[The Current Status of Diagnostic Tools for Leptospirosis].

Mitsumasa Saito, Yasuhiko Nikaido, Masahiro Matsumoto, Midori Ogawa, Sharon Y A M Villanueva
{"title":"[The Current Status of Diagnostic Tools for Leptospirosis].","authors":"Mitsumasa Saito,&nbsp;Yasuhiko Nikaido,&nbsp;Masahiro Matsumoto,&nbsp;Midori Ogawa,&nbsp;Sharon Y A M Villanueva","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by pathogenic <i>Leptospira</i> spp. The severity of leptospirosis vary from mild, flu-like disease to a more severe form, Weil's disease causing jaundice, hemorrhage, renal failure, and even death. Every year, 300,000‒500,000 cases of severe leptospirosis are reported around the world, with the case fatality rate being 10‒30%. The usual diagnostic tools for leptospirosis are 1) direct observation of leptospires in blood and urine under dark-field microscope, 2) isolation of leptospires from blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or urine samples by culture, 3) microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-<i>Leptospira</i> antibodies in serum, and 4) PCR to detect Leptospira DNA. At presents, the gold standards for diagnosis are culture isolation and MAT. However, it is actually not easy to isolate leptospires from clinical samples. On the other hand, it takes several days before the results of MAT become positive after the onset of illness. Moreover, MAT requires skilled handling, and also needs the maintenance of live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups. Hence other simple or rapid diagnostic tests are needed at the bedside. The micro capsule agglutination test (MCAT) to detect antibody and immunochromatographic assay to detect urinary antigen are currently in the research and development phases. In this paper, the characteristics of each diagnostic test for leptospirosis are described.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"27 2","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. The severity of leptospirosis vary from mild, flu-like disease to a more severe form, Weil's disease causing jaundice, hemorrhage, renal failure, and even death. Every year, 300,000‒500,000 cases of severe leptospirosis are reported around the world, with the case fatality rate being 10‒30%. The usual diagnostic tools for leptospirosis are 1) direct observation of leptospires in blood and urine under dark-field microscope, 2) isolation of leptospires from blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or urine samples by culture, 3) microscopic agglutination test (MAT) to detect anti-Leptospira antibodies in serum, and 4) PCR to detect Leptospira DNA. At presents, the gold standards for diagnosis are culture isolation and MAT. However, it is actually not easy to isolate leptospires from clinical samples. On the other hand, it takes several days before the results of MAT become positive after the onset of illness. Moreover, MAT requires skilled handling, and also needs the maintenance of live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups. Hence other simple or rapid diagnostic tests are needed at the bedside. The micro capsule agglutination test (MCAT) to detect antibody and immunochromatographic assay to detect urinary antigen are currently in the research and development phases. In this paper, the characteristics of each diagnostic test for leptospirosis are described.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[钩端螺旋体病诊断工具现状]。
钩端螺旋体病是一种由致病性钩端螺旋体引起的世界性人畜共患病。钩端螺旋体病的严重程度各不相同,从轻微的流感样疾病到更严重的韦尔氏病,引起黄疸、出血、肾功能衰竭,甚至死亡。世界各地每年报告30万至50万例严重钩端螺旋体病,病死率为10-30%。钩端螺旋体病的常用诊断手段有:1)在暗场显微镜下直接观察血液和尿液中的钩端螺旋体,2)通过培养从血液、脑脊液(CSF)或尿液中分离钩端螺旋体,3)显微镜凝集试验(MAT)检测血清中钩端螺旋体抗抗体,4)PCR检测钩端螺旋体DNA。目前诊断钩端螺旋体的金标准是培养分离和MAT,但从临床样本中分离钩端螺旋体并不容易。另一方面,在发病后,MAT结果变为阳性需要几天时间。此外,MAT需要熟练的处理,还需要维持代表所有血清群的活钩端螺旋体细胞。因此,需要在床边进行其他简单或快速的诊断测试。检测抗体的微胶囊凝集试验(MCAT)和检测尿抗原的免疫层析法目前正处于研发阶段。本文介绍了钩端螺旋体病各诊断试验的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Japanese Case of COVID-19 Caused by Omicron Strain with Y453F Substitution. [Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4]. [Evaluation of the Clinical Validity of the Clostridioides difficile Nucleic Acid Detection Kit "Smart Gene® CD ToxinB"]. [Relationship between Serotypes and Biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Names of Identified Bacteria in the Microbial Identification and Susceptibility Testing Devices]. Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1