[Philo of Alexandria and his views on health and sickness].

Otto Kaiser
{"title":"[Philo of Alexandria and his views on health and sickness].","authors":"Otto Kaiser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Philo of Alexandria, Torah scholar and philosopher of religion, (c. 20 BC to 50 BCE) is the first Middle Platonic philosopher whom we know through his own works. His thinking was determined by the two antitheses of God and world, and virtue and vice. The Logos (divine reason) mediates between the transcendent God and the earthly world. His thoughts on health and illness and on the possibilities and limitations of medicine are testimony to his comprehensive philosophical education as well as to his belief in God as ruler of the world and of human life. He saw human health as the reward for self-control for which one was best prepared by the classical education programme. Self-control and physical exercise were therefore, in his view, possible guarantors of health, and a coach potentially more important than a physician. Illnesses, if they result from the loss of self-control, may point to the necessity for penitence. Philo therefore saw virtuousness as the safest precondition for a healthy and cheerful life. That the life forces increase during youth and diminish in old age is part of destiny. Similarly, illness can be brought about by strokes of fate. If illness occurred in this or any other way, medicine was there to help and its success or failure depended on divine providence. Like Jesus Sirach, the Jewish scholar who taught around a hundred years earlier, Philo did not think it sinful to use medical help if one was ill, seeing that God himself had made natural remedies available. He compared the importance of physicians for their patients to that other professionals have in people's lives. Philo did not provide a compendium on the work of the physician, but he gave indications, on nutrition for instance, or on the use of laxatives and fragrances, or that complaints can be necessary stages of recovery. Philo also asked himself whether physicians were always obliged to tell patients the truth. The only case of illness he described in sufficient detail was one of leprosy, which he diagnosed in accordance with Leviticus 13:2. Philo saw physicians as helpers of God, who was the Lord of life and who would therefore decide on the fate of the healthy and sick. Faith in God, Philo thought, was vital if one was to cope with life's ups and downs. Only the wicked had to fear death, however, while the souls of the righteous returned to heaven after death.</p>","PeriodicalId":81975,"journal":{"name":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","volume":"33 ","pages":"9-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philo of Alexandria, Torah scholar and philosopher of religion, (c. 20 BC to 50 BCE) is the first Middle Platonic philosopher whom we know through his own works. His thinking was determined by the two antitheses of God and world, and virtue and vice. The Logos (divine reason) mediates between the transcendent God and the earthly world. His thoughts on health and illness and on the possibilities and limitations of medicine are testimony to his comprehensive philosophical education as well as to his belief in God as ruler of the world and of human life. He saw human health as the reward for self-control for which one was best prepared by the classical education programme. Self-control and physical exercise were therefore, in his view, possible guarantors of health, and a coach potentially more important than a physician. Illnesses, if they result from the loss of self-control, may point to the necessity for penitence. Philo therefore saw virtuousness as the safest precondition for a healthy and cheerful life. That the life forces increase during youth and diminish in old age is part of destiny. Similarly, illness can be brought about by strokes of fate. If illness occurred in this or any other way, medicine was there to help and its success or failure depended on divine providence. Like Jesus Sirach, the Jewish scholar who taught around a hundred years earlier, Philo did not think it sinful to use medical help if one was ill, seeing that God himself had made natural remedies available. He compared the importance of physicians for their patients to that other professionals have in people's lives. Philo did not provide a compendium on the work of the physician, but he gave indications, on nutrition for instance, or on the use of laxatives and fragrances, or that complaints can be necessary stages of recovery. Philo also asked himself whether physicians were always obliged to tell patients the truth. The only case of illness he described in sufficient detail was one of leprosy, which he diagnosed in accordance with Leviticus 13:2. Philo saw physicians as helpers of God, who was the Lord of life and who would therefore decide on the fate of the healthy and sick. Faith in God, Philo thought, was vital if one was to cope with life's ups and downs. Only the wicked had to fear death, however, while the souls of the righteous returned to heaven after death.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚历山大的斐洛和他对健康和疾病的看法。
亚历山大的斐洛,托拉学者和宗教哲学家,(公元前20年至公元前50年)是我们通过他自己的作品所知道的第一位中世纪柏拉图派哲学家。他的思想是由上帝与世界、美德与罪恶这两种对立所决定的。逻各斯(神圣的理性)在超越的上帝和世俗世界之间进行调解。他对健康和疾病以及医学的可能性和局限性的思考证明了他全面的哲学教育,也证明了他相信上帝是世界和人类生活的统治者。他认为人类的健康是自我控制的回报,古典教育为自我控制做了最好的准备。因此,在他看来,自我控制和体育锻炼可能是健康的保证,教练可能比医生更重要。疾病,如果是由于自我控制的丧失而引起的,则可能表明忏悔的必要性。因此,斐洛认为美德是健康快乐生活的最安全的先决条件。青春时生命力增强,老年时生命力减弱,这是命运的一部分。同样地,疾病也可能是由命运的打击引起的。如果疾病以这样或那样的方式发生,医学就会提供帮助,它的成功或失败取决于神的旨意。就像大约一百年前的犹太学者西拉赫(Jesus Sirach)一样,菲罗认为生病时使用药物治疗并不是有罪的,因为他看到上帝自己已经创造了自然疗法。他将医生对病人的重要性与其他专业人士在人们生活中的重要性进行了比较。斐洛没有提供医生工作的概要,但他给出了一些指示,例如营养,泻药和香水的使用,或者抱怨可能是恢复的必要阶段。菲洛也问自己,医生是否总是有义务告诉病人真相。他唯一详细描述的疾病是麻风病,他根据利未记13章2节诊断出麻风病。斐洛认为医生是上帝的帮手,上帝是生命的主宰,因此决定健康和生病的人的命运。菲洛认为,如果一个人要应对人生的起起落落,对上帝的信仰是至关重要的。然而,只有恶人才会害怕死亡,而义人的灵魂在死后会回到天堂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Poverty and Sickness. The precarious lives of lower-class families in Würzburg and Göttingen, 1800-1850]. [The Hygienist Karl Roelcke, M.D. (1907-1982). Annotations to the family biography]. [Gender images in health education: a comparison between East and West Germany (1949-1990)]. [Protestant clergymen among Hahnemann's clientele. Patient histories in letters]. [The company Willmar Schwabe in the Nazi era].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1