Advances in artificial neural networks as a disease prediction tool

Taylor Ma, Bennett Cl, Schoen Mw, Hoque S
{"title":"Advances in artificial neural networks as a disease prediction tool","authors":"Taylor Ma, Bennett Cl, Schoen Mw, Hoque S","doi":"10.14312/2052-4994.2021-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the last decade, utilization of machine learning has seen a sharp rise in fields such as computing, transportation, engineering, and medicine. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have demonstrated increased application due to their versatility and ability to learn from large datasets. The emergence of electronic health records has propelled healthcare into an era of personalized medicine largely aided by computers. This review summarizes the current state of ANNs as a predictive tool in medicine and the downfalls of reliance on a self-adjusting computer network to make healthcare decisions. Medical ANN studies can be grouped into three categories - diagnosis, classification, and prediction, with diagnostic studies currently dominating the field. However, recent trends show prediction studies may soon outnumber the remaining categories. ANN prediction studies dominate in fields such as cardiovascular disease, neurologic disease, and osteoporosis. Neural networks consistently show higher predictive accuracy than industry standards. But several pitfalls are preventing mainstream adoption. Clinicians often rely on situational pearls to make complex healthcare decisions, ANNs often do not account for intuitive variables during their analysis. Instead, ANNs rely on incomplete patient data and ‘black box’ computing to make decisions that are not completely transparent to the end-user. This has led to ‘runaway’ networks that may ultimately make inaccurate and harmful decisions. This review emphasizes the extensive potential of machine learning in medicine and the obstacles that must be overcome to utilize its full potential.","PeriodicalId":90205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14312/2052-4994.2021-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Throughout the last decade, utilization of machine learning has seen a sharp rise in fields such as computing, transportation, engineering, and medicine. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have demonstrated increased application due to their versatility and ability to learn from large datasets. The emergence of electronic health records has propelled healthcare into an era of personalized medicine largely aided by computers. This review summarizes the current state of ANNs as a predictive tool in medicine and the downfalls of reliance on a self-adjusting computer network to make healthcare decisions. Medical ANN studies can be grouped into three categories - diagnosis, classification, and prediction, with diagnostic studies currently dominating the field. However, recent trends show prediction studies may soon outnumber the remaining categories. ANN prediction studies dominate in fields such as cardiovascular disease, neurologic disease, and osteoporosis. Neural networks consistently show higher predictive accuracy than industry standards. But several pitfalls are preventing mainstream adoption. Clinicians often rely on situational pearls to make complex healthcare decisions, ANNs often do not account for intuitive variables during their analysis. Instead, ANNs rely on incomplete patient data and ‘black box’ computing to make decisions that are not completely transparent to the end-user. This has led to ‘runaway’ networks that may ultimately make inaccurate and harmful decisions. This review emphasizes the extensive potential of machine learning in medicine and the obstacles that must be overcome to utilize its full potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工神经网络作为疾病预测工具的进展
在过去的十年中,机器学习在计算、交通、工程和医学等领域的应用急剧增加。人工神经网络(ann)由于其通用性和从大型数据集学习的能力而得到了越来越多的应用。电子健康记录的出现将医疗保健推向了一个主要由计算机辅助的个性化医疗时代。这篇综述总结了人工神经网络作为医学预测工具的现状,以及依赖自调节计算机网络做出医疗保健决策的失败。医学人工神经网络研究可分为三大类——诊断、分类和预测,其中诊断研究目前在该领域占主导地位。然而,最近的趋势表明,预测研究可能很快就会超过其他类别。人工神经网络预测研究在心血管疾病、神经疾病和骨质疏松症等领域占主导地位。神经网络始终显示出比行业标准更高的预测准确性。但是有几个陷阱阻碍了主流的采用。临床医生经常依靠情景珍珠来做出复杂的医疗保健决策,人工神经网络在分析过程中往往不考虑直观的变量。相反,人工神经网络依赖于不完整的患者数据和“黑匣子”计算来做出对最终用户不完全透明的决策。这导致了“失控”的网络,最终可能会做出不准确和有害的决定。这篇综述强调了机器学习在医学中的广泛潜力和必须克服的障碍,以充分利用其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vulva and lower limb cancer: Results of inguinal lymph node staging on 81 cases Advances in artificial neural networks as a disease prediction tool Deuterium depletion inhibits lung cancer cell growth and migration in vitro and results in severalfold increase of median survival time of non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving conventional therapy Unique challenges and the changing face of oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond Variability in the metabolism of saccharides in bladder and colon cancer cell lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1