An exploratory study of drivers’ EEG response during emergent collision avoidance

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.015
Xiaomeng Li , Liu Yang , Xuedong Yan
{"title":"An exploratory study of drivers’ EEG response during emergent collision avoidance","authors":"Xiaomeng Li ,&nbsp;Liu Yang ,&nbsp;Xuedong Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2022.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> EEG (electroencephalogram) has been applied as a valuable measure to estimate drivers’ mental status and cognitive workload during driving tasks. However, most previous studies have focused on the EEG features at particular driver status, such as fatigue or distraction, with less attention paid to EEG response in emergent and safety–critical situations. This study aims to investigate the underlying patterns of different EEG components during an emergent collision avoidance process. <em>Method:</em> A driving simulator experiment was conducted with 38 participants (19 females and 19 males). The scenario included a roadside pedestrian who suddenly crossed the road when the driver approached. The participants’ EEG data were collected during the pedestrian-collision avoidance process. The log-transformed power and power ratio of four typical EEG components (i.e., delta, theta, alpha and beta) were extracted from four collision avoidance stages: Stage 1-normal driving stage, Stage 2-hazard perception stage, Stage 3-evasive action stage, and Stage 4-post-hazard stage. <em>Results:</em> The activities of all four EEG bands changed consistently during the collision avoidance process, with the power increased significantly from Stage 1 to Stage 4. Drivers who collided with the pedestrian and drivers who avoided the collision successfully did not show a significant difference in EEG activity across the stages. Male drivers had a higher delta power ratio and lower alpha power ratio than females in both hazard perception and evasive action stages. <em>Conclusions:</em> Enhanced activities of different EEG bands could be concurrent at emergent and safety–critical situations. Female drivers were more mentally aroused than male drivers during the collision avoidance process. <em>Practical Applications:</em> The study generates more understanding of drivers’ neurophysiological response in an emergent and safety–critical collision avoidance event. Driver state monitoring and warning systems that aim to assist drivers in impending collisions may utilize the patterns of EEG activity identified in the collision avoidance process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437522000767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: EEG (electroencephalogram) has been applied as a valuable measure to estimate drivers’ mental status and cognitive workload during driving tasks. However, most previous studies have focused on the EEG features at particular driver status, such as fatigue or distraction, with less attention paid to EEG response in emergent and safety–critical situations. This study aims to investigate the underlying patterns of different EEG components during an emergent collision avoidance process. Method: A driving simulator experiment was conducted with 38 participants (19 females and 19 males). The scenario included a roadside pedestrian who suddenly crossed the road when the driver approached. The participants’ EEG data were collected during the pedestrian-collision avoidance process. The log-transformed power and power ratio of four typical EEG components (i.e., delta, theta, alpha and beta) were extracted from four collision avoidance stages: Stage 1-normal driving stage, Stage 2-hazard perception stage, Stage 3-evasive action stage, and Stage 4-post-hazard stage. Results: The activities of all four EEG bands changed consistently during the collision avoidance process, with the power increased significantly from Stage 1 to Stage 4. Drivers who collided with the pedestrian and drivers who avoided the collision successfully did not show a significant difference in EEG activity across the stages. Male drivers had a higher delta power ratio and lower alpha power ratio than females in both hazard perception and evasive action stages. Conclusions: Enhanced activities of different EEG bands could be concurrent at emergent and safety–critical situations. Female drivers were more mentally aroused than male drivers during the collision avoidance process. Practical Applications: The study generates more understanding of drivers’ neurophysiological response in an emergent and safety–critical collision avoidance event. Driver state monitoring and warning systems that aim to assist drivers in impending collisions may utilize the patterns of EEG activity identified in the collision avoidance process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急避碰驾驶员脑电响应的探索性研究
导语:EEG (electroencephalogram,脑电图)作为一种评估驾驶员驾驶过程中精神状态和认知负荷的有效手段。然而,以往的研究大多集中在特定驾驶状态下的脑电特征,如疲劳或注意力分散,而对紧急和安全危急情况下的脑电反应关注较少。本研究旨在探讨紧急避碰过程中不同脑电成分的潜在模式。方法:对38名被试(男19女19)进行驾驶模拟器实验。这个场景包括一个路边行人,当司机靠近时,他突然过了马路。在行人避碰过程中采集受试者的脑电图数据。提取了1-正常驾驶阶段、2-危险感知阶段、3-回避行动阶段和4-事故后阶段四个典型脑电分量(delta、theta、alpha和beta)的对数变换功率和功率比。结果:在避碰过程中,4个脑电带的活动变化一致,从第1阶段到第4阶段,功率显著增加。与行人发生碰撞的司机和成功避免碰撞的司机在不同阶段的脑电图活动没有显着差异。在危险感知和规避行为阶段,男性驾驶员的δ功率比高于女性驾驶员,α功率比低于女性驾驶员。结论:在紧急和安全危急情况下,不同脑电波段的活动增强可以同时发生。在避碰过程中,女性驾驶员比男性驾驶员更容易被心理唤醒。实际应用:该研究对驾驶员在紧急和安全关键避碰事件中的神经生理反应有了更多的了解。驾驶员状态监测和预警系统旨在帮助驾驶员应对即将发生的碰撞,可以利用在避碰过程中识别的脑电图活动模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes: Assessing injury severity among distracted drivers in states with and without cell phone bans An evaluation of driver comprehension of the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon A systematic review of incentive schemes and their implications for truck driver safety performance Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1