Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department.

Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound Pub Date : 2017-03-01 Epub Date: 2017-03-27 DOI:10.4250/jcu.2017.25.1.20
Kyung-Hee Kim, Sang-Hoon Na, Jin-Sik Park
{"title":"Role of Quantitative Wall Motion Analysis in Patients with Acute Chest Pain at Emergency Department.","authors":"Kyung-Hee Kim,&nbsp;Sang-Hoon Na,&nbsp;Jin-Sik Park","doi":"10.4250/jcu.2017.25.1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of acute chest pain in emergency department (ED), using limited resource and time, is still very difficult despite recent development of many diagnostic tools. In this study, we tried to determine the applicability of new semi-automated cardiac function analysis tool, velocity vector imaging (VVI), in the evaluation of the patients with acute chest pain in ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 48 patients, who visited ED with acute chest pain, and store images to analyze VVI from July 2005 to July 2007.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 677 of 768 segments (88%), the analysis by VVI was feasible among 48 patients. Peak systolic radial velocity (V<sub>peak</sub>) and strain significantly decreased according to visual regional wall motion abnormality (V<sub>peak</sub>, 3.50 ± 1.34 cm/s for normal vs. 3.46 ± 1.52 cm/s for hypokinesia, 2.51 ± 1.26 for akinesia, <i>p</i> < 0.01; peak systolic radial strain -31.74 ± 9.15% fornormal, -24.33 ± 6.28% for hypokinesia, -20.30 ± 7.78% for akinesia, <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, the velocity vectors at the time of mitral valve opening (MVO) were directed outward in the visually normal myocardium, inward velocity vectors were revealed in the visually akinetic area (V<sub>MVO</sub>, -0.85 ± 1.65 cm/s for normal vs. 0.10 ± 1.46 cm/s for akinesia, <i>p</i> < 0.001). At coronary angiography, V<sub>MVO</sub> clearly increased in the ischemic area (V<sub>MVO</sub>, -0.88+1.56 cm/s for normal vs. 0.70 + 2.04 cm/s for ischemic area, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regional wall motion assessment using VVI showed could be used to detect significant ischemia in the patient with acute chest pain at ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":88913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","volume":"25 1","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4250/jcu.2017.25.1.20","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2017.25.1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of acute chest pain in emergency department (ED), using limited resource and time, is still very difficult despite recent development of many diagnostic tools. In this study, we tried to determine the applicability of new semi-automated cardiac function analysis tool, velocity vector imaging (VVI), in the evaluation of the patients with acute chest pain in ED.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 48 patients, who visited ED with acute chest pain, and store images to analyze VVI from July 2005 to July 2007.

Results: In 677 of 768 segments (88%), the analysis by VVI was feasible among 48 patients. Peak systolic radial velocity (Vpeak) and strain significantly decreased according to visual regional wall motion abnormality (Vpeak, 3.50 ± 1.34 cm/s for normal vs. 3.46 ± 1.52 cm/s for hypokinesia, 2.51 ± 1.26 for akinesia, p < 0.01; peak systolic radial strain -31.74 ± 9.15% fornormal, -24.33 ± 6.28% for hypokinesia, -20.30 ± 7.78% for akinesia, p < 0.01). However, the velocity vectors at the time of mitral valve opening (MVO) were directed outward in the visually normal myocardium, inward velocity vectors were revealed in the visually akinetic area (VMVO, -0.85 ± 1.65 cm/s for normal vs. 0.10 ± 1.46 cm/s for akinesia, p < 0.001). At coronary angiography, VMVO clearly increased in the ischemic area (VMVO, -0.88+1.56 cm/s for normal vs. 0.70 + 2.04 cm/s for ischemic area, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Regional wall motion assessment using VVI showed could be used to detect significant ischemia in the patient with acute chest pain at ED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量壁运动分析在急诊科急性胸痛患者中的作用。
背景:尽管最近发展了许多诊断工具,但急诊部门(ED)急性胸痛的评估仍然非常困难,使用有限的资源和时间。在这项研究中,我们试图确定新的半自动化心功能分析工具——速度矢量成像(VVI)在ED急性胸痛患者评估中的适用性。方法:我们前瞻性地纳入了2005年7月至2007年7月48例因急性胸痛就诊ED的患者,并存储图像以分析VVI。结果:在48例患者中,768个节段中有677个(88%)可用VVI分析。视区壁运动异常显著降低收缩期径向速度峰值(Vpeak)和应变(正常组为3.50±1.34 cm/s,运动不足组为3.46±1.52 cm/s,运动不足组为2.51±1.26 cm/s, p < 0.01;收缩期径向峰值应变正常组为-31.74±9.15%,运动不足组为-24.33±6.28%,运动不足组为-20.30±7.78%,p < 0.01)。然而,在视觉正常的心肌中,二尖瓣打开时的速度矢量向外指向,在视觉运动区显示向内的速度矢量(VMVO,正常心肌为-0.85±1.65 cm/s,运动心肌为0.10±1.46 cm/s, p < 0.001)。冠状动脉造影时,缺血区VMVO明显升高(正常区VMVO为-0.88+1.56 cm/s,缺血区VMVO为0.70 + 2.04 cm/s, p < 0.01)。结论:VVI局部壁运动评价可用于诊断急诊科急性胸痛患者的明显缺血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long Term Outcomes of Left Atrial Reservoir Function in Children with a History of Kawasaki Disease. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity Related to Anti-Cancer Treatment in Clinical Practice: An Opinion Paper from the Working Group on Cardio-Oncology of the Korean Society of Echocardiography. Impact of a Geometric Correction for Proximal Flow Constraint on the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Proximal Flow Convergence Method. Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction Caused by Intra-cardiac Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma during Cancer Treatment. A Rare Case of Left Ventricular Noncompaction in LEOPARD Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1