Advance Directive for Research: How Do They Compare with Surrogates' Predictions of Older Adults' Preferences?

IRB Pub Date : 2018-09-01
Élodie Hérault, Gina Bravo, Lise Trottier
{"title":"Advance Directive for Research: How Do They Compare with Surrogates' Predictions of Older Adults' Preferences?","authors":"Élodie Hérault,&nbsp;Gina Bravo,&nbsp;Lise Trottier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surrogates' decisions and advance directives currently offer the best opportunities for people to participate in research at times of decisional incapacity. We investigated which of these options better reflects an older adult's willingness to engage in research should he or she be solicited to enroll in a study after losing the capacity to consent. Data were drawn from a recently completed trial in which older adults were invited to record their research advance directives in a booklet designed for that purpose. Three vignettes describing hypothetical studies were later used to elicit older adults' willingness to engage in these studies. Statistical analyses involved comparing surrogates' and advance directives' ability to predict the older adults' answers. No significant differences in agreement with older adults' hypothetical choices were found between surrogates and advance directives (p-values ranged from 0.164 to 0.720). Future studies could test whether more specific forms of research advance directives would assist surrogates in making research-related decisions for their loved ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":73513,"journal":{"name":"IRB","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surrogates' decisions and advance directives currently offer the best opportunities for people to participate in research at times of decisional incapacity. We investigated which of these options better reflects an older adult's willingness to engage in research should he or she be solicited to enroll in a study after losing the capacity to consent. Data were drawn from a recently completed trial in which older adults were invited to record their research advance directives in a booklet designed for that purpose. Three vignettes describing hypothetical studies were later used to elicit older adults' willingness to engage in these studies. Statistical analyses involved comparing surrogates' and advance directives' ability to predict the older adults' answers. No significant differences in agreement with older adults' hypothetical choices were found between surrogates and advance directives (p-values ranged from 0.164 to 0.720). Future studies could test whether more specific forms of research advance directives would assist surrogates in making research-related decisions for their loved ones.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究预先指示:它们如何与代理人对老年人偏好的预测相比较?
目前,代理人的决定和预先指示为人们在没有决策能力的时候参与研究提供了最好的机会。我们调查了这些选项中哪一个更能反映老年人参与研究的意愿,如果他或她在失去同意能力后被要求参加研究。数据来自最近完成的一项试验,在该试验中,老年人被邀请将他们的研究预先指示记录在为此目的设计的小册子中。三个描述假设研究的小插曲后来被用来引出老年人参与这些研究的意愿。统计分析包括比较代理人和预先指示者预测老年人答案的能力。代理人与事先指示在老年人的假设选择同意度方面没有显著差异(p值范围为0.164 ~ 0.720)。未来的研究可以测试更具体形式的研究预先指示是否会帮助代理人为他们所爱的人做出与研究相关的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IRB
IRB
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The wages of sin. Promoting Research with Organ Transplant Patients. Advance Directive for Research: How Do They Compare with Surrogates' Predictions of Older Adults' Preferences? Therapeutic Misperceptions in Early-Phase Cancer Trials: From Categorical to Continuous. Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1