下载PDF
{"title":"Effects of anatomical differences on electromagnetic fields, SAR, and temperature change","authors":"Leeor Alon, Cem M. Deniz, Giuseppe Carluccio, Ryan Brown, Daniel K. Sodickson, Christopher M. Collins","doi":"10.1002/cmr.b.21317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Electromagnetic field simulations are increasingly used to assure RF safety of patients during MRI exams. In practice, however, tissue property distribution of the patient being imaged is not known, but may be represented with a pre-existing model. Repeatedly, agreement in transmit magnetic (\n) field distributions between two geometries has been used to suggest agreement in heating distributions. Here we examine relative effects of anatomical differences on \n distribution, specific absorption rate (SAR), and temperature change (Δ<i>T</i>). Numerical simulations were performed for a single surface coil positioned adjacent a homogeneous phantom and bovine phantom, each with slight geometric variations, and adjacent two different human body models. Experimental demonstration was performed on a bovine phantom using MR thermometry and \n mapping. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that \n distributions in different samples can be well correlated, while notable difference in maximum SAR and Δ<i>T</i> occur. This work illustrates challenges associated with utilizing simulations or experiments for RF safety assurance purposes. Reliance on \n distributions alone for validation of simulations and/or experiments with a sample or subject for assurance of safety in another should be performed with caution. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 46B: 8–18, 2016</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50623,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","volume":"46 1","pages":"8-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.b.21317","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.b.21317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Electromagnetic field simulations are increasingly used to assure RF safety of patients during MRI exams. In practice, however, tissue property distribution of the patient being imaged is not known, but may be represented with a pre-existing model. Repeatedly, agreement in transmit magnetic (
) field distributions between two geometries has been used to suggest agreement in heating distributions. Here we examine relative effects of anatomical differences on
distribution, specific absorption rate (SAR), and temperature change (ΔT ). Numerical simulations were performed for a single surface coil positioned adjacent a homogeneous phantom and bovine phantom, each with slight geometric variations, and adjacent two different human body models. Experimental demonstration was performed on a bovine phantom using MR thermometry and
mapping. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that
distributions in different samples can be well correlated, while notable difference in maximum SAR and ΔT occur. This work illustrates challenges associated with utilizing simulations or experiments for RF safety assurance purposes. Reliance on
distributions alone for validation of simulations and/or experiments with a sample or subject for assurance of safety in another should be performed with caution. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 46B: 8–18, 2016
解剖差异对电磁场、SAR和温度变化的影响
电磁场模拟越来越多地用于确保患者在MRI检查期间的射频安全。然而,在实践中,被成像患者的组织特性分布是未知的,但可以用预先存在的模型表示。两种几何形状之间传输磁场分布的一致性一再被用来表明加热分布的一致性。在这里,我们研究了解剖差异对分布、比吸收率(SAR)和温度变化的相对影响(ΔT)。将单个表面线圈放置在具有轻微几何变化的均匀体模和牛体模之间,并与两个不同的人体模型相邻,进行了数值模拟。利用磁共振测温和成像技术在牛体上进行了实验演示。模拟和实验表明,不同样品的分布具有良好的相关性,但最大SAR和ΔT存在显著差异。这项工作说明了利用模拟或实验来保证射频安全的挑战。仅依靠分布来验证模拟和/或用样品或对象进行的实验,以确保在另一个样品或对象中的安全性,应谨慎进行。©2015 Wiley期刊公司机械工程B辑(工学版),46 (1):8-18,2016
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。