A Gas Pressure Scale Based on Primary Standard Piston Gauges.

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Pub Date : 2010-12-01 Print Date: 2010-11-01 DOI:10.6028/jres.115.027
Douglas A Olson, R Greg Driver, Walter J Bowers
{"title":"A Gas Pressure Scale Based on Primary Standard Piston Gauges.","authors":"Douglas A Olson,&nbsp;R Greg Driver,&nbsp;Walter J Bowers","doi":"10.6028/jres.115.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has redefined its gas pressure scale, up to 17 MPa, based on two primary standard piston gauges. The primary standard piston gauges are 35.8 mm in diameter and operate from 20 kPa to 1 MPa. Ten secondary standard piston gauges, two each of five series of the Ruska 2465 type, with successively smaller diameters form the scale extending up to 17 MPa. Six of the piston gauges were directly compared to the primary standards to determine their effective area and expanded (k = 2) uncertainty. Two piston gauges operating to 7 MPa were compared to the 1.4 MPa gauges, and two piston gauges operating to 17 MPa were compared to the 7 MPa gauges. Distortion in the 7 MPa piston gauges was determined by comparing those gauges to a DH Instruments PG7601 type piston gauge, whose distortion was calculated using elasticity theory. The relative standard uncertainties achieved by the primary standards range from 3.0 × 10(-6) to 3.2 × 10(-6). The relative standard uncertainty of the secondary standards is as low as 4.2 × 10(-6) at 300 kPa. The effective areas and uncertainties were validated by comparison to standards of other National Metrology Institutes (NMIs). Results show agreement in all cases to better than the expanded (k = 2) uncertainty of the difference between NIST and the other NMIs, and in most cases to better than the standard (k = 1) uncertainty of the difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":17039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548863/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.115.027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has redefined its gas pressure scale, up to 17 MPa, based on two primary standard piston gauges. The primary standard piston gauges are 35.8 mm in diameter and operate from 20 kPa to 1 MPa. Ten secondary standard piston gauges, two each of five series of the Ruska 2465 type, with successively smaller diameters form the scale extending up to 17 MPa. Six of the piston gauges were directly compared to the primary standards to determine their effective area and expanded (k = 2) uncertainty. Two piston gauges operating to 7 MPa were compared to the 1.4 MPa gauges, and two piston gauges operating to 17 MPa were compared to the 7 MPa gauges. Distortion in the 7 MPa piston gauges was determined by comparing those gauges to a DH Instruments PG7601 type piston gauge, whose distortion was calculated using elasticity theory. The relative standard uncertainties achieved by the primary standards range from 3.0 × 10(-6) to 3.2 × 10(-6). The relative standard uncertainty of the secondary standards is as low as 4.2 × 10(-6) at 300 kPa. The effective areas and uncertainties were validated by comparison to standards of other National Metrology Institutes (NMIs). Results show agreement in all cases to better than the expanded (k = 2) uncertainty of the difference between NIST and the other NMIs, and in most cases to better than the standard (k = 1) uncertainty of the difference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于初级标准活塞压力表的气体压力刻度。
美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)重新定义了其气体压力刻度,最高可达17 MPa,基于两个主要标准活塞压力表。主要标准活塞压力表的直径为35.8毫米,工作范围为20千帕至1兆帕。十个二级标准活塞压力表,五个系列的Ruska 2465型各两个,直径依次较小,形成规模延伸至17兆帕。6个活塞压力表直接与主要标准进行比较,以确定其有效面积和扩展(k = 2)不确定度。将两个工作在7mpa的活塞式压力表与1.4 MPa的压力表进行比较,将两个工作在17mpa的活塞式压力表与7mpa的压力表进行比较。通过与DH Instruments PG7601型活塞式压力表的比较,确定了7mpa活塞式压力表的变形,PG7601型活塞式压力表的变形是用弹性理论计算的。主要标准的相对标准不确定度在3.0 × 10(-6) ~ 3.2 × 10(-6)之间。在300 kPa时,二级标准的相对标准不确定度低至4.2 × 10(-6)。通过与其他国家计量院标准的比较,验证了有效面积和不确定度。结果表明,在所有情况下,一致性都优于NIST与其他nmi之间的扩展(k = 2)不确定度的差异,并且在大多数情况下优于标准(k = 1)不确定度的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is the flagship publication of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It has been published under various titles and forms since 1904, with its roots as Scientific Papers issued as the Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. In 1928, the Scientific Papers were combined with Technologic Papers, which reported results of investigations of material and methods of testing. This new publication was titled the Bureau of Standards Journal of Research. The Journal of Research of NIST reports NIST research and development in metrology and related fields of physical science, engineering, applied mathematics, statistics, biotechnology, information technology.
期刊最新文献
Design Considerations for a Surface Disinfection Device Using Ultraviolet-C Light-Emitting Diodes. AbsorbanceQ: An App for Generating Absorbance Images from Brightfield Images. Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy as a Potential Label-Free Method to Rapidly Verify Ultraviolet-C Radiation Disinfection. Perspectives and Recommendations Regarding Standards for Ultraviolet-C Whole-Room Disinfection in Healthcare. Evaluations of a Detector-Limited Digital Impedance Bridge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1