Antiphospholipid antibodies: what is new in 2022

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annales de biologie clinique Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1684/abc.2022.1745
Sophie Melicine, Nicolas Gendron, Luc Darnige, Laetitia Mauge
{"title":"Antiphospholipid antibodies: what is new in 2022","authors":"Sophie Melicine, Nicolas Gendron, Luc Darnige, Laetitia Mauge","doi":"10.1684/abc.2022.1745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinicobiological entity defined by the association of thrombotic events and/or obstetric complications and the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) detected by coagulation tests (lupus anticoagulant, LAC) and/or immunological assays (anticardiolipin and anti-glycoprotein-beta-I antibodies). The increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is now a challenge for hematology laboratories for the diagnosis of APS. DOAC interfere with LAC screening and confirmation tests resulting in a risk of false positive results. To avoid these interferences, several solutions are suggested. Some of them rely on the use of DOAC-reversal systems (activated charcoal tablet, filter system) others on the use of reagents insensitive to DOAC presence in the sample. Detection of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies may be helpful because they are strongly associated to the presence of LAC and are increasingly recognized as a useful tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of APS. Finally, positivity of LA in the setting of a viral infection is frequent and not specific to APS. During the Covid-19 pandemic, many patients developed arterial and VTE that could suggest testing for aPLs. The association between LAC and a risk of VTE or in-hospital mortality in hospitalized Covid-19 patients was not demonstrated. Moreover, aPLs do not persist after Covid-19. Currently, testing for aPLs in Covid-19 patients is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":7892,"journal":{"name":"Annales de biologie clinique","volume":"80 4","pages":"333-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de biologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2022.1745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinicobiological entity defined by the association of thrombotic events and/or obstetric complications and the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) detected by coagulation tests (lupus anticoagulant, LAC) and/or immunological assays (anticardiolipin and anti-glycoprotein-beta-I antibodies). The increased use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is now a challenge for hematology laboratories for the diagnosis of APS. DOAC interfere with LAC screening and confirmation tests resulting in a risk of false positive results. To avoid these interferences, several solutions are suggested. Some of them rely on the use of DOAC-reversal systems (activated charcoal tablet, filter system) others on the use of reagents insensitive to DOAC presence in the sample. Detection of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies may be helpful because they are strongly associated to the presence of LAC and are increasingly recognized as a useful tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of APS. Finally, positivity of LA in the setting of a viral infection is frequent and not specific to APS. During the Covid-19 pandemic, many patients developed arterial and VTE that could suggest testing for aPLs. The association between LAC and a risk of VTE or in-hospital mortality in hospitalized Covid-19 patients was not demonstrated. Moreover, aPLs do not persist after Covid-19. Currently, testing for aPLs in Covid-19 patients is not recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗磷脂抗体:2022年的新动向
抗磷脂综合征(APS)是一种临床生物学实体,由血栓形成事件和/或产科并发症的关联以及通过凝血试验(狼疮抗凝剂,LAC)和/或免疫试验(抗心磷脂和抗糖蛋白- β - i抗体)检测到的持续抗磷脂抗体(apl)的存在所定义。直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)用于治疗静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的增加是血液学实验室诊断APS的一个挑战。DOAC干扰LAC筛选和确认测试,导致假阳性结果的风险。为了避免这些干扰,提出了几种解决方案。其中一些依赖于使用DOAC反转系统(活性炭片,过滤系统),另一些依赖于使用对样品中DOAC不敏感的试剂。检测抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原抗体可能是有帮助的,因为它们与LAC的存在密切相关,并且越来越被认为是APS诊断和预后的有用工具。最后,在病毒感染的情况下,LA阳性是常见的,而不是APS特有的。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,许多患者出现动脉和静脉血栓栓塞,这可能表明需要检测apl。未证实LAC与住院Covid-19患者静脉血栓栓塞风险或住院死亡率之间的关联。此外,在Covid-19之后,api不会持续存在。目前,不建议对Covid-19患者进行api检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales de biologie clinique
Annales de biologie clinique 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary information with direct relevance to everyday practice Annales de Biologie Clinique, the official journal of the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC), supports biologists in areas including continuing education, laboratory accreditation and technique validation. With original articles, abstracts and accounts of everyday practice, the journal provides details of advances in knowledge, techniques and equipment, as well as a forum for discussion open to the entire community.
期刊最新文献
[Atlas of flow cytometry images: lymphoproliferative syndromes - Additional images obtained with DxFlex]. [Use of heparin calibrated anti-Xa assay for apixaban and rivaroxaban measurement in the context of regional telestroke activity]. Importance of the reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent in the exclusion of latent iron deficiency. [Evaluation of a diagnostic test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: validation of a delayed test time]. Association between the Estrogen receptor β rs1256049 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk:a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1