Comparison of Outcomes of Early vs Delayed Graft Reconstruction of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects.

Abel P David, Matthew Q Miller, Stephen S Park, J Jared Christophel
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes of Early vs Delayed Graft Reconstruction of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Defects.","authors":"Abel P David,&nbsp;Matthew Q Miller,&nbsp;Stephen S Park,&nbsp;J Jared Christophel","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Reconstructing Mohs defects often requires grafting in the form of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) and composite grafts. These grafts can be complicated by a variable and often indeterminable survival rate. Other researchers have found that delaying FTSG reconstruction improves graft outcomes, but the optimal interval between excision and reconstruction remains unclear, and no study has examined the association between delaying composite graft reconstruction and graft survival.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery defect reconstruction using FTSG and composite grafts with respect to patient- and surgery-specific variables, particularly early vs delayed reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective, single-institution cohort study assessed patients who underwent Mohs reconstructive surgery from January 1, 2012, to January 1, 2018. No patients had to be excluded for inadequate follow-up or incomplete medical records. Delayed reconstruction was defined as greater than 6 days after Mohs excision, the third quartile of the interval to reconstruction among our cohort.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcome was postoperative complications, including hematoma, infection, dehiscence, epidermolysis, and partial or full graft loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 320 defects were reconstructed with FTSG or composite grafts in 310 patients (median [range] age, 68 [21-96] years; 167 female [53.9%]) during the 6-year study period. The mean interval between the ablative and reconstructive operations was 4.73 days (range, 0-35 days). Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the significant indicators among patient and defect characteristics analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression model found delayed reconstruction to have a protective association (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-0.97; P = .046) and male sex to have a harmful association (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.52-4.20; P < .001) with postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that delaying reconstruction in FTSGs and composite grafts was associated with decreased rates of postoperative complications, and male sex was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. The findings suggest that this strategy can be considered in patients at increased risk for developing postoperative complications, such as current smokers, patients with large defects, and patients who require use of composite grafts.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1204","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Importance: Reconstructing Mohs defects often requires grafting in the form of full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) and composite grafts. These grafts can be complicated by a variable and often indeterminable survival rate. Other researchers have found that delaying FTSG reconstruction improves graft outcomes, but the optimal interval between excision and reconstruction remains unclear, and no study has examined the association between delaying composite graft reconstruction and graft survival.

Objective: To review the outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery defect reconstruction using FTSG and composite grafts with respect to patient- and surgery-specific variables, particularly early vs delayed reconstruction.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, single-institution cohort study assessed patients who underwent Mohs reconstructive surgery from January 1, 2012, to January 1, 2018. No patients had to be excluded for inadequate follow-up or incomplete medical records. Delayed reconstruction was defined as greater than 6 days after Mohs excision, the third quartile of the interval to reconstruction among our cohort.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was postoperative complications, including hematoma, infection, dehiscence, epidermolysis, and partial or full graft loss.

Results: A total of 320 defects were reconstructed with FTSG or composite grafts in 310 patients (median [range] age, 68 [21-96] years; 167 female [53.9%]) during the 6-year study period. The mean interval between the ablative and reconstructive operations was 4.73 days (range, 0-35 days). Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the significant indicators among patient and defect characteristics analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression model found delayed reconstruction to have a protective association (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-0.97; P = .046) and male sex to have a harmful association (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.52-4.20; P < .001) with postoperative complications.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that delaying reconstruction in FTSGs and composite grafts was associated with decreased rates of postoperative complications, and male sex was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. The findings suggest that this strategy can be considered in patients at increased risk for developing postoperative complications, such as current smokers, patients with large defects, and patients who require use of composite grafts.

Level of evidence: 3.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期与延迟移植重建Mohs显微手术缺损的效果比较。
重要性:重建莫氏缺损通常需要以全层皮肤移植(FTSGs)和复合移植的形式进行移植。这些移植物的存活率是可变的,往往是不确定的。其他研究人员发现延迟FTSG重建可改善移植物预后,但切除和重建之间的最佳间隔尚不清楚,也没有研究调查延迟复合移植物重建与移植物存活之间的关系。目的:回顾使用FTSG和复合移植物进行Mohs显微手术缺陷重建的患者和手术特异性变量的结果,特别是早期和延迟重建。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性、单机构队列研究评估了2012年1月1日至2018年1月1日接受莫氏重建手术的患者。没有患者因随访不充分或医疗记录不完整而被排除在外。延迟重建被定义为Mohs切除后超过6天,这是我们队列中重建间隔的第三个四分位数。主要结局和措施:主要结局是术后并发症,包括血肿、感染、裂开、表皮松解、部分或全部移植物丢失。结果:310例患者(年龄中位数[范围]68岁[21-96]岁;167名女性[53.9%])。消融和重建手术之间的平均间隔为4.73天(范围0-35天)。采用单因素logistic回归确定患者间的显著指标,并分析缺陷特征。多因素logistic回归模型发现,延迟重建具有保护性关联(优势比,0.52;95% ci, 0.27-0.97;P = 0.046)与男性存在有害关联(优势比,2.51;95% ci, 1.52-4.20;结论及相关性:本研究发现,ftsg和复合移植物延迟重建与术后并发症发生率降低相关,男性与术后并发症风险增加相关。研究结果表明,该策略可用于术后并发症风险增加的患者,如当前吸烟者,有较大缺陷的患者和需要使用复合移植物的患者。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1