The Combined Impact of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus on Significant Coronary Artery Disease and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis.
Bong-Joon Kim, Sang-Hoon Cho, Kyoung-Im Cho, Hyun-Su Kim, Jung-Ho Heo, Tae-Joon Cha
{"title":"The Combined Impact of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus on Significant Coronary Artery Disease and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis.","authors":"Bong-Joon Kim, Sang-Hoon Cho, Kyoung-Im Cho, Hyun-Su Kim, Jung-Ho Heo, Tae-Joon Cha","doi":"10.4250/jcu.2016.24.2.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has recently emerged as a new important inflammatory marker for predicting cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the combined impact of NLR and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and carotid artery atherosclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes a total of 828 patients evaluated by coronary angiography and carotid ultrasonography. Significant CAD was defined as at least one vessel with stenosis greater than 50%. We employed logistic regression models to investigate the association of NLR and T2DM with significant CAD. The goodness-of-fit and discriminability of the models were assessed by the loglikelihood ratio test and C-index, respectively. Also, we investigated the clinical relevance of the categorized NLR that classifies patients into three risk groups (low, intermediate, high).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to logistic regression analysis, both NLR {adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.31, p < 0.001} and T2DM (adjusted OR 2.46, p = 0.006) were independent risk factors of significant CAD. The addition of NLR and T2DM into a logistic regression model including conventional cardiovascular risk factors significantly improved the goodness-of-fit (p < 0.001) and the discriminability of the model (p = 0.004). Also, T2DM patients assigned into the high risk group (NLR > 2) showed the greater prevalence of significant CAD and carotid artery atherosclerosis compared with patients without T2DM or type 2 diabetic patients assigned into the low risk group (NLR ≤ 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that type 2 diabetic patients with high inflammatory state would be more vulnerable to significant CAD and carotid artery atherosclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":88913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","volume":"24 2","pages":"115-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.2.115","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2016.24.2.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34
Abstract
Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has recently emerged as a new important inflammatory marker for predicting cardiovascular events. This study aimed to evaluate the combined impact of NLR and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and carotid artery atherosclerosis.
Methods: This study includes a total of 828 patients evaluated by coronary angiography and carotid ultrasonography. Significant CAD was defined as at least one vessel with stenosis greater than 50%. We employed logistic regression models to investigate the association of NLR and T2DM with significant CAD. The goodness-of-fit and discriminability of the models were assessed by the loglikelihood ratio test and C-index, respectively. Also, we investigated the clinical relevance of the categorized NLR that classifies patients into three risk groups (low, intermediate, high).
Results: According to logistic regression analysis, both NLR {adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.31, p < 0.001} and T2DM (adjusted OR 2.46, p = 0.006) were independent risk factors of significant CAD. The addition of NLR and T2DM into a logistic regression model including conventional cardiovascular risk factors significantly improved the goodness-of-fit (p < 0.001) and the discriminability of the model (p = 0.004). Also, T2DM patients assigned into the high risk group (NLR > 2) showed the greater prevalence of significant CAD and carotid artery atherosclerosis compared with patients without T2DM or type 2 diabetic patients assigned into the low risk group (NLR ≤ 1).
Conclusion: Our results suggest that type 2 diabetic patients with high inflammatory state would be more vulnerable to significant CAD and carotid artery atherosclerosis.