The Star Rating System and Medicare Advantage Plans.

Lisa Sprague
{"title":"The Star Rating System and Medicare Advantage Plans.","authors":"Lisa Sprague","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With nearly 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries opting to enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans instead of fee-for-service Medicare, it's safe to say the MA program is quite popular. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administers a Star Ratings program for MA plans, which offers measures of quality and service among the plans that are used not only to help beneficiaries choose plans but also to award additional payments to plans that meet high standards. These additional payments, in turn, are used by plans to provide additional benefits to beneficiaries or to reduce cost sharing--added features that are likely to factor into beneficiaries' choice of MA plans. The Star Ratings program is also meant to drive improvements in the quality of plans, and this secondary effort seems to have been successful. Despite this success, issues with the Star Ratings system remain, including: how performance metrics are developed, chosen, and maintained; how differences among beneficiary populations (particularly with regard to the dually eligible and those receiving low-income subsidies) should be recognized; and the extent to which health plans can control the variables on which they are being measured. Because the Star Ratings approach has been extended to providers of health care as well--hospitals, nursing homes, and dialysis facilities--these issues are worth exploring as CMS fine-tunes its methods of measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":87188,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","volume":" 854","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With nearly 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries opting to enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans instead of fee-for-service Medicare, it's safe to say the MA program is quite popular. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administers a Star Ratings program for MA plans, which offers measures of quality and service among the plans that are used not only to help beneficiaries choose plans but also to award additional payments to plans that meet high standards. These additional payments, in turn, are used by plans to provide additional benefits to beneficiaries or to reduce cost sharing--added features that are likely to factor into beneficiaries' choice of MA plans. The Star Ratings program is also meant to drive improvements in the quality of plans, and this secondary effort seems to have been successful. Despite this success, issues with the Star Ratings system remain, including: how performance metrics are developed, chosen, and maintained; how differences among beneficiary populations (particularly with regard to the dually eligible and those receiving low-income subsidies) should be recognized; and the extent to which health plans can control the variables on which they are being measured. Because the Star Ratings approach has been extended to providers of health care as well--hospitals, nursing homes, and dialysis facilities--these issues are worth exploring as CMS fine-tunes its methods of measurement.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
星级评级系统和医疗保险优势计划。
近30%的医疗保险受益人选择参加医疗保险优势(MA)计划,而不是按服务收费的医疗保险,可以肯定地说,MA计划相当受欢迎。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)管理着MA计划的星级评定计划,该计划提供了计划质量和服务的衡量标准,不仅用于帮助受益人选择计划,而且还用于奖励符合高标准的计划的额外支付。这些额外的支付,反过来,被计划用来为受益人提供额外的福利或减少成本分摊——这些附加的特征可能会影响受益人对MA计划的选择。星级评级计划还旨在推动计划质量的提高,这一次要努力似乎取得了成功。尽管取得了这样的成功,星级评级系统仍然存在一些问题,包括:如何开发、选择和维护绩效指标;如何认识到受益人口(特别是有双重资格的人和接受低收入补贴的人)之间的差异;以及健康计划在多大程度上可以控制衡量它们的变量。由于星级评定方法已经扩展到医疗保健提供者——医院、养老院和透析设施——这些问题值得CMS对其测量方法进行微调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Star Rating System and Medicare Advantage Plans. Telehealth: into the mainstream? Seeking value in Medicare: performance measurement for clinical professionals. Health workforce needs: projections complicated by practice and technology changes. Medicare Advantage update: benefits, enrollment, and payments after the ACA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1