening and chart data warranted evaluation or treatment. Referrals for mental health interventions were directed to members of the mental health team, primary care physicians at the practice, or community providers.

Results: Subjects (N=1505) comprised 38.2% of the 3940 unique patients seen at the practice during the 4-year study period. 37.1% (N=555) screened positive for depression, 26.9 % (N=405) for anxiety, and 322 (21.4%) screened positive for both. Any positive score was associated with age (p<0.033), female gender (p<0.006), and a non-significant trend toward living alone (p<0.095). 8.87% had suicidal thoughts.

Conclusions: Screening captured the most affectively symptomatic patients, including those with suicidal ideation, for intervention. The partnering of mental health professionals and primary care physicians offers a workable model for addressing the scarcity of expertise in geriatric psychiatry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中老年人的精神病学评估和筛查:设计、实施和初步结果。
简介:我们描述的设计和实施精神病学合作护理模式在大学为基础的老年初级保健实践。报告了焦虑和抑郁筛查的初步结果。方法和材料:对实习患者进行焦虑和抑郁筛查。一个由精神科医生、精神卫生执业护士和社会工作者组成的精神卫生小组,通过审查筛查和图表数据,确定了需要评估或治疗的患者。心理健康干预的转介直接指向心理健康团队的成员、诊所的初级保健医生或社区提供者。结果:在4年的研究期间,受试者(N=1505)占3940例独特患者的38.2%。37.1% (N=555)抑郁筛查呈阳性,26.9% (N=405)焦虑筛查呈阳性,322(21.4%)两种筛查均呈阳性。任何阳性评分都与年龄相关(结论:筛查捕获了最有效的症状患者,包括那些有自杀念头的患者,进行干预。精神卫生专业人员和初级保健医生的合作为解决老年精神病学专业知识匮乏的问题提供了一个可行的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-Based Supports and Services for Older Adults: A Primer for Clinicians. Psychiatric assessment and screening for the elderly in primary care: design, implementation, and preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1