Millennials Seeking Healthcare: Examining the Degree to Which Patients Utilize Online Resources.

Kansas Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol15.17125
Landon C Arensberg, Jessica Kalender-Rich, Jaehoon Lee, Cheryl A Gibson
{"title":"Millennials Seeking Healthcare: Examining the Degree to Which Patients Utilize Online Resources.","authors":"Landon C Arensberg,&nbsp;Jessica Kalender-Rich,&nbsp;Jaehoon Lee,&nbsp;Cheryl A Gibson","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.17125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>According to the 2020 U.S. Census, a Silver Tsunami is looming, with more than 75.4 million persons aged 57 to 75 expected to need more costly medical care. However, a larger wave of 83.1 million Millennials nearing adulthood is approaching rapidly. Therefore, it is important to understand how this population finds their physician and what may influence this decision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paper-based surveys were administered to adult patients at primary care and geriatric clinics located at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, Kansas. Questions included demographic information, utilization and influence of online reviews, and the effects negative and positive reviews have on a patient's choice of physician. Descriptive statistics were calculated for respondent characteristics and survey responses. Chi-square and McNemar's tests were performed to evaluate differences between age and gender groups, and to determine how influential review ratings are in choosing a physician for medical care. Statistical significance was determined at the 0.05 level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 284 patients completed the survey (44.35 ± 17.54 years old [range = 18-90], 60.6% female, 57.4% white). Of Millennials, 67.2% read online reviews before choosing a physician. Millennials were significantly more likely to read online reviews before choosing a physician (p = 0.004) and utilize online resources to search for a new physician (p < 0.001) than older patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Millennials were more likely to research online reviews before choosing a physician. Therefore, an online review presence will be beneficial to one's practice to acquire this new wave of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"347-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8b/d2/15-347.PMC9518714.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.17125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: According to the 2020 U.S. Census, a Silver Tsunami is looming, with more than 75.4 million persons aged 57 to 75 expected to need more costly medical care. However, a larger wave of 83.1 million Millennials nearing adulthood is approaching rapidly. Therefore, it is important to understand how this population finds their physician and what may influence this decision.

Methods: Paper-based surveys were administered to adult patients at primary care and geriatric clinics located at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, Kansas. Questions included demographic information, utilization and influence of online reviews, and the effects negative and positive reviews have on a patient's choice of physician. Descriptive statistics were calculated for respondent characteristics and survey responses. Chi-square and McNemar's tests were performed to evaluate differences between age and gender groups, and to determine how influential review ratings are in choosing a physician for medical care. Statistical significance was determined at the 0.05 level.

Results: A sample of 284 patients completed the survey (44.35 ± 17.54 years old [range = 18-90], 60.6% female, 57.4% white). Of Millennials, 67.2% read online reviews before choosing a physician. Millennials were significantly more likely to read online reviews before choosing a physician (p = 0.004) and utilize online resources to search for a new physician (p < 0.001) than older patients.

Conclusions: Millennials were more likely to research online reviews before choosing a physician. Therefore, an online review presence will be beneficial to one's practice to acquire this new wave of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
千禧一代寻求医疗保健:检查患者利用在线资源的程度。
导读:根据2020年美国人口普查,一场银色海啸即将来临,预计将有超过7540万57岁至75岁的人需要更昂贵的医疗服务。然而,8310万即将成年的千禧一代正在迅速到来。因此,了解这些人群如何找到他们的医生以及什么可能影响他们的决定是很重要的。方法:对位于堪萨斯州堪萨斯城堪萨斯大学医学中心的初级保健和老年诊所的成年患者进行纸质调查。问题包括人口统计信息、在线评论的利用和影响,以及负面和正面评论对患者选择医生的影响。对被调查者的特征和调查结果进行描述性统计。卡方检验和McNemar检验用于评估年龄和性别群体之间的差异,并确定评论评分在选择医疗保健医生方面的影响程度。在0.05水平上有统计学意义。结果:完成调查的284例患者(44.35±17.54岁[范围= 18-90岁],女性60.6%,白人57.4%)。在千禧一代中,67.2%的人在选择医生之前会阅读在线评论。与老年患者相比,千禧一代在选择医生之前更有可能阅读在线评论(p = 0.004),并利用在线资源搜索新医生(p < 0.001)。结论:千禧一代更有可能在选择医生之前研究在线评论。因此,在线评论的存在将有利于一个人的实践,以获得这一新的病人浪潮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Extensive Cholangiocarcinoma Highlighting Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment Evaluating the Long-Term Neurologic Sequelae Among Trauma Patients who Received Flexion-Extension Radiographs Ethical Obligation of Adequate Pain Management in Long Term Care Residents with Dementia Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer vs. Non-Cancer Patients A Case Report of Leclercia adecarboxylata Pyogenic Arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1