Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.

IRB Pub Date : 2018-07-01
Minisha Lohani, Kristopher A Hendershot, Wendy Pelletier, Kristin Stegenga, Margie Dixon, Pamela S Hinds, Melissa A Alderfer, Rebecca D Pentz
{"title":"Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.","authors":"Minisha Lohani,&nbsp;Kristopher A Hendershot,&nbsp;Wendy Pelletier,&nbsp;Kristin Stegenga,&nbsp;Margie Dixon,&nbsp;Pamela S Hinds,&nbsp;Melissa A Alderfer,&nbsp;Rebecca D Pentz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has focused on the risks of research participation but has rarely considered possible benefits. For a study of family decision-making during pediatric bone marrow transplant, we conducted qualitative interviews with 132 family members across 36 families up to three times over the course of a year, before and after transplant. We concluded the study with qualitative interviews of 70 family members from 21 of the original families one year after the transplants, focusing on benefits and concerns regarding their research participation. Participants, including children and adolescents, reported benefits including the opportunity to talk, be altruistic, reflect, have a safe space, gain understanding or perspective, and express emotions. Sixteen percent expressed concerns, mostly finding aspects of the methodology annoying. We encourage institutional review boards to understand that sensitive conversations with adults, children or adolescents may not always increase the risk of the study and may offer benefits to those who agree to be interviewed. We therefore suggest that language describing potential benefits could be included in consent and assent forms for qualitative studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73513,"journal":{"name":"IRB","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has focused on the risks of research participation but has rarely considered possible benefits. For a study of family decision-making during pediatric bone marrow transplant, we conducted qualitative interviews with 132 family members across 36 families up to three times over the course of a year, before and after transplant. We concluded the study with qualitative interviews of 70 family members from 21 of the original families one year after the transplants, focusing on benefits and concerns regarding their research participation. Participants, including children and adolescents, reported benefits including the opportunity to talk, be altruistic, reflect, have a safe space, gain understanding or perspective, and express emotions. Sixteen percent expressed concerns, mostly finding aspects of the methodology annoying. We encourage institutional review boards to understand that sensitive conversations with adults, children or adolescents may not always increase the risk of the study and may offer benefits to those who agree to be interviewed. We therefore suggest that language describing potential benefits could be included in consent and assent forms for qualitative studies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参加纵向定性研究对家庭、儿童和青少年的潜在益处。
以前的研究关注的是参与研究的风险,但很少考虑可能的好处。为了研究儿科骨髓移植期间的家庭决策,我们在移植前后一年中对36个家庭的132名家庭成员进行了三次定性访谈。我们在移植一年后对来自21个原始家庭的70名家庭成员进行了定性访谈,重点关注他们参与研究的好处和担忧。包括儿童和青少年在内的参与者报告的好处包括有机会交谈、无私、反思、有一个安全的空间、获得理解或观点,以及表达情感。16%的人表达了担忧,大多数人认为这种方法令人讨厌。我们鼓励机构审查委员会理解,与成人、儿童或青少年进行敏感的谈话并不总是会增加研究的风险,而且可能会给同意接受采访的人带来好处。因此,我们建议在定性研究的同意和同意表格中加入描述潜在益处的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IRB
IRB
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The wages of sin. Promoting Research with Organ Transplant Patients. Advance Directive for Research: How Do They Compare with Surrogates' Predictions of Older Adults' Preferences? Therapeutic Misperceptions in Early-Phase Cancer Trials: From Categorical to Continuous. Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1