Doctors' Perceptions and Practices of Breaking Bad News: A Qualitative Study From Greece.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2017-06-01 Epub Date: 2016-07-01 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2016.1167991
Despoina Oikonomidou, Fotios Anagnostopoulos, Christine Dimitrakaki, Dimitrios Ploumpidis, Stylianos Stylianidis, Yannis Tountas
{"title":"Doctors' Perceptions and Practices of Breaking Bad News: A Qualitative Study From Greece.","authors":"Despoina Oikonomidou,&nbsp;Fotios Anagnostopoulos,&nbsp;Christine Dimitrakaki,&nbsp;Dimitrios Ploumpidis,&nbsp;Stylianos Stylianidis,&nbsp;Yannis Tountas","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2016.1167991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is limited information about doctors' communication behaviors and their salient beliefs with regard to bad news disclosure in Greece. In this qualitative study we investigated the self-reported practices of doctors on breaking bad news, their perceptions about the factors affecting the delivery of such news, and their beliefs about the most appropriate disclosure manner. A focus group discussion and individual interviews were conducted. Twenty-five resident and specialist doctors from primary health care and hospital settings participated. We analyzed the collected data with content analysis techniques. Participants were found to acknowledge the importance of appropriate and effective delivery of bad news; however, none of them reported the implementation of empirically informed communication practices. They described communication patterns mainly formed by their work experience and often guided by the patient's family requests. Doctor, patient, and family characteristics and organizational features and resources were reported to affect the delivery of bad news. Participants perceived the most appropriate disclosure manner as an individualized approach to each patient's unique needs. They suggested an interdisciplinary, collaborative management of the delivery process and the establishment of formal supportive services. These findings may provide useful information for the development of tailored, empirically informed curriculum interventions and educational programs in order to address several barriers to communication. Sociocultural characteristics that influence the disclosure practice, as well as physicians' perceptions that are consistent with the optimal information delivery, should be taken into account. System-level strategies that focus on the development of patient-centered communication also need to be prioritized.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":"32 6","pages":"657-666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10410236.2016.1167991","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1167991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

There is limited information about doctors' communication behaviors and their salient beliefs with regard to bad news disclosure in Greece. In this qualitative study we investigated the self-reported practices of doctors on breaking bad news, their perceptions about the factors affecting the delivery of such news, and their beliefs about the most appropriate disclosure manner. A focus group discussion and individual interviews were conducted. Twenty-five resident and specialist doctors from primary health care and hospital settings participated. We analyzed the collected data with content analysis techniques. Participants were found to acknowledge the importance of appropriate and effective delivery of bad news; however, none of them reported the implementation of empirically informed communication practices. They described communication patterns mainly formed by their work experience and often guided by the patient's family requests. Doctor, patient, and family characteristics and organizational features and resources were reported to affect the delivery of bad news. Participants perceived the most appropriate disclosure manner as an individualized approach to each patient's unique needs. They suggested an interdisciplinary, collaborative management of the delivery process and the establishment of formal supportive services. These findings may provide useful information for the development of tailored, empirically informed curriculum interventions and educational programs in order to address several barriers to communication. Sociocultural characteristics that influence the disclosure practice, as well as physicians' perceptions that are consistent with the optimal information delivery, should be taken into account. System-level strategies that focus on the development of patient-centered communication also need to be prioritized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对突发坏消息的认知和实践:来自希腊的定性研究。
关于希腊医生的沟通行为和他们对坏消息披露的突出信念的信息有限。在这一定性研究中,我们调查了医生在披露坏消息时的自我报告实践,他们对影响消息传递的因素的看法,以及他们对最适当的披露方式的信念。进行了焦点小组讨论和个别访谈。来自初级保健和医院的25名住院医生和专科医生参加了会议。我们使用内容分析技术对收集到的数据进行分析。研究发现,参与者承认适当而有效地传递坏消息的重要性;然而,他们中没有一个报告了经验性知情沟通实践的实施。他们描述的沟通模式主要是由他们的工作经验形成的,通常由患者家属的要求指导。据报道,医生、患者、家庭特征以及组织特征和资源会影响坏消息的传递。参与者认为最合适的披露方式是针对每位患者独特需求的个性化方法。他们建议对交付过程进行跨学科的协作管理,并建立正式的支助服务。这些发现可能为量身定制的、经验丰富的课程干预和教育计划的发展提供有用的信息,以解决几个沟通障碍。应考虑到影响信息披露实践的社会文化特征,以及医生与最佳信息传递相一致的看法。注重发展以患者为中心的交流的系统级战略也需要优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Impact of UK National Clinical Communication Guidelines on Adults' Perceptions of Doctors and Treatment Commitment. Prioritizing the Values, Wishes, and Needs of Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Secondary Linguistic Analysis. Reporting on the "Next Generation of Nicotine Addicts": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of How the Australian Media has Covered and Constructed Youth Vaping (2018-2023). Thinking Outside of Yourself: The Potential of Awe in Mitigating Psychological Reactance Via Inspiring Self-Transcendence. In Whom We Trust: The Effect of Trust, Subjective Norms, and Socioeconomic Status on Attitudes and COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1