Doctors and Their Patients in the Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries.

Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Marion Baschin, Elisabeth Dietrich-Daum, Iris Ritzmann
{"title":"Doctors and Their Patients in the Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries.","authors":"Marion Baschin,&nbsp;Elisabeth Dietrich-Daum,&nbsp;Iris Ritzmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How can these finings be interpreted in conclusion? Analysis has revealed firstly that, depending on the chosen period, the socio-geographical situation and the profile of the individual doctor's practice, the clientele varied widely in terms of gender, age and social rank. The consultation behaviour of men and women changed noticeably. Findings overall suggest that up until t8o the gender distribution varied in the individual practices. There was a trend for women to be overrepresented in urban practices during the earlier period. But in general, from the mid-nineteenth century they predominated - in towns as well as in the country in allopathic as well as homeopathic practices. The absence of children, which was bemoaned by many physicians, did not apply to the practices under investigation. On the contrary: the percentage is consistently high while older patients remained underrepresented right up until the end of the period under investigation, even though their proportion increased in the individual practices during the course of the nineteenth century In each of the nineteenth century practices investigated - and increasingly among the lower and middle classes - the physicians' services were used by several members of the same family. We have found no evidence to support the thesis that up until the nineteenth century academic physicians were mainly consulted by aristocratic or wealthy bourgeois patients. The theory probably applies only to early modern urban doctors. In the practices examined here, from the middle of the eighteenth century, patients from all social strata went to consult physicians. The participation of members of the lower classes or from an artisanal, (proto) industrial or agricultural background clearly increased over time 'despite ubiquitous economic and cultural barriers. That the annual numbers of consultations per physician increased - despite the growing number of physicians available - suggests that for economically disadvantaged social groups also, the consultation of learned physicians became more common: in towns from the first half of the nineteenth century and in the country from the middle of the century. In addition, the individual findings reveal that, prior to the introduction of statutory health insurance for salaried persons, patients of more secure social standing consulted a physician considerably more frequently in the course of the year than lower class patients. While the patient structure clearly changed around 1800, the relationship between physician and patient continued without major changes from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century. The therapeutic encounter up until the end of the investigated period can be summarized as a negotiation process. Patients were discerning in their choice of healer and did not refrain from using rival services. They sought help for unpleasant symptoms such as indigestion, pain or fever, and only rarely in cases of emergency Therapy was decided on after an exchange between a critical and autonomous client and the medical specialist who was generally willing to compromise. While the patient structure clearly changed around 1800, the relationship between physician and patient continued without major changes from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century. The therapeutic encounter up until the end of the investigated period can be summarized as a negotiation process. Patients were discerning in their choice of healer and did not refrain from using rival services. they sought help for unpleasant symptoms such as indigestion, pain or fever, and only rarely in cases of emergency. Therapy was decided on after an exchange between critical and autonomous client and the medical specialist who was generally willing to compromise.</p>","PeriodicalId":75720,"journal":{"name":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"96 ","pages":"39-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clio medica (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How can these finings be interpreted in conclusion? Analysis has revealed firstly that, depending on the chosen period, the socio-geographical situation and the profile of the individual doctor's practice, the clientele varied widely in terms of gender, age and social rank. The consultation behaviour of men and women changed noticeably. Findings overall suggest that up until t8o the gender distribution varied in the individual practices. There was a trend for women to be overrepresented in urban practices during the earlier period. But in general, from the mid-nineteenth century they predominated - in towns as well as in the country in allopathic as well as homeopathic practices. The absence of children, which was bemoaned by many physicians, did not apply to the practices under investigation. On the contrary: the percentage is consistently high while older patients remained underrepresented right up until the end of the period under investigation, even though their proportion increased in the individual practices during the course of the nineteenth century In each of the nineteenth century practices investigated - and increasingly among the lower and middle classes - the physicians' services were used by several members of the same family. We have found no evidence to support the thesis that up until the nineteenth century academic physicians were mainly consulted by aristocratic or wealthy bourgeois patients. The theory probably applies only to early modern urban doctors. In the practices examined here, from the middle of the eighteenth century, patients from all social strata went to consult physicians. The participation of members of the lower classes or from an artisanal, (proto) industrial or agricultural background clearly increased over time 'despite ubiquitous economic and cultural barriers. That the annual numbers of consultations per physician increased - despite the growing number of physicians available - suggests that for economically disadvantaged social groups also, the consultation of learned physicians became more common: in towns from the first half of the nineteenth century and in the country from the middle of the century. In addition, the individual findings reveal that, prior to the introduction of statutory health insurance for salaried persons, patients of more secure social standing consulted a physician considerably more frequently in the course of the year than lower class patients. While the patient structure clearly changed around 1800, the relationship between physician and patient continued without major changes from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century. The therapeutic encounter up until the end of the investigated period can be summarized as a negotiation process. Patients were discerning in their choice of healer and did not refrain from using rival services. They sought help for unpleasant symptoms such as indigestion, pain or fever, and only rarely in cases of emergency Therapy was decided on after an exchange between a critical and autonomous client and the medical specialist who was generally willing to compromise. While the patient structure clearly changed around 1800, the relationship between physician and patient continued without major changes from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century. The therapeutic encounter up until the end of the investigated period can be summarized as a negotiation process. Patients were discerning in their choice of healer and did not refrain from using rival services. they sought help for unpleasant symptoms such as indigestion, pain or fever, and only rarely in cases of emergency. Therapy was decided on after an exchange between critical and autonomous client and the medical specialist who was generally willing to compromise.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
17至19世纪的医生和病人。
在结论中如何解释这些结论呢?分析首先表明,根据所选择的时期、社会地理情况和医生个人执业情况的不同,客户在性别、年龄和社会地位方面差别很大。男性和女性的咨询行为发生了显著变化。研究结果总体上表明,直到1980年,性别分布在个体实践中有所不同。在较早时期,妇女在城市实践中所占比例过高是一种趋势。但总的来说,从19世纪中期开始,它们在城镇和乡村的对抗疗法和顺势疗法中占主导地位。许多医生都对儿童的缺席感到惋惜,但这并不适用于被调查的做法。相反,直到调查结束,老年患者的比例一直很高,尽管他们在19世纪的个人实践中所占的比例有所增加,但在19世纪的每一次调查中,医生的服务都是由同一个家庭的几个成员使用的,并且越来越多地出现在下层和中产阶级中。我们没有发现任何证据支持这样的论点,即直到19世纪,学术医生主要是由贵族或富有的资产阶级病人咨询的。这个理论可能只适用于早期的现代城市医生。在这里研究的实践中,从18世纪中叶开始,来自社会各个阶层的病人都去咨询医生。尽管经济和文化障碍无处不在,但随着时间的推移,下层阶级成员或来自手工、(原型)工业或农业背景的成员的参与明显增加。尽管有越来越多的医生可供选择,但每位医生每年的咨询人数还是增加了,这表明对于经济上处于不利地位的社会群体来说,有学问的医生的咨询也变得更加普遍:从19世纪上半叶开始,在城镇,从19世纪中叶开始,在乡村。此外,个别调查结果显示,在对受薪人员实行法定健康保险之前,社会地位较有保障的患者在一年中看医生的次数要比社会地位较低的患者多得多。虽然病人的结构在1800年左右发生了明显的变化,但从17世纪到19世纪,医生和病人之间的关系没有发生重大变化。直到调查期结束的治疗遭遇可以总结为一个谈判过程。患者在选择治疗者时很有眼光,并没有避免使用竞争对手的服务。他们会在出现消化不良、疼痛或发烧等令人不快的症状时寻求帮助,只有在罕见的紧急情况下,才会在关键的、自主的病人与通常愿意妥协的医学专家交流后决定治疗方案。虽然病人的结构在1800年左右发生了明显的变化,但从17世纪到19世纪,医生和病人之间的关系没有发生重大变化。直到调查期结束的治疗遭遇可以总结为一个谈判过程。患者在选择治疗者时很有眼光,并没有避免使用竞争对手的服务。他们在出现消化不良、疼痛或发烧等不愉快的症状时寻求帮助,只有在紧急情况下才会寻求帮助。在关键和自主的客户与通常愿意妥协的医学专家之间进行交流后,决定治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'Andromeda freed from her chains': attitudes towards women and the oral contraceptive pill, 1950-1970. Introduction. Cornucopia Officinae Medicae: Medical Practice Records and Their Origin. Doctors and Their Patients in the Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries. Daily Business: The Organization and Finances of Doctors' Practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1