Are salivary flow rates associated with histopathologic aspects in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2022-10-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0120
Janaina Barbieri Dos Santos Helms, Carlos Augusto Barbosa, Aline Corrêa Abrahão, Marcia Grillo Cabral, Blanca Elena Rios Gomes Bica, Sandra Regina Torres
{"title":"Are salivary flow rates associated with histopathologic aspects in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?","authors":"Janaina Barbieri Dos Santos Helms,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Barbosa,&nbsp;Aline Corrêa Abrahão,&nbsp;Marcia Grillo Cabral,&nbsp;Blanca Elena Rios Gomes Bica,&nbsp;Sandra Regina Torres","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to verify the association between salivary flow rates (SFR) and the histopathologic aspects of labial salivary glands (LSG) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients presenting rheumatologic diseases referred for oral evaluation were included in the study if they had RA and had SFR measured and LSG biopsy performed. Patients were excluded if they had systemic conditions that affect SFR or if they were being treated for hyposalivation. Cases without enough material for histopathologic analysis were also excluded. Data were collected through questionnaires, oral examination, resting and stimulated SFR, and LSG biopsies. A histopathologic reevaluation was carried out in order to seek for additional histopathologic aspects. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 53.5 years (25-77), and 94.1% were women. The median resting and stimulated SFRs were 0.24 mL/min and 1.02 mL/min, respectively. The presence of lymphocytic focus and fibrosis were significantly associated with stimulated SFR, but not with resting SFR. The odds ratio of patients who had hyposalivation for presenting a positive lymphocytic focus was 7.33 (confidence interval CI: 1.53-35.23) by the stimulated technique, and 2.56 (CI: 0.57-11.40) in resting SFR. In the medical records, 14 (31.80%) patients had been diagnosed with secondary Sjögren's syndrome. In conclusion, stimulated SFR represent a good screening test to predict lymphocytic focus in LSG in patients with RA, which represents the most specific test to diagnose Sjögren's syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to verify the association between salivary flow rates (SFR) and the histopathologic aspects of labial salivary glands (LSG) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients presenting rheumatologic diseases referred for oral evaluation were included in the study if they had RA and had SFR measured and LSG biopsy performed. Patients were excluded if they had systemic conditions that affect SFR or if they were being treated for hyposalivation. Cases without enough material for histopathologic analysis were also excluded. Data were collected through questionnaires, oral examination, resting and stimulated SFR, and LSG biopsies. A histopathologic reevaluation was carried out in order to seek for additional histopathologic aspects. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 53.5 years (25-77), and 94.1% were women. The median resting and stimulated SFRs were 0.24 mL/min and 1.02 mL/min, respectively. The presence of lymphocytic focus and fibrosis were significantly associated with stimulated SFR, but not with resting SFR. The odds ratio of patients who had hyposalivation for presenting a positive lymphocytic focus was 7.33 (confidence interval CI: 1.53-35.23) by the stimulated technique, and 2.56 (CI: 0.57-11.40) in resting SFR. In the medical records, 14 (31.80%) patients had been diagnosed with secondary Sjögren's syndrome. In conclusion, stimulated SFR represent a good screening test to predict lymphocytic focus in LSG in patients with RA, which represents the most specific test to diagnose Sjögren's syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿关节炎患者的唾液流速与组织病理学相关吗?
本回顾性横断面研究的目的是验证类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者唾液流率(SFR)与唇唾液腺(LSG)的组织病理学方面之间的关系。有风湿病的患者进行口腔评估,如果他们患有类风湿性关节炎,并进行了SFR测量和LSG活检,则纳入研究。如果患者有影响SFR的全身性疾病或正在接受低通气治疗,则排除患者。没有足够材料进行组织病理学分析的病例也被排除在外。通过问卷调查、口腔检查、静息和刺激SFR以及LSG活检收集数据。为了寻找更多的组织病理学方面,进行了组织病理学重新评估。51例患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄53.5岁(25-77岁),94.1%为女性。静息时和受刺激时的平均SFRs分别为0.24 mL/min和1.02 mL/min。淋巴细胞病灶和纤维化的存在与刺激的SFR显著相关,但与静息的SFR无关。刺激技术下出现淋巴细胞灶阳性的低灌注患者的比值比为7.33(可信区间CI: 1.53-35.23),静息SFR为2.56(可信区间CI: 0.57-11.40)。在病历中,14例(31.80%)患者被诊断为继发性Sjögren综合征。综上所述,受刺激SFR是预测RA患者LSG淋巴细胞病灶的良好筛选试验,是诊断Sjögren综合征最特异性的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brazilian Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine: current state of the study of rare diseases. A novel low shrinkage dimethacrylate monomer as an alternative to BisGMA for adhesive and resin-based composite applications. A YOLO-V5 approach for the evaluation of normal fillings and overhanging fillings: an artificial intelligence study. Cross-cultural adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Scale for Brazilian adolescents. Influence of the digital file format on radiographic diagnostic in dentistry: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1