Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

P. Govas, R. Kazi, Rachel M Slaugenhaupt, B. Carroll
{"title":"Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"P. Govas, R. Kazi, Rachel M Slaugenhaupt, B. Carroll","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nVibration has been shown to decrease injection site pain in patients; however, to date, this effect has not been assessed for patients who catastrophize pain (ie, patients who anticipate a higher pain level). The anticipation of a pain score greater than 4 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) has been associated with an increase in a patient's perception of procedural pain.\n\n\nObjective\nTo assess the efficacy of vibration during cutaneous anesthetic injection for dermatologic surgery for patients who catastrophize pain (NRS score >4) and patients who do not (NRS score ≤4).\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\nRandomized, parallel-group clinical trial from June 19 to September 4, 2018, at a tertiary dermatologic surgery clinic among 87 adults undergoing cutaneous cancer removal surgery. Patients completed a preprocedural questionnaire detailing their baseline pain, anticipated pain, and drug use. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis.\n\n\nInterventions\nUse of a vibratory anesthetic device (VAD) on the treatment site prior to anesthetic injection in the on (VAD ON) or off (VAD OFF) mode.\n\n\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nPain was reported using the 11-point NRS (where 0 indicates no pain and 11 indicates the worst pain imaginable). A minimum clinically important difference of 22% or more and a substantial clinically important difference of 57% or more were used to assess the efficacy of vibration in patient-reported NRS score during anesthetic injection (iNRS score).\n\n\nResults\nA total of 87 patients were included, with 101 unique events reported (among the unique events, 37 were reported in women and 64 were reported in men; mean [SD] age, 66.0 [11.3] years). The mean (confidence level [CL]) iNRS score for patients who catastrophized pain was 2.27 (0.66) compared with 1.44 (0.39) for patients who did not (P = .03). A 38.9% decrease in mean (CL) iNRS score was reported with VAD ON compared with VAD OFF in all participants (1.24 [0.38] vs 2.04 [0.54]). Patients who catastrophized pain reported a 25.5% decrease in mean (CL) iNRS score with VAD ON vs VAD OFF (1.91 [0.99] vs 2.57 [0.98]), and patients who did not reported a 79.4% decrease (1.02 [0.40] vs 1.84 [0.66]). VAD ON was the only statistically significant variable to affect iNRS score (F statistic, 2.741; P = .03).\n\n\nConclusions and Relevance\nThis trial demonstrates that those who catastrophize pain prior to a procedure report a higher perceived level of pain. The application of vibration during local anesthetic injection resulted in a minimum clinically important difference in pain level for patients who catastrophize pain and a substantial clinically important difference in pain level for patients who do not.\n\n\nLevel of Evidence\n2.\n\n\nTrial Registration\nClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03467685.","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0733","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Importance Vibration has been shown to decrease injection site pain in patients; however, to date, this effect has not been assessed for patients who catastrophize pain (ie, patients who anticipate a higher pain level). The anticipation of a pain score greater than 4 on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) has been associated with an increase in a patient's perception of procedural pain. Objective To assess the efficacy of vibration during cutaneous anesthetic injection for dermatologic surgery for patients who catastrophize pain (NRS score >4) and patients who do not (NRS score ≤4). Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, parallel-group clinical trial from June 19 to September 4, 2018, at a tertiary dermatologic surgery clinic among 87 adults undergoing cutaneous cancer removal surgery. Patients completed a preprocedural questionnaire detailing their baseline pain, anticipated pain, and drug use. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Interventions Use of a vibratory anesthetic device (VAD) on the treatment site prior to anesthetic injection in the on (VAD ON) or off (VAD OFF) mode. Main Outcomes and Measures Pain was reported using the 11-point NRS (where 0 indicates no pain and 11 indicates the worst pain imaginable). A minimum clinically important difference of 22% or more and a substantial clinically important difference of 57% or more were used to assess the efficacy of vibration in patient-reported NRS score during anesthetic injection (iNRS score). Results A total of 87 patients were included, with 101 unique events reported (among the unique events, 37 were reported in women and 64 were reported in men; mean [SD] age, 66.0 [11.3] years). The mean (confidence level [CL]) iNRS score for patients who catastrophized pain was 2.27 (0.66) compared with 1.44 (0.39) for patients who did not (P = .03). A 38.9% decrease in mean (CL) iNRS score was reported with VAD ON compared with VAD OFF in all participants (1.24 [0.38] vs 2.04 [0.54]). Patients who catastrophized pain reported a 25.5% decrease in mean (CL) iNRS score with VAD ON vs VAD OFF (1.91 [0.99] vs 2.57 [0.98]), and patients who did not reported a 79.4% decrease (1.02 [0.40] vs 1.84 [0.66]). VAD ON was the only statistically significant variable to affect iNRS score (F statistic, 2.741; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance This trial demonstrates that those who catastrophize pain prior to a procedure report a higher perceived level of pain. The application of vibration during local anesthetic injection resulted in a minimum clinically important difference in pain level for patients who catastrophize pain and a substantial clinically important difference in pain level for patients who do not. Level of Evidence 2. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03467685.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
振动麻醉装置对接受皮肤癌切除手术患者疼痛预期和随后疼痛感知的影响:一项随机临床试验。
重要的是,振动已被证明可以减少患者注射部位的疼痛;然而,到目前为止,这种影响还没有被评估的患者灾难的疼痛(即患者预期更高的疼痛水平)。在11分的数字评定量表(NRS)中,对疼痛评分大于4分的预期与患者对程序性疼痛的感知增加有关。目的评价震动对皮肤外科手术中出现巨痛(NRS评分≤4分)和无巨痛(NRS评分≤4分)患者注射皮麻的效果。设计、环境和参与者:2018年6月19日至9月4日,在一家三级皮肤外科诊所进行随机、平行组临床试验,共87名接受皮肤癌切除手术的成年人。患者完成了手术前问卷调查,详细说明了他们的基线疼痛、预期疼痛和药物使用情况。在意向治疗基础上进行分析。干预在麻醉注射前在治疗部位使用振动麻醉装置(VAD),打开(VAD on)或关闭(VAD off)模式。主要结果和测量方法使用11分NRS(0表示无疼痛,11表示可想象的最严重疼痛)报告疼痛。最小临床重要差异为22%或以上,显著临床重要差异为57%或以上,用于评估振动对麻醉注射期间患者报告的NRS评分(iNRS评分)的疗效。结果共纳入87例患者,报告独特事件101例(其中女性37例,男性64例;平均[SD]年龄,66.0[11.3]岁)。疼痛灾难化患者的平均iNRS评分(置信水平[CL])为2.27(0.66),而疼痛灾难化患者的平均iNRS评分为1.44 (0.39)(P = 0.03)。与VAD关闭组相比,VAD开启组的平均(CL) iNRS评分降低了38.9% (1.24 [0.38]vs 2.04[0.54])。严重疼痛的患者报告VAD ON与VAD OFF的平均(CL) iNRS评分下降25.5% (1.91 [0.99]vs 2.57[0.98]),未报告的患者报告下降79.4% (1.02 [0.40]vs 1.84[0.66])。VAD ON是影响iNRS评分的唯一有统计学意义的变量(F统计量,2.741;p = .03)。结论和相关性本试验表明,那些在手术前灾难化疼痛的人报告了更高的疼痛感知水平。在局部麻醉注射过程中,振动的应用对巨灾性疼痛患者的疼痛水平产生了最小的临床重要差异,而对非巨灾性疼痛患者的疼痛水平产生了重大的临床重要差异。2.证据水平临床试验注册号:NCT03467685。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
期刊最新文献
JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. Clarification of a Suspension Technique for Unstable Nasal Bones. Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer and Selective Neurectomy for Rehabilitation of the Synkinetic Smile. A Practical Precaution Relevant to Facial Injections. Effect of a Vibratory Anesthetic Device on Pain Anticipation and Subsequent Pain Perception Among Patients Undergoing Cutaneous Cancer Removal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1