Dyllan Landry, Karson R Quinn, Stephen D Helmer, Noel C Sanchez
{"title":"Is Two Better Than One? A Retrospective Study on Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Using the Da Vinci<sup>®</sup> Dual-Console Robot.","authors":"Dyllan Landry, Karson R Quinn, Stephen D Helmer, Noel C Sanchez","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The da Vinci<sup>®</sup> surgical system has become standard in many specialties. The dual-console system has increased console time for residents during their training. This study evaluated patient outcomes using the single- versus dual-console system in resident training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted of patients who underwent various colorectal surgeries using either the single- or dual-console da Vinci<sup>®</sup> system. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients (54.2%) utilized the single-console and 60 (45.8%) utilized the dual-console. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, procedures performed, conversion to open, ICU admissions, total length of stay, need for blood transfusion, adequacy of surgical margin, number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, discharge disposition, or readmission, wound infection, or need for reoperation within 30 days. There was a nonsignificant decrease in operative time with the dual-console system (200.6 vs. 220.2 minutes, p = 0.111).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While this study showed no statistically significant differences between patient outcomes utilizing the single- versus dual-consoles, it showed that it is safe for use in training, and that more research is needed in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"418-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/29/15-418.PMC9710501.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The da Vinci® surgical system has become standard in many specialties. The dual-console system has increased console time for residents during their training. This study evaluated patient outcomes using the single- versus dual-console system in resident training.
Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted of patients who underwent various colorectal surgeries using either the single- or dual-console da Vinci® system. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected.
Results: Seventy-one patients (54.2%) utilized the single-console and 60 (45.8%) utilized the dual-console. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, procedures performed, conversion to open, ICU admissions, total length of stay, need for blood transfusion, adequacy of surgical margin, number of lymph nodes harvested, anastomotic leak, discharge disposition, or readmission, wound infection, or need for reoperation within 30 days. There was a nonsignificant decrease in operative time with the dual-console system (200.6 vs. 220.2 minutes, p = 0.111).
Conclusions: While this study showed no statistically significant differences between patient outcomes utilizing the single- versus dual-consoles, it showed that it is safe for use in training, and that more research is needed in this area.
介绍:达芬奇®手术系统已成为许多专业的标准。双控制台系统增加了住院医生在训练期间的控制台时间。本研究评估了住院医师培训中使用单控制台与双控制台系统的患者结果。方法:回顾性病例对照研究采用单控制台或双控制台达芬奇®系统进行各种结肠直肠手术的患者。收集患者统计资料、合并症和结果。结果:单控制台71例(54.2%),双控制台60例(45.8%)。在患者人口统计学、所做手术、转为开放、ICU入院、总住院时间、输血需求、手术切缘充足性、淋巴结数量、吻合口漏、出院处置、再入院、伤口感染或30天内再次手术需求方面无统计学显著差异。双控制台系统的手术时间无显著减少(200.6 vs. 220.2分钟,p = 0.111)。结论:虽然这项研究显示使用单控制台和双控制台的患者结果没有统计学上的显著差异,但它表明在训练中使用它是安全的,并且需要在该领域进行更多的研究。