Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.

IRB Pub Date : 2016-07-01
Victoria A Miller, Chris Feudtner
{"title":"Parent and Child Perceptions of the Benefits of Research Participation.","authors":"Victoria A Miller,&nbsp;Chris Feudtner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective of this study was to describe parents' and children's perceptions of the health benefits of research participation. We assessed 180 children ages 8 to 17 years who recently enrolled in medical research and their parents. Of the 136 parents with children on observational protocols, 41% indicated that there would be a health benefit to the child. Their descriptions of benefits revealed that many envisioned a future health benefit to the child arising from improvements in treatment due to the research. There was no difference in ratings of likelihood or importance of benefit between parents of children enrolled in observational protocols versus interventional protocols. Children enrolled in observational protocols were more likely to respond \"don't know\" to the question about potential health benefit compared to children on interventional protocols. For both observational and interventional protocols, the informed consent process may be enhanced when research personnel explicitly differentiate between different types of potential benefits, including heretofore-unrecognized future direct health benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":73513,"journal":{"name":"IRB","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5790123/pdf/nihms935663.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to describe parents' and children's perceptions of the health benefits of research participation. We assessed 180 children ages 8 to 17 years who recently enrolled in medical research and their parents. Of the 136 parents with children on observational protocols, 41% indicated that there would be a health benefit to the child. Their descriptions of benefits revealed that many envisioned a future health benefit to the child arising from improvements in treatment due to the research. There was no difference in ratings of likelihood or importance of benefit between parents of children enrolled in observational protocols versus interventional protocols. Children enrolled in observational protocols were more likely to respond "don't know" to the question about potential health benefit compared to children on interventional protocols. For both observational and interventional protocols, the informed consent process may be enhanced when research personnel explicitly differentiate between different types of potential benefits, including heretofore-unrecognized future direct health benefits.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母和孩子对参与研究的好处的看法。
本研究的主要目的是描述父母和儿童对参与研究的健康益处的看法。我们评估了180名最近参加医学研究的8至17岁儿童及其父母。在136名有孩子的父母中,41%的人表示这将对孩子的健康有益。他们对益处的描述表明,许多人设想,由于这项研究改善了治疗,未来儿童的健康将受益。参加观察性方案与干预性方案的儿童的父母对获益的可能性或重要性的评分没有差异。与干预性方案的儿童相比,参加观察性方案的儿童更有可能对有关潜在健康益处的问题回答“不知道”。对于观察性和干预性方案,如果研究人员明确区分不同类型的潜在益处,包括迄今为止尚未确认的未来直接健康益处,则可以加强知情同意程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IRB
IRB
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The wages of sin. Promoting Research with Organ Transplant Patients. Advance Directive for Research: How Do They Compare with Surrogates' Predictions of Older Adults' Preferences? Therapeutic Misperceptions in Early-Phase Cancer Trials: From Categorical to Continuous. Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1