KRAS testing and first-line treatment among patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer using population data from ten National Program of Cancer Registries in the United States.

Journal of cancer research & therapy Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-01-30 DOI:10.14312/2052-4994.2017-2
Adriana Rico, Lori A Pollack, Trevor D Thompson, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Jordan J Karlitz, Dee W West, John M Rainey, Vivien W Chen
{"title":"<i>KRAS</i> testing and first-line treatment among patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer using population data from ten National Program of Cancer Registries in the United States.","authors":"Adriana Rico, Lori A Pollack, Trevor D Thompson, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Jordan J Karlitz, Dee W West, John M Rainey, Vivien W Chen","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2017-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2011, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended <i>KRAS</i> testing for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Our study assessed <i>KRAS</i> testing prevalence and its association with socio-demographic and clinical factors and examined first-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten state population-based registries supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) collected detailed cancer information on mCRC cases diagnosed in 2011, including <i>KRAS</i> biomarker testing and first-line treatment from ten central cancer registries. Data were analyzed with Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,608 mCRC cases, 27% (n = 992) had a documented <i>KRAS</i> test. Increased age at diagnosis (p < 0.0001), racial/ethnic minorities (p = 0.0155), public insurance (p = 0.0018), and lower census tract education (p = 0.0023) were associated with less <i>KRAS</i> testing. Significant geographic variation in <i>KRAS</i> testing (p < 0.0001) ranged from 46% in New Hampshire to 18% in California. After adjusting for all covariates, age and residence at diagnosis (both p < 0.0001) remained predictors of <i>KRAS</i> testing. Non-Hispanic Blacks had less <i>KRAS</i> testing than non-Hispanic Whites (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61-0.97). Among those tested and found to have normal (wild-type) <i>KRAS</i>, 7% received anti-EGFR treatment; none received such treatment among those with <i>KRAS</i> mutated gene.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite NCCN guideline recommendations, 73% of mCRC cases diagnosed in 2011 had no documented <i>KRAS</i> test. Disparities in <i>KRAS</i> testing existed based on age, race, and residence at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>These findings show the capacity of monitoring <i>KRAS</i> testing in the US using cancer registry data and suggest the need to understand the low uptake of <i>KRAS</i> testing, and associated treatment choices during the first year since diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"5 2","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5472357/pdf/nihms856719.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2017-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2011, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended KRAS testing for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Our study assessed KRAS testing prevalence and its association with socio-demographic and clinical factors and examined first-line treatment.

Methods: Ten state population-based registries supported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) collected detailed cancer information on mCRC cases diagnosed in 2011, including KRAS biomarker testing and first-line treatment from ten central cancer registries. Data were analyzed with Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Of the 3,608 mCRC cases, 27% (n = 992) had a documented KRAS test. Increased age at diagnosis (p < 0.0001), racial/ethnic minorities (p = 0.0155), public insurance (p = 0.0018), and lower census tract education (p = 0.0023) were associated with less KRAS testing. Significant geographic variation in KRAS testing (p < 0.0001) ranged from 46% in New Hampshire to 18% in California. After adjusting for all covariates, age and residence at diagnosis (both p < 0.0001) remained predictors of KRAS testing. Non-Hispanic Blacks had less KRAS testing than non-Hispanic Whites (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61-0.97). Among those tested and found to have normal (wild-type) KRAS, 7% received anti-EGFR treatment; none received such treatment among those with KRAS mutated gene.

Conclusions: Despite NCCN guideline recommendations, 73% of mCRC cases diagnosed in 2011 had no documented KRAS test. Disparities in KRAS testing existed based on age, race, and residence at diagnosis.

Impact: These findings show the capacity of monitoring KRAS testing in the US using cancer registry data and suggest the need to understand the low uptake of KRAS testing, and associated treatment choices during the first year since diagnosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用美国十个国家癌症登记计划的人口数据,对确诊为转移性结直肠癌的患者进行 KRAS 检测和一线治疗。
背景:2011年,美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)建议对转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者进行KRAS检测。我们的研究评估了 KRAS 检测的普及率及其与社会人口学和临床因素的关系,并考察了一线治疗:由美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)国家癌症登记计划(NPCR)支持的十个州人口登记处收集了2011年确诊的mCRC病例的详细癌症信息,包括来自十个中央癌症登记处的KRAS生物标记物检测和一线治疗。数据采用卡方检验和多变量逻辑回归进行分析:在3608例mCRC病例中,27%(n = 992)有KRAS检测记录。诊断年龄增加(p < 0.0001)、少数种族/族裔(p = 0.0155)、公共保险(p = 0.0018)和人口普查区教育程度较低(p = 0.0023)与 KRAS 检测较少有关。KRAS检测的显著地域差异(p < 0.0001)从新罕布什尔州的46%到加利福尼亚州的18%不等。对所有协变量进行调整后,年龄和诊断时的居住地(均 p < 0.0001)仍是 KRAS 检测的预测因素。非西班牙裔黑人的 KRAS 检测率低于非西班牙裔白人(OR = 0.77,95% CI = 0.61-0.97)。在接受检测并发现KRAS基因正常(野生型)的患者中,7%接受了抗EGFR治疗;而在KRAS基因突变的患者中,没有人接受此类治疗:尽管NCCN指南提出了建议,但在2011年确诊的mCRC病例中,73%没有KRAS检测记录。根据年龄、种族和诊断时的居住地,KRAS检测存在差异:这些发现显示了美国利用癌症登记数据监测KRAS检测的能力,并表明有必要了解KRAS检测的低接受率以及诊断后第一年内的相关治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vulva and lower limb cancer: Results of inguinal lymph node staging on 81 cases Advances in artificial neural networks as a disease prediction tool Deuterium depletion inhibits lung cancer cell growth and migration in vitro and results in severalfold increase of median survival time of non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving conventional therapy Unique challenges and the changing face of oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond Variability in the metabolism of saccharides in bladder and colon cancer cell lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1